Author Archives: Hall

GA: Officer didn’t have to distinguish between smell of MJ, hemp, and CBD to have PC to search car

Under existing precedent, the smell of suspected marijuana couldn’t be distinguished between hemp and CBD, and that was still probable cause for search of the car. Coverstone v. State, 2024 Ga. App. LEXIS 90 (Mar. 4, 2024). “First, Officer Murphy … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Officer didn’t have to distinguish between smell of MJ, hemp, and CBD to have PC to search car

AP: A woman wins $3.8 million verdict after SWAT team searches wrong home based on Find My iPhone app

AP: A woman wins $3.8 million verdict after SWAT team searches wrong home based on Find My iPhone app by Colleen Slevin:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on AP: A woman wins $3.8 million verdict after SWAT team searches wrong home based on Find My iPhone app

CA9: Two controlled buys by others afterward going to def’s house was nexus

Nexus to defendant’s house was shown by two controlled buys with others who traveled back to his house afterward. United States v. Espinoza, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 5147 (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2024). “The warrant for appellant’s medical records was … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Two controlled buys by others afterward going to def’s house was nexus

N.D.Ohio: Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing

Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing. There were four packages here sent under assumed names to assumed names. The anticipatory warrant was based on probable cause. United States v. Taylor, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36749 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing

N.D.Ga.: Assuming without deciding standing to challenge a college email account, there was PC for the email warrant

Defendant sent threatening emails through his Georgia Tech account. He also sent private emails with tax and property information. He raised a Franks challenge, too. Assuming without deciding he has standing to challenge the email search, there was probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, E-mail, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Assuming without deciding standing to challenge a college email account, there was PC for the email warrant

M.D.Pa.: Ordering driver out of car doesn’t extend it for Rodriguez purposes

Ordering the driver out of the car is incidental to the mission of the stop and doesn’t extend it for Rodriguez purpses. United States v. Brabham, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36681 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2024). While the smell of … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Ordering driver out of car doesn’t extend it for Rodriguez purposes

D.Conn.: That accomplices communicated by text messaging justified SW for cell phone

This cell phone was with probable cause and was particular. “Here, the warrant affidavits clearly established probable cause to conclude that Sinisterra was involved in all three shootings described therein. He was implicated by two individuals who corroborated each other … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Conn.: That accomplices communicated by text messaging justified SW for cell phone

D.Utah: Automobile exception permits search under the hood

The automobile exception permits a search under the hood, even if it is not the most likely spot to find drugs and a weapon. Here, a clip was found in the car, and the gun it belonged to under the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Utah: Automobile exception permits search under the hood

Reason: Yes, Warrants Allow a Search Through the Whole Phone

Reason: Yes, Warrants Allow a Search Through the Whole Phone by Orin S. Kerr (“A comment on a mistaken way to limit computer searches— focusing on People v. Carson from the Michigan Court of Appeals.”):

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search | Comments Off on Reason: Yes, Warrants Allow a Search Through the Whole Phone

D.Kan.: Cross-designated state-federal officer was “federal officer” for assault charge during execution of SW

Assaulting a state officer cross-designated as a federal officer qualified for assaulting a federal officer during execution of a search warrant. United States v. Butler, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36172 (D. Kan. Mar. 1, 2024). The state courts did not … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Cross-designated state-federal officer was “federal officer” for assault charge during execution of SW

UT: Emergency aid exception permitted entry for apparent homicide victim who was missing

The emergency aid exception permitted entry into this murder scene. The victim was the grandmother of a child who punctually picked the child up every day at school. When she didn’t show for hours, the school notified police. They went … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on UT: Emergency aid exception permitted entry for apparent homicide victim who was missing

N.D.W.Va.: “[T]he purpose of a motion to suppress is not to challenge the sufficiency or admissibility of evidence.” That’s for a motion in limine

“[T]he purpose of a motion to suppress is not to challenge the sufficiency or admissibility of evidence. See U.S. v. Musgrave, 726 F. Supp. 1027 (W.D.N.C. 1989) (‘As the Government contends … evidentiary issues are better addressed at trial through … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: “[T]he purpose of a motion to suppress is not to challenge the sufficiency or admissibility of evidence.” That’s for a motion in limine

C.D.Cal.: Holding back on 4A claim in habeas was waiver and Stone barred

2254 petitioner had a duty to raise his alleged search claims timely in state court, and his failure to do so “doomed” that claim on habeas. Claiming a desire to raise it later is almost certainly too little too late. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Holding back on 4A claim in habeas was waiver and Stone barred

NY2: SW for def’s cell phone browser history lacked PC, but here it was harmless error

“The defendant correctly contends that the police search of his browsing history and URLs of his Blackberry cell phone was not authorized by the search warrant obtained by the police. ‘To establish probable cause, a search warrant must provide sufficient … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY2: SW for def’s cell phone browser history lacked PC, but here it was harmless error

CA11: CoA granted on 2255 4A claim based on alleged prosecutorial misconduct

2255 appellant gets a certificate of appealability for the district court’s possible misapprehension of the Fourth Amendment issue he raised which included a prosecutorial misconduct claim. Jones v. United States, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 4629 (11th Cir. Feb. 27, 2024):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA11: CoA granted on 2255 4A claim based on alleged prosecutorial misconduct

LA2: Search of nonparole roommate’s room required PC and SW

There is risk of a nonparolee roommate to parole searches of their common area. Once a search can occur, however, the rights of the roommate not on parole have to be respected. A search of the roommate’s room requires probable … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on LA2: Search of nonparole roommate’s room required PC and SW

Scientific American: ‘Consent’ Searches Don’t Stop Drug Trafficking. They Threaten Privacy Rights

Scientific American: ‘Consent’ Searches Don’t Stop Drug Trafficking. They Threaten Privacy Rights by Derek Epp, Hannah L. Walker, Megan Dias & Marcel Roman (“U.S. police embraced frequent “consent” searches of motorists during the ‘tough on crime’ era. These searches, meant … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on Scientific American: ‘Consent’ Searches Don’t Stop Drug Trafficking. They Threaten Privacy Rights

C.D.Cal.: Franks challenge succeeds in FIPF case

The search warrant for felon in possession was based on the officer affiant’s assertion defendant was a convicted felon but it was based on evaluation of paperwork from Georgia that showed he was a first offender without judgment of guilt … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Franks challenge succeeds in FIPF case

Defendant consented to search of his car, not knowing the battery was of interest to the police as a place to hide contraband.

When defendant consented to search of his car, he didn’t know that the battery was of interest to the police as a place to hide contraband. As far as he knew, the battery was inside the car so the consent … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on Defendant consented to search of his car, not knowing the battery was of interest to the police as a place to hide contraband.

E.D.Wis.: Ptfs state claim that City of Green Bay’s installation of listening devices in public hallways likely violates the 4A

The City of Green Bay installed listening devices in public hallways of City Hall to monitor all conversations there for security purposes. When they found out, plaintiffs sued claiming a reasonable expectation of privacy in conversations conducted in such a … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Ptfs state claim that City of Green Bay’s installation of listening devices in public hallways likely violates the 4A