New York Magazine: Watching Donald Trump Try to Puzzle Out What ‘Asset Forfeiture’ Means Is Deeply Discomfiting

New York Magazine: Watching Donald Trump Try to Puzzle Out What ‘Asset Forfeiture’ Means Is Deeply Discomfiting by Jesse Singal:
Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on New York Magazine: Watching Donald Trump Try to Puzzle Out What ‘Asset Forfeiture’ Means Is Deeply Discomfiting

Alternet (via Salon): One nation, under cops: 3 reasons to believe America could become a police state under Trump

Alternet (via Salon): One nation, under cops: 3 reasons to believe America could become a police state under Trump by Alexandra Rosenmann
A civil rights attorney weighs in on “Big Picture” with Thom Hartmann

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Alternet (via Salon): One nation, under cops: 3 reasons to believe America could become a police state under Trump

IA: Def’s father’s search of his stuff was objectively as a concerned parent, not as a LEO so it’s a private search

Defendant’s stepfather was a Davenport police officer, and, off-duty, he searched defendant’s property twice and turned it over to the police. The detail of his actions show him acting as a concerned parent, not as a law enforcement officer. Therefore, it’s a private search. State v. Brown, 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 9 (Feb. 10, 2017).

The driver’s and passenger’s stories didn’t match, so, when the warning was complete, the officer asked for consent and then called for a drug dog. Reasonable suspicion had developed by then. United States v. Melchior, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17175 (D.Neb. Jan. 17, 2017).*

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Def’s father’s search of his stuff was objectively as a concerned parent, not as a LEO so it’s a private search

IA: A claim of officer safety has to be objectively justified by the record; Rodriguez followed under state constitution

Iowa adopts Rodriguez under state constitution after a lengthy comparison of its own cases and cases from around the country. A claim of officer safety has to be objectively justified by the record; merely stating it doesn’t make it so. State v. Coleman, 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 11 (Feb. 10, 2017), overruling Jackson v. State, 315 N.W.2d 766 (Iowa 1982):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IA: A claim of officer safety has to be objectively justified by the record; Rodriguez followed under state constitution

ID: Implied consent remains an exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely

Implied consent remains an exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely. State v. Ortega-Vastida, 2017 Ida. App. LEXIS 15 (Feb. 9, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on ID: Implied consent remains an exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely

CA10: Officers pulled up next to def walking along road and finally told him to stop; this was a seizure without RS

Defendant was walking down the street at night and a police car pulled up beside him and officers were talking to him as he walked. Finally they told him to stop. This was a seizure for which there was no reasonable suspicion. He was near a construction site where there had been thefts, but he was doing nothing wrong. That necessarily would make anybody walking near there subject to a stop, and that’s just not the law. Also, the government did not raise Strieff attenuation because that case was decided after briefing and oral argument [but should have been known to be pending by then because cert. was granted Oct. 1, 2015] so it is waived. United States v. Hernandez, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2324 (10th Cir. Feb. 9, 2017) (2-1):
Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: Officers pulled up next to def walking along road and finally told him to stop; this was a seizure without RS

S.D.Ga.: Def’s evasive movements near and shortly after a shooting call was RS

Defendant’s evasive movements near and shortly after a shooting call that at least partially matched him was reasonable suspicion. “The sum of the information available to the officers when they decided to stop Porter gave them reasonable suspicion that he was engaged in criminal activity. Some twelve minutes after the first 911 call, and relatively near to where the shooting occurred, Det. Smith observed Porter behaving in a manner that he properly judged to be suspicious in light of his experience. Even if there had been no report of a shooting or flashing blue lights just down the street, such furtive behavior (hiding in the shadows, not crossing the street until the coast was clear, and avoiding main streets in favor of alleys) would naturally draw the interest of a police officer on patrol in such a high-crime area. Once the witness confirmed that the jacket Porter was wearing matched clothing worn by the shooter, the totality of the circumstances gave the officers reasonable suspicion sufficient to stop him for questioning.” United States v. Porter, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183776 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 23, 2016).

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Def’s evasive movements near and shortly after a shooting call was RS

NY4: Search of cell phone for texts led to SW; not inevitable discovery because SW sought because of illegal search

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights in his cell phone text messages were violated by the police searching them without a warrant. The fact they got a warrant later didn’t help them because that was the only reason to search the phone, so no inevitable discovery. On this record, however, the error is harmless. People v. Burdine, 2017 NY Slip Op 01055, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1070 (4th Dept. Feb. 10, 2017).

Defendant was encountered in a motel parking lot and told by the police they wanted to do an administrative probation search of his motel room after they saw hypodermic needles in his car door. Defendant backed up to his car and reached behind his back and tossed a gun in the car. His move was obvious to the police, and the gun was in plain view. He was not seized at the moment he tossed the gun. Carello v. State, 2017 Del. LEXIS 55 (Feb. 8, 2017).*

Posted in Cell phones, Inevitable discovery, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY4: Search of cell phone for texts led to SW; not inevitable discovery because SW sought because of illegal search

VA: Jardines not retroactive on state habeas review

Defendant’s conviction was final ten months before Jardines was decided by SCOTUS. “Therefore, because the controlling legal landscape when Oprisko’s conviction became final did not dictate that use of a drug-sniffing dog within the curtilage of private property was a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, and neither of the exceptions recognized in Teague applies, the habeas court did not err in ruling that Jardines did not apply retroactively to Oprisko’s conviction.”
Oprisko v. Dir. of the Dep’t of Corr., 2017 Va. LEXIS 4 (Feb. 9, 2017).

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on VA: Jardines not retroactive on state habeas review

WI: Probation condition against possession of a computer gives the PO power to search one found

Defendant had arson and sex offender convictions, and a term of probation was no computers without approval. They found a computer with live modems at his house, and he denied that the big computer worked, but he had a laptop. “When a condition of probation prohibits the possession of an item, and the probationer knowingly breaks that condition, ‘in most situations’ a probation agent would ‘presumably’ have ‘reasonable grounds’ to search the contents of the item. Purtell, 358 Wis. 2d 212, ¶30. Moreover, given Keller’s possession and admitted use of a computer at the house in violation of the probationary rules, his prior conviction for possession of child pornography provided reasonable grounds to search the contents for further illegal use of the computer in violation of the rules.” State v. Keller, 2017 Wisc. App. LEXIS 80 (Feb. 8, 2017).

Parolee’s house search was justified on credible information from an FBI informant passed on to parole services that defendant had cocaine in his house. People v. Sapp, 2017 NY Slip Op 01104, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1098 (4th Dept. Feb. 10, 2017).*

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WI: Probation condition against possession of a computer gives the PO power to search one found

Baltimore Sun: Aerial surveillance by Baltimore police has promise, should be studied more, report concludes

Baltimore Sun: Aerial surveillance by Baltimore police has promise, should be studied more, report concludes by Kevin Rector:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Baltimore Sun: Aerial surveillance by Baltimore police has promise, should be studied more, report concludes

Tenth Amendment Center: Arizona Committee Passes Bill to Prohibit Warrantless Stingray Spying

Tenth Amendment Center: Arizona Committee Passes Bill to Prohibit Warrantless Stingray Spying by Mike Maharry:

PHOENIX, Ariz, (Feb. 10, 2017) – An Arizona bill that would ban the use of “stingrays” to track the location of phones and sweep up electronic communications without a warrant in most situations unanimously passed an important Senate committee yesterday. The proposed law would not only protect privacy in Arizona, but would also hinder one aspect of the federal surveillance state.

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on Tenth Amendment Center: Arizona Committee Passes Bill to Prohibit Warrantless Stingray Spying

NY Co.Ct.: Need for an emergency entry doesn’t need to rise to PC

Uncorroborated hearsay statement defendant was suicidal was still enough for an emergency entry. The need for an emergency entry doesn’t even necessarily have to rise to the level of probable cause. People v. Ormanian, 2016 NY Slip Op 26456, 2016 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4947 (Fulton Co. Nov. 9, 2016),

Defendant waived his suppression motion by pleading guilty. Even so, he can’t suppress his identity from the arrest. Santacruz-Ramirez v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183695 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2016).*

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NY Co.Ct.: Need for an emergency entry doesn’t need to rise to PC

WaPo: How to stop data collection on your Vizio (or other smart) television

WaPo: How to stop data collection on your Vizio (or other smart) television by Hayley Tsukayama:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: How to stop data collection on your Vizio (or other smart) television

D.D.C.: Under Md. v. King, govt needn’t show actual need for DNA of already arrested person

The government moved for DNA by buccal swab from four defendants, and it does not have to show a need for genetic testing under Maryland v. King. United States v. Proctor, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16618 (D.D.C. Feb. 2, 2017).

Defendant was stopped because of a 911 call about a threat he made about using an “AR.” The police had probable cause for an automobile exception search. Alternatively, it would have been valid under inventory. United States v. Ervin, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15535 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 3, 2017).*

The safety sweep of defendant’s property was justified and had no effect on the subsequent search warrant, even if the sweep was unlawful, which it wasn’t. Parks v. State, 2017 Miss. App. LEXIS 58 (Feb. 7, 2017).*

Posted in DNA, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Under Md. v. King, govt needn’t show actual need for DNA of already arrested person

S.D.Ohio: Officers had good reason to know CP on flash drive before looking; SW was based on independent source

Defendant’s house was broken into by neighbors, and they stole things, including a flash drive which defendant had admitted to them in the past had child pornography on it. The police got the flash drive from the neighbor and looked at it and then got a warrant. The first look was illegal, but the warrant had an independent source. United States v. Chapman-Sexton, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15495 (S.D.Ohio Feb. 3, 2017)* [Note that the private search doctrine isn’t applied because the neighbors didn’t look at the flash drive; they just had possession of it.]

Defendant was on tribal lands and he was stopped by a tribal officer. As soon as the window was rolled down, it was apparent that defendant wasn’t an Indian, but tribes have the authority to keep unwanted persons off their lands. There also was no basis to keep him because no crime had occurred. Defendant’s motion to suppress is granted. United States v. Cooley, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17276 (D.Mont. Feb. 7, 2017).*

Posted in Independent source, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Officers had good reason to know CP on flash drive before looking; SW was based on independent source

E.D.Ky.: Def asked for consent and lawyered up; officers looked at his gf and she consented; no Randolph violation

Officers spoke to defendant and he lawyered up. Then they turned to his girlfriend and talked to her getting consent. This was valid under Randolph. Defendant was right there and could have objected but didn’t. She had common authority to consent. United States v. Brown, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15380 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 3, 2017).

The odor of marijuana coming from a car is probable cause to search it under the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. State v. Parrott, 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 50 (Feb. 6, 2017).*

Defendant’s property was seized from a motel room, and it was subjected to a proper inventory by the FBI. United States v. Maturano-Marin, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183595 (N.D.Ga. Nov. 1, 2016),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14464 (N.D.Ga. Feb. 1, 2017).*

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Def asked for consent and lawyered up; officers looked at his gf and she consented; no Randolph violation

N.D.Ala.: One is not free to leave when officer retains his DL; otherwise, case is essentially a repeat of Strieff

A person is not free to leave when the officer retains his driver’s license. The officer’s conduct in detaining defendant here was no worse than in Strieff, and the finding of the arrest warrant would not be suppressed. United States v. Burr, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14543 (N.D. Ala. Jan. 17, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14149 (N.D. Ala. Feb. 1, 2017).

“I find this traffic stop to be lawful under the Fourth Amendment. With respect to the final issue of voluntary consent, it is apparent that Warfield’s will was not overborne. Regardless of whether Warfield knew he was in fact free to leave, Warfield did not appear coerced when he gave consent to the search of the trunk. Warfield possessed his identification at the time the consent was given, and responded ‘No problem’ to the request, and opened the trunk himself. (Doc. No. 23, Exhibit 1). Under the totality of the circumstances, I find consent was freely given for the search.” United States v. Warfield, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13144 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 31, 2017).*

Posted in Attenuation, Consent | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: One is not free to leave when officer retains his DL; otherwise, case is essentially a repeat of Strieff

S.D.Fla.: Throwing a bag aside when seeing the police is an abandonment

Throwing a bag aside when seeing the police is an abandonment. It was speculation he would retrieve it if the police didn’t get it. United States v. Morrow, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14604 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14605 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 1, 2017).*

Defendant’s 2255 claim that his lawyer didn’t pursue a search question was denied because of a complete lack of standing to challenge the search of somebody else’s vehicle. United States v. Sanchez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9701 (D.R.I. Jan. 24, 2017).*

Playpen warrants sustained. United States v. Deichert, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11902 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2017),* United States v. Bee, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13055 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 13, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12687 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 31, 2017).*

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Throwing a bag aside when seeing the police is an abandonment

Ars Technica: Judge sides with Microsoft, allows “gag order” challenge to advance

Ars Technica: Judge sides with Microsoft, allows “gag order” challenge to advance by Cyrus Farivar
Microsoft Corp. v. United States DOJ, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18691 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 8, 2017)
Court: “First Amendment rights may outweigh the Government interest in secrecy.”
Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Ars Technica: Judge sides with Microsoft, allows “gag order” challenge to advance