Monthly Archives: June 2021

VA: Owner’s suspended DL supported stop under Glover

Officers had reasonable suspicion under Glover to believe the driver of a vehicle was the owner who had a suspended DL. Mitchell v. Commonwealth, 2021 Va. App. LEXIS 89 (June 8, 2021). “Calvert’s comments to police to shoot him and … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: Owner’s suspended DL supported stop under Glover

CA2: No 4A extraterritorial jurisdiction over Switzerland enforcing its own law against Americans in Switzerland

An extraterritorial seizure of art work and antiquities in Switzerland of American citizens doesn’t involve the Fourth Amendment. International law has not adopted the Fourth Amendment’s probable cause standard. There is no justification shown for applying the Fourth Amendment to … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on CA2: No 4A extraterritorial jurisdiction over Switzerland enforcing its own law against Americans in Switzerland

N.D.Ill.: Arrest in common area of apt building not on curtilage

Defendant’s arrest in a common area of an apartment building was not on the curtilage. United States v. Anderson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106278 (N.D. Ill. June 7, 2021). Defendant’s Franks challenge fails as to what was omitted from the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Arrest in common area of apt building not on curtilage

PA: Reasonable inference for stop that owner with suspended DL was driving vehicle

The officer had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant’s vehicle on the inference that the driver was the owner who had an outstanding warrant. The court declines to adopt a higher standard for reasonable suspicion under the state constitution. Commonwealth v. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on PA: Reasonable inference for stop that owner with suspended DL was driving vehicle

BBC: ANOM: Hundreds arrested in massive global crime sting using messaging app

BBC: ANOM: Hundreds arrested in massive global crime sting using messaging app (“More than 800 suspected criminals have been arrested worldwide after being tricked into using an FBI-run encrypted messaging app, officials say. [¶] The operation, jointly conceived by Australia … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Digital privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on BBC: ANOM: Hundreds arrested in massive global crime sting using messaging app

S.D.Ohio: Social workers must comply with 4A

Social workers must comply with the Fourth Amendment, and they can plead exceptions. Scharbrough v. South Central Ohio Job & Family Servs., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105993 (S.D. Ohio June 7, 2021)*:

Posted in Search | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Social workers must comply with 4A

CA8: GPS info can provide RS as to def’s location whether or not it’s admissible at trial

GPS information as to defendant’s location can be reasonable suspicion despite defendant’s claims it might not be admissible at trial. United States v. Martin, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16822 (8th Cir. June 7, 2021):

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: GPS info can provide RS as to def’s location whether or not it’s admissible at trial

CA8: If firearms are “tools of the trade” of drug dealers, so are cell phones

Defendant’s using his cell phone to arrange a drug transaction justified a search warrant for it. If firearms are “tools of the trade,” then so are cell phones. United States v. Eggerson, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16823 (8th Cir. June … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA8: If firearms are “tools of the trade” of drug dealers, so are cell phones

Army: Consent to search was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority

Defendant’s consent to search his apartment was obtained after telling him that it was based on the death of his roommate in the parking lot. He was in “custody,” and this was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority. “In … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on Army: Consent to search was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority

WI: Holding def’s DL without RS made the stop unreasonable while drug dog was summoned

“On the certified question, we conclude that the answer depends on the totality of circumstances surrounding an encounter. Further, while VanBeek was not seized when Officer Oetzel took her driver’s license to run a records check, VanBeek was seized when … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Holding def’s DL without RS made the stop unreasonable while drug dog was summoned

D.Kan.: Delayed stop and furtive movements justified vehicle frisk

“The Court concludes that the protective sweep exception applies. When the officers first attempted to pull Canada over, Canada took an abnormal amount of time to stop his vehicle, despite a clear roadway with no obstructions. The officers testified that … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Delayed stop and furtive movements justified vehicle frisk

E.D.Mich.: Even with redactions, SW affidavit shows PC

Redacted search warrant application showed probable cause even with redactions. United States v. Rivers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104195 (E.D. Mich. June 3, 2021). The officer had called for a tow truck for defendant’s car and an inventory was inevitable, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inevitable discovery, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Even with redactions, SW affidavit shows PC

MD: Tracking “court order” didn’t need to be called a “warrant” to be one

A “court order” for tracking defendant’s vehicle satisfied the warrant requirement, and it didn’t have to be called a search warrant. It was issued with probable cause, and the good faith exception applied. Whittington v. State, 2021 Md. LEXIS 255 … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MD: Tracking “court order” didn’t need to be called a “warrant” to be one

CA6: SW affidavit can suggest CI’s lack of credibility, but here it was overcome

It is possible for a search warrant affidavit to suggest the lack of credibility of the CI, but, here, the CI’s credibility was corroborated by other facts and her willingness to be identified. United States v. Woods, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA6: SW affidavit can suggest CI’s lack of credibility, but here it was overcome

WV: Exclusionary rule would not be applied in administrative child abuse proceeding for protection of children

The exclusionary rule does not apply to child abuse allegations in administrative proceedings. The court declines the request to apply it despite the rule that it doesn’t apply in civil cases generally because of harm to the children. In re … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on WV: Exclusionary rule would not be applied in administrative child abuse proceeding for protection of children

CA7: Omission of CI’s criminal history was “unfortunate” but not material for Franks

“[W]e agree with the district court that the ‘omission of information about the sources’ backgrounds, criminal histories, or motives does not change the probable cause determination.’ See also United States v. Sims, 551 F.3d 640, 645 (7th Cir. 2008) (omission … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: Omission of CI’s criminal history was “unfortunate” but not material for Franks

IN: Plain view applied to vehicle seizure in driveway

Plain view justified the seizure of defendant’s van in his driveway, even assuming it was on the curtilage. It was immediately apparent to the officers it was criminal evidence. Combs v. State, 2021 Ind. LEXIS 358 (June 3. 2021). n.5:

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IN: Plain view applied to vehicle seizure in driveway

NY1: Cross-examination about potential suspects let go from scene of search opened door to suppressed statement

Defendant’s cross-examination about others not ultimately charged after the search opened the door to his suppressed statement. “First, defendant elicited that although the police arrested him and the other two persons who were in his apartment at the time a … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on NY1: Cross-examination about potential suspects let go from scene of search opened door to suppressed statement

CA3: Ghostwritten SW affidavit not a Franks violation because there was indisputably PC

A police officer’s admission at trial that the affidavit for search warrant was ghostwritten for him didn’t show a Franks violation because there clearly was probable cause. United States v. Ware, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16568 (3d Cir. June 3, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Ghostwritten SW affidavit not a Franks violation because there was indisputably PC

N.D.Ohio: DMV’s computer mistake def’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans

DMV’s computer mistake defendant’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans. United States v. Salazar, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103027 (N.D. Ohio June 2, 2021). Defendant’s “regenerating” activity in selling heroin made the warrant application not stale. … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Exclusionary rule, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: DMV’s computer mistake def’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans