Category Archives: Probable cause

AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DV civil proceeding

The exclusionary rule does not apply in Domestic Violence Protective Order proceeding. Green v. State, 2022 Alas. LEXIS 140 (Dec. 14, 2022) (due process claim). Multiple calls between the CI and defendant arranging a fentanyl deal and defendant showing up … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DV civil proceeding

OH4: Once dog alerts, automobile exception arises, and vehicle can be moved for search

Once a drug dog alerted on defendant’s car, the automobile exception arose, and the search did not have to occur right away. The vehicle could be removed to another location for the search. State v. Harper, 2022-Ohio-4357, 2022 Ohio App. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH4: Once dog alerts, automobile exception arises, and vehicle can be moved for search

S.D.Cal.: Release condition with firearm restriction and search waiver did not violate 2A or 4A

Defendant’s release condition of a firearm restriction and Fourth Amendment waiver because of a prior misdemeanor firearms conviction doesn’t violate the Second Amendment under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen (2022). Heller supports the court’s conclusion. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Release condition with firearm restriction and search waiver did not violate 2A or 4A

TX14: PC for a cell phone requires more than a bare conclusion one was present or involved; no PC here

“A probable cause affidavit supporting a cell phone search must contain evidence of the requisite nexus with more than mere conclusory allegations. For example, the Court of Criminal Appeals recently held that generic, boilerplate language about cell phone use among … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on TX14: PC for a cell phone requires more than a bare conclusion one was present or involved; no PC here

D.Alaska: On reconsideration, govt revealed officer misconduct, and court finds him not credible

After defendant’s motion to suppress was denied, the government alerted the court and defense to an internal investigation of the state trooper involved just concluded where 43 instances of violation of policy and procedure were documented. The search here turned … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Community caretaking function, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Alaska: On reconsideration, govt revealed officer misconduct, and court finds him not credible

Grid News: Can police use facial recognition as probable cause? Probably not, but some are doing it anyway

Grid News: Can police use facial recognition as probable cause? Probably not, but some are doing it anyway (“A new report from the Georgetown Center for Privacy Technology argues that facial recognition has serious flaws that make it unreliable for … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on Grid News: Can police use facial recognition as probable cause? Probably not, but some are doing it anyway

S.D.Ind.: Forced Covid test didn’t violate 4A

Requiring plaintiff, who said he was positive for Covid-19, be tested before putting him in hospital was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. It’s less intrusive than swabbing for DNA. Alternatively, qualified immunity applies. Mercado v. Columbus Reg’l Hosp., 2022 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Forced Covid test didn’t violate 4A

N.D.Cal.: There’s almost always PC in the contents of a stolen car, such as something of owner’s

There is probable cause to believe that there’s evidence of the crime in a stolen car. “It follows on this record that at a minimum there was also probable cause to believe that evidence of those suspected crimes (either car … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: There’s almost always PC in the contents of a stolen car, such as something of owner’s

IN: Juvenile’s blood draw by consent without statutory parental notification suppressed

The juvenile’s consent to a blood draw was without parental notification as required by statute, and it was expressed as a mere formality. The blood draw is suppressed. L.W. v. State, 2022 Ind. App. LEXIS 379 (Nov. 23, 2022). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Juvenile’s blood draw by consent without statutory parental notification suppressed

MI: With decrim of MJ, smell from a car no longer PC

With decriminalization, the [normal] smell of marijuana coming from a car is no longer probable cause. Also, defendant was seized when he was directed out of his vehicle and a bunch of law enforcement officers were waiting for him. People … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on MI: With decrim of MJ, smell from a car no longer PC

D.N.M.: DEA admin. subpoena to doctor’s office for all patient records of 41 was overbroad

A DEA administrative subpoena to a doctor’s office was overbroad where it sought all patient records for 41 patients. The doctor’s objection is sustained. The subpoena needs to be narrower in scope to match that of the investigation. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.N.M.: DEA admin. subpoena to doctor’s office for all patient records of 41 was overbroad

M.D.Fla.: Lack of a notary seal on state SW papers is a frivolous 4A issue

The Fourth Amendment argument that lack of a notary seal on Florida search warrant papers makes it void is frivolous. Amalfitano v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209729 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 18, 2022). An officer using a dead man’s … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Lack of a notary seal on state SW papers is a frivolous 4A issue

W.D.N.Y.: RS for parole search of house justified by failure to report, curfew and travel violations, and tampering with GPS

A parolee’s “fail[ure] to report to the parole office, staying out past curfew, traveling out of his parole-approved area, and tampering with his GPS monitor” justified a parole search of the home. United States v. Jackson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: RS for parole search of house justified by failure to report, curfew and travel violations, and tampering with GPS

M.D.Fla.: Cross-examining officer about mistakes in SW affidavit was mentioned in not finding IAC

All defense lawyers have likely done this: Cross-examining an officer over factual mistakes in the search warrant affidavit. This was mentioned in rejecting other parts of defense counsel’s representation at trial as not deficient under Strickland. Neiheisel v. United States, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Cross-examining officer about mistakes in SW affidavit was mentioned in not finding IAC

E.D.N.Y.: A single incident of legal mail being opened in jail doesn’t state a claim

A single incident of legal mail being opened before it got to plaintiff in a county jail doesn’t state a constitutional violation. Braithwaite v. Suffolk Cty. N.Y., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204233 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2022). There is no reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: A single incident of legal mail being opened in jail doesn’t state a claim

CA6: Officer’s mistake he’d worked with CI before not shown to be Franks violation

Officer’s mistake in saying he’d worked with CI before that proved false still wasn’t enough to show a Franks violation because it could just be an innocent mistake and not enough to undermine the probable cause. United States v. Duncan, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Officer’s mistake he’d worked with CI before not shown to be Franks violation

CA10: Not unreasonable for state court to not apply exclusionary rule in sentencing

Under the unreasonable application standard of 2254, the Utah court did not unreasonably conclude the exclusionary rule would not be applied in the sentencing phase of a criminal trial. Menzies v. Powell, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 30789 (10th Cir. Nov. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Not unreasonable for state court to not apply exclusionary rule in sentencing

D.Neb.: Affidavits for SWs are judged by what they contain, not what they lack

Affidavits for search warrants are judged by what they contain, not what they lack. United States v. Cass, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195502 (D. Neb. Sep. 30, 2022), adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197043 (D.Neb. Oct. 26, 2022). It was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Affidavits for SWs are judged by what they contain, not what they lack

D.Nev.: Ptf states claim AT&T provided real time CSLI to police without warrant

Plaintiff’s complaint that AT&T provided real time CSLI to Reno police without a search warrant states enough of a claim to proceed for now. Houston v. AT&T, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194789 (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2022). Defendant was found … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Ptf states claim AT&T provided real time CSLI to police without warrant

CA6: Search of building next door to def’s building wasn’t reason to suppress def’s search

Officers with a search warrant for 8537 Old Rutledge Pike, Knox County, Tennessee also searched what they believed was an outbuilding at 8533 with a power cord running between them with no indication it was different property. At worst, this … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Overseizure, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA6: Search of building next door to def’s building wasn’t reason to suppress def’s search