Monthly Archives: June 2026

CA9: False evidence to arrest violates due process

Arrest on false evidence in a malicious prosecution case was based on a due process violation that undermined probable cause to arrest: Ciria v. Gerrans, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16318 (9th Cir. June 5, 2026):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA9: False evidence to arrest violates due process

CA6: The SW affidavit here was thin, but it wasn’t completely bare bones, so GFE applies

After controlled buys from defendant’s house, two separate police departments prepared search warrants for his place, and they were presented together. One was signed. Defendant moved to suppress contending there was no probable cause and it was so lacking that … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: The SW affidavit here was thin, but it wasn’t completely bare bones, so GFE applies

D.Minn.: Extending stop to run ALPR information on car was with RS

Here, the officer in a traffic stop wanted to run defendant’s LPN through ALPRs to determine whether the travel was as stated. There was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop 15 minutes for that. United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abandonment, Automatic license plate readers, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Extending stop to run ALPR information on car was with RS

CA3: Ptf was arrested on an apparent but recalled warrant, then officers confirmed it and let him go; the arrest was reasonable

Plaintiff was arrested because the officers reasonably believed there was a warrant for his arrest. “When Vince provided documentation that the warrant had been lifted, the officers confirmed the information and released him, which was reasonable under the circumstances. Therefore, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: Ptf was arrested on an apparent but recalled warrant, then officers confirmed it and let him go; the arrest was reasonable

N.D.Ohio: Failure to serve state SW within state mandated time not 4A violation

The state search warrant in this case was not served within three days as required by Ohio law. That did not violate the Fourth Amendment, and he shows no prejudice. United States v. Calhoun, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121202 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure, State constitution, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Failure to serve state SW within state mandated time not 4A violation

NY1: Gunshot through floor from apartment above was exigency

Exigency justified entry into defendant’s apartment. The tenant below called 911 to report a shooting down through his ceiling and gunshots above. People v. Santiago, 2026 NY Slip Op 03398 (1st Dept. June 2, 2026). “Ms. Sandoval next asserts that … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Seizure | Comments Off on NY1: Gunshot through floor from apartment above was exigency

Reason: Most Civil Forfeiture Victims Never See the Inside of a Courtroom

Reason: Most Civil Forfeiture Victims Never See the Inside of a Courtroom by J.D. Tuccille (“Modest reforms have helped, but civil forfeiture remains legalized theft by government agencies.” “Two years ago, the Netflix film Rebel Ridge turned a common law … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: Most Civil Forfeiture Victims Never See the Inside of a Courtroom

CA8: Admission of anonymous tip that led to stop violated Confrontation Clause

Admission in evidence of the anonymous tip that led to defendant’s stop violated the Confrontation Clause. United States v. Simpson, 25-1263 (8th Cir. June 2, 2026). The search warrants here were subject to the Privacy Protection Act, and they were … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Privileges, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Admission of anonymous tip that led to stop violated Confrontation Clause

CO: Anonymous report of student smoking pot in school justified backpack search

An anonymous report to a school official the juvenile was smoking pot in class justified a search of his backpack under T.L.O. Suppression order reversed. People in interest of T.J.W., 2026 CO 38 (June 1, 2026). Defendant’s parole search was … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Probation / Parole search, School searches, Social media warrants, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CO: Anonymous report of student smoking pot in school justified backpack search

CA6: CI’s lie to get into def’s house to video him making a drug deal with the CI didn’t violate 4A

The informant’s lie to get into defendant’s house to video him making a drug deal with the CI didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. See Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 210 (1966). United States v. Warick, 2026 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: CI’s lie to get into def’s house to video him making a drug deal with the CI didn’t violate 4A

TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

“In this case, the evidence was that, although the Defendant lived in the van, the van was registered to someone else, and the vehicle registration indicated the same. The doors to the van were wide open and it was parked … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

VI: Despite ubiquity of cell phones, nexus has to be shown to alleged crime

The suppression of the cell phone is affirmed. The telephonic warrant omitted to mention what it was that the police were seizing. The ubiquity of cell phones isn’t carte blanche to seize any cell phone in a defendant’s possession. There … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on VI: Despite ubiquity of cell phones, nexus has to be shown to alleged crime