WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: 11th Circuit: Cops weren’t given enough notice that police tactics used for decades are unconstitutional

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: 11th Circuit: Cops weren’t given enough notice that police tactics used for decades are unconstitutional by Radley Balko:
Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: 11th Circuit: Cops weren’t given enough notice that police tactics used for decades are unconstitutional

LA5: PC developed in lengthy investigation excused lack of SW by inevitable discovery

It wasn’t reasonable for the police to believe that defendant’s father had apparent authority to consent to a search of locked box. However, inevitable discovery applies because the investigation was well underway, and there was probable cause for a search warrant at that point: “When all of these factors are combined, the officers possessed sufficient probable cause to obtain a search warrant for the contents of the locked box and a search warrant would have been obtained.” State v. Ables, 2017 La. App. LEXIS 172 (La.App. 5 Cir. Feb. 8, 2017).

“Based on the totality of circumstances, the Court finds reasonable person in Naylor’s position would have felt free to go about his business after Officer Hardesty returned all the paperwork and no citation was issued. The evidence shows that Naylor consented to the post-stop encounter, and therefore, the prolonging of the traffic stop in this case does not implicate the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Naylor, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183630 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 7, 2017).*

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on LA5: PC developed in lengthy investigation excused lack of SW by inevitable discovery

D.Nev.: Untimely motion to suppress summarily denied

Defendant’s untimely motion to suppress is denied. United States v. Drexler, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13833 (D.Nev. Feb. 1, 2017).

Defendant was arrested for bank robbery, and a search incident to arrest of his person was valid and based on probable cause. United States v. Wright, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14337 (D. D.C. Feb. 2, 2017).*

Posted in Motion to suppress, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Untimely motion to suppress summarily denied

M.D.La.: Officer’s claim of a burglary in progress and that a protective sweep was justified was completely unjustified

It should have been apparent to the officers that the defendant was a friend of the homeowner and was a guest in the premises, and their entry was unjustified under a claim of a burglary in progress or that a protective sweep was required. United States v. Brown, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15156 (M.D.La. Jan. 31, 2017).

The stop of the car defendant was in was justified for speeding 50 in a 30. The government doesn’t have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt reasonable suspicion. Defendant’s furtive movements in the justified his frisk. United States v. Doherty, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10316 (E.D.Wis. Jan. 6, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10321 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 25, 2017).*

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Officer’s claim of a burglary in progress and that a protective sweep was justified was completely unjustified

MA: There is no requirement of a search protocol in the SW but it is advisable to restrain execution in computer searches

An IP address as a source of child pornography provides sufficient probable cause and nexus to search the subscriber’s home and computer. There are no search protocols for the warrant but it is advisable to use them. An administrative subpoena can be used for IP subscriber information. Commonwealth v. Molina, 2017 Mass. LEXIS 109 (Feb. 7, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on MA: There is no requirement of a search protocol in the SW but it is advisable to restrain execution in computer searches

W.D.Pa.: Mere shareholder in a business had no standing to challenge SW

As a mere shareholder in a business, defendant had no standing to challenge the search warrant of the property. At the time of the search, he had no personal interest in it. United States v. Taylor, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14463 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2017).

The plaintiff was a pro-life protester outside of a Texas Planned Parenthood who allegedly left the green space they were allowed to be on to contact women going in. His arrest was without probable cause and the officers had to know it. The district court improperly granted summary judgment to the officers on qualified immunity. Davidson v. City of Stafford, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2189 (5th Cir. Feb. 7, 2017), as revised 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5665 (5th Cir. March 31, 2017).*

Posted in Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Mere shareholder in a business had no standing to challenge SW

NM: No proof of common authority for consent by an occasional visitor; state doesn’t recognize apparent authority

The evidence did not show the consenter had common authority, and New Mexico does not recognize apparent authority. The exception for protective sweep and the community caretaking function also didn’t apply because there was no bona fide need for either. State v. Ramos, 2017 N.M. App. LEXIS 4 (Feb. 2, 2017).

Defendant juvenile was reported to have been shot and entered an apartment with a gun. The police were obligated to follow up, and, by all indications, his sister who also lived there, could consent to the police entry, notwithstanding their failure to advise her of her right to refuse. People v. Shakeem B., 2017 NY Slip Op 27024, 2017 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 389 (2d Dept. Jan. 24, 2017).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NM: No proof of common authority for consent by an occasional visitor; state doesn’t recognize apparent authority

OH10: Officers could open defendant’s car door when he was apparently passed out in the front seat

Officers could open defendant’s car door when he was apparently passed out in the front seat. State v. Hall, 2017-Ohio-446, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 441 (10th Dist. Feb. 7, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on OH10: Officers could open defendant’s car door when he was apparently passed out in the front seat

SW for a pacemaker: WaPo: A man detailed his escape from a burning house. His pacemaker told police a different story.

WaPo: A man detailed his escape from a burning house. His pacemaker told police a different story. by Cleve R. Wootson Jr.:
Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches | Comments Off on SW for a pacemaker: WaPo: A man detailed his escape from a burning house. His pacemaker told police a different story.

NYLJ: Facebook, DA Argue Over Constitutionality of Search Warrants

NYLJ: Facebook, DA Argue Over Constitutionality of Search Warrants by John Stashenko:
Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on NYLJ: Facebook, DA Argue Over Constitutionality of Search Warrants

Fortune: Social Media at the Border: Can Agents Ask for Your Facebook Feed?

Fortune: Social Media at the Border: Can Agents Ask for Your Facebook Feed? by Jeff John Roberts:
Continue reading →

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on Fortune: Social Media at the Border: Can Agents Ask for Your Facebook Feed?

M.D.Pa.: Motion to suppress denied without prejudice for failure to plead any facts or law or brief the issue with cases

Motion to suppress denied without prejudice for failing to cite facts or authority or provide a cogent argument. United States v. Guerrier, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14405 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Motion to suppress denied without prejudice for failure to plead any facts or law or brief the issue with cases

W.D.Tex.: Border search cursory search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable

A border search cursory search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable, even under Cotterman. They also had more than reasonable suspicion. United States v. Escarcega, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185466 (W.D. Tex. July 29, 2015):
Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Border search cursory search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable

NY1: Pawnbrokers have been heavily regulated for a century; rules for information storage are reasonable

Pawnbrokers have been a heavily regulated industry for over a century. NYC’s requirement of provision of certain information in digital format is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment (compare California Bankers Assn. v. Schultz) and the limited administrative searches are reasonable. Granted, the New York Constitution provides greater protection than the Fourth Amendment, but the regulations and statute are reasonable. Collateral Loanbrokers Assn. of N.Y., Inc. v. City of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 00953, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 949 (1st Dept. Feb. 7, 2017).

Defendant’s home search probation condition was reasonable and served an important state interest. State v. Scott, 283 Ore. App. 566, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 113 (Feb. 1, 2017).*

Posted in Administrative search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY1: Pawnbrokers have been heavily regulated for a century; rules for information storage are reasonable

M.D.Pa.: General motion to suppress denied for not pleading any facts or law

“In light of the fact that Defendant fails to specify which statements he is seeking to suppress and the insufficiency of Defendant’s explanation for why the arrest warrant lacks probable cause, I am unable to properly consider these motions. Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is complicated and voluminous, and Defendant’s counsel, by, yet again, not citing to a single case, fails to properly put forward legally supported arguments. The issue of whether suppression of evidence is appropriate, or whether any statements were elicited in violation of applicable constitutional laws is a complex one, and Defendant’s conclusory arguments and incomplete analysis of this complex problem is inadequate.” United States v. Guerrier, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14405 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2017).

Posted in Burden of proof, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: General motion to suppress denied for not pleading any facts or law

IN: 4A doesn’t require a SW be obtained at the earliest possible time

Officers were tipped off to the defendant coming through with drugs eight hours before he was stopped. The stop was for speeding and weaving, and a drug dog was used which alerted. The fact the officers had eight hours warning didn’t require them to get a search warrant. “The fact that there may or may not have been enough information to obtain a search warrant to search that same vehicle earlier that day has no impact on the legality of the subsequent search and seizure; officers do not have to obtain a warrant at the first practicable moment.” Whitenack v. State, 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 45 (Feb. 3, 2017).

A trailer hitch ball partially obstructing a license plate is reasonable suspicion for a stop. State v. Tregeagle, 2017 Ida. App. LEXIS 12 (Feb. 3, 2017).*

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IN: 4A doesn’t require a SW be obtained at the earliest possible time

S.D.Ind.: Spending money is not an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless search to recover the money

Defendant spending money is not an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless search to recover the money. United States v. Jett, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13544 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 1, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Spending money is not an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless search to recover the money

CA6: CSLI by court order was valid; lengthy pole camera observation of publicly seen areas reasonable

Lengthy CSLI was obtained by a cell site simulator but with a court order. Pleading the pen register statute is no help to the defense because there is no exclusionary remedy. Pre-Jones GPS tracking was valid under Davis. Finally, lengthy pole cameras observing public sides of the property invaded no privacy interests. United States v. Powell, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2093 (6th Cir. Feb. 6, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Pole cameras | Comments Off on CA6: CSLI by court order was valid; lengthy pole camera observation of publicly seen areas reasonable

W.D.Ky.: Typo in the affidavit for SW didn’t merit suppression; when corrected, no staleness

The wiretap underlying the search warrant has already been sustained by the USDJ, so that can’t support suppressing the search. Defendant’s Franks challenge to the affidavit because of the date is really just a typo (2004 v. 2012), so it didn’t merit a hearing. If it was 2004 there’d be a staleness problem. When corrected, there’s not. The affidavit for the search warrant shows more than adequate probable cause. United States v. Ramirez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183118 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 9, 2016), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11448 (W.D. Ky. Jan. 27, 2017).

A wiretap on the phone of another provided probable cause for a search of defendant’s car under the automobile exception. United States v. Morrison, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11912 (E.D.Pa. Jan. 27, 2017).*

Posted in Staleness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Typo in the affidavit for SW didn’t merit suppression; when corrected, no staleness

Bloomberg: Trump Quips He’d ‘Destroy’ Texas Lawmaker Who Irked Sheriff [over forfeiture reform]

Bloomberg: Trump Quips He’d ‘Destroy’ Texas Lawmaker Who Irked Sheriff by Toluse Olorunnipa & Margaret Talev:

President Trump jokes about destroying a politician’s career
Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Trump Quips He’d ‘Destroy’ Texas Lawmaker Who Irked Sheriff [over forfeiture reform]