W.D.Ky.: Typo in the affidavit for SW didn’t merit suppression; when corrected, no staleness

The wiretap underlying the search warrant has already been sustained by the USDJ, so that can’t support suppressing the search. Defendant’s Franks challenge to the affidavit because of the date is really just a typo (2004 v. 2012), so it didn’t merit a hearing. If it was 2004 there’d be a staleness problem. When corrected, there’s not. The affidavit for the search warrant shows more than adequate probable cause. United States v. Ramirez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183118 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 9, 2016), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11448 (W.D. Ky. Jan. 27, 2017).

A wiretap on the phone of another provided probable cause for a search of defendant’s car under the automobile exception. United States v. Morrison, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11912 (E.D.Pa. Jan. 27, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Staleness, Warrant requirement. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.