OH10: Officers could open defendant’s car door when he was apparently passed out in the front seat

Officers could open defendant’s car door when he was apparently passed out in the front seat. State v. Hall, 2017-Ohio-446, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 441 (10th Dist. Feb. 7, 2017):

[*P7] The officers, upon approaching the vehicle and investigating, had reasonable grounds to believe that Hall was under the influence of something. Their extended knocking on the window of the vehicle elicited no response for a significant period of time. Hall finally came to a little but made no effort to respond to the officers and what they later asserted was their effort to check on his well-being. Instead, he knocked on the vehicle’s window from the inside and then passed out again or went back to sleep.

[*P8] Unfortunately, we live in a time where people are dying daily from drug overdoses. People also die from drinking too much alcohol. Police officers who encounter a person passed out or unconscious in a motor vehicle in all likelihood have an obligation to further investigate the situation. They also have a right to investigate a possible violation of R.C. 4511.194. Because of the situation presented by Hall’s apparent condition, the officers had the right to open the vehicle’s door to at least communicate with Hall about his condition. Once the vehicle’s door was open, the cocaine was in plain view.

[*P9] The trial court should not have decided that this was an illegal search or seizure. Counsel for Hall asserts that the officers were really acting in an effort to investigate rumors that Hall was engaged in illegal trafficking in controlled substances at the bar where his SUV was parked. The Supreme Court of the United States has decided that the actual intention of police is irrelevant to the legality of a search. If the officers have reasonable grounds to believe they are witnessing illegal activity, they can investigate further. A search or seizure does not become illegal because police were hoping to search or seize, assuming what the police initially witnessed gave them probable cause to investigate or even arrest for a crime. Hall’s physical state combined with his having keys to a motor vehicle in his hand gave the police the right to open the door of the SUV and inquire and investigate the situation.

This entry was posted in Community caretaking function. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.