Author Archives: Hall

EFF: Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

EFF: Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant by Matthew Guariglia (“New reporting has revealed that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) is attempting to create … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on EFF: Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

LA5: Off-duty officer feeling a bag was a search, but bag was abandoned

Defendant left a bag on the counter of a gym and went outside and acted suspicious. An off-duty officer was a customer. He felt the bag, feeling a gun. Then police were called. This qualified as a government search, but … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity, Search, Standing | Comments Off on LA5: Off-duty officer feeling a bag was a search, but bag was abandoned

CA4: GFE doesn’t save search that wasn’t even authorized by the SW

The cell phone warrant here only authorized its seizure, not its search. Therefore, the good faith exception doesn’t even apply to save the search. United States v. Ray, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13483 (4th Cir. June 3, 2025). In sum:

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: GFE doesn’t save search that wasn’t even authorized by the SW

MO: Civil discovery is a due process issue, not 4A one

Civil discovery is a due process issue, not a Fourth Amendment one. The civil discovery here was reasonable. Neighborhood Legal Support of Kansas City v. Ontman, 2025 Mo. App. LEXIS 374 (June 3, 2025), citing State ex rel. Kansas City … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Due process, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Civil discovery is a due process issue, not 4A one

S.D.Ohio: Casting state court’s failure to follow 4A precedent more closely as a due process violation still Stone barred

2254 petitioner’s due process claim that the state court denied due process by not following precedent was barred by Stone. Allen v. Warden, SE. Corr. Inst., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104131 (S.D. Ohio June 2, 2025). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Casting state court’s failure to follow 4A precedent more closely as a due process violation still Stone barred

N.D.Ohio: Visitor getting high and passing out on couch doesn’t give standing to challenge search of premises

Defendant got high and fell asleep on the couch, and he was there when the raid occurred. He didn’t have standing. United States v. Taylor, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103820 (N.D. Ohio June 2, 2025). The government’s motion to reconsider … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Private search, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Visitor getting high and passing out on couch doesn’t give standing to challenge search of premises

CA2: Records production under NYS rent control relief provision doesn’t violate 4A

For landlords to get relief from the 1974 NYS rent stabilization laws, they have to provide some records. This does not violate the Fourth Amendment. Hudson Shore Assocs. Ltd. P’ship v. New York, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13349 (2d Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA2: Records production under NYS rent control relief provision doesn’t violate 4A

Cert. granted: Case v. Montana on emergency entries into the home without PC

Case v. Montana, 24-624 (granted June 2, 2025). Question presented: “Whether law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid exception requires probable cause.”

Posted in Emergency / exigency, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Cert. granted: Case v. Montana on emergency entries into the home without PC

EFF: The Defense Attorney’s Arsenal In Challenging Electronic Monitoring

EFF: The Defense Attorney’s Arsenal In Challenging Electronic Monitoring by Hannah Zhao:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: The Defense Attorney’s Arsenal In Challenging Electronic Monitoring

CA6: Change in protective sweep argument between district court and appeal was waiver

Defendant’s protective sweep argument changed from the district court to appeal, so the argument urged here is waived. Below he argued the protective sweep was unreasonably extended but here it’s whether it should have occurred at all. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Change in protective sweep argument between district court and appeal was waiver

E.D.Va.: Lack of a recording for SW application in violation of state law didn’t violate 4A

There was no recording of the showing of probable cause for this state warrant that became a part of a federal prosecution. The lack of a recording isn’t fatal to the showing of probable cause found by the issuing magistrate … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Lack of a recording for SW application in violation of state law didn’t violate 4A

Reason: Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”

Reason: Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment” (“A debate between Volokh bloggers.”)

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on Reason: Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”

D.C.Cir.: Ptf stated 1A retaliation claim over civil investigative demand

Media Matters stated a claim in D.C. for First Amendment retaliation by the Texas Attorney General’s civil investigative demand for records based on not liking their reporting. Injunction affirmed. Media Matters for America v. Paxton, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13155 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Private search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Ptf stated 1A retaliation claim over civil investigative demand

CA6: Two officers with separate PC can use one warrant

When two officers have separate probable cause to search, they don’t need separate search warrants, as long as the description covers their purpose. At least qualified immunity applies here. Fitzpatrick v. Hanney, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13214 (6th Cir. May … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: Two officers with separate PC can use one warrant

N.D.Fla.: Police going to backyard with a drug dog violated curtilage

Officers went into defendant’s backyard with a drug dog and that unreasonably invaded the curtilage. United States v. Holland, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102751 (N.D. Fla. May 30, 2025):

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Police going to backyard with a drug dog violated curtilage

D.Or.: Search of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not 4A

Reading a prisoner’s legal mail may violate the First Amendment, but he can’t show that it violated the Fourth Amendment because there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in prison and nothing interfered with his cases. Lewis v. Conway, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Or.: Search of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not 4A

E.D.Mich.: PC showing was thin, but good enough for the GFE

The probable cause showing was thin, but it was enough, and the good faith exception applies in any event. United States v. Mills, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102174 (E.D. Mich. May 29, 2025)*:

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC showing was thin, but good enough for the GFE

W.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep was unjustified, and SW based on what seen was suppressed

Defendant had managerial control over the business property searched enough that he had standing to challenge its search. The security sweep of the second floor was not reasonable and, to the USMJ, “ma[de] no sense”; there was no articulable reason … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Independent source, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep was unjustified, and SW based on what seen was suppressed

WSJ: Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment

WSJ: Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment by Lauro Landro (“New systems for documenting outpatient visits are adding features and moving into hospitals; ‘we are just scratching the surface’”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WSJ: Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment

NYT: Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans

NYT: Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans by Sheera Frenkel and Aaron Krolik (“In March, President Trump signed an executive order calling for the federal government to share data across agencies, raising questions over whether he might compile … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on NYT: Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans