Monthly Archives: February 2021

CA2: The officer’s perceptions were reasonable that entry into defendant’s backyard was necessary

“Nor can we say that Galligan’s enforcement action was clearly unlawful. The undisputed facts of this case demonstrate that Plaintiffs kept a variety of unusual objects in their backyard, causing it to resemble a junkyard. The question is not whether … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA2: The officer’s perceptions were reasonable that entry into defendant’s backyard was necessary

MO: Trial court erred in shifting burden on voluntariness of consent to def and considering failure to testify at suppression hearing

The trial court erred in putting the burden of proof on the defendant to rebut the state’s claim of consent. He didn’t testify, but he cross-examined. The trial court also held against him the failure to testify. State v. Crum, … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on MO: Trial court erred in shifting burden on voluntariness of consent to def and considering failure to testify at suppression hearing

Reason: SCOTUS To Decide if Cops Need More ‘Elbow Room’ To Conduct Certain Warrantless Home Searches

Reason: SCOTUS To Decide if Cops Need More ‘Elbow Room’ To Conduct Certain Warrantless Home Searches by Damon Root (“A new case tests the limits of the “community caretaking exception” to the Fourth Amendment.”)

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on Reason: SCOTUS To Decide if Cops Need More ‘Elbow Room’ To Conduct Certain Warrantless Home Searches

NYT: Opinion: They Stormed the Capitol. Their Apps Tracked Them.

NYT: Opinion: They Stormed the Capitol. Their Apps Tracked Them. By Charlie Warzel and Stuart A. Thompson (“Times Opinion was able to identify individuals from a trove of leaked smartphone location data.”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYT: Opinion: They Stormed the Capitol. Their Apps Tracked Them.

N.D.Ohio: Reasonableness of a parole search can include considering def’s criminal record

Knights on parole and probation searches is a reasonableness on the totality test, and this measures up. Defendant’s criminal record is a relevant factor for the officers to consider. United States v. Sharp, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18768 (N.D. Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Reasonableness of a parole search can include considering def’s criminal record

D.Mass.: No REP in an apt wrongfully entered by def

Defendant had no objective reasonable expectation of privacy in an apartment he wrongfully entered and assaulted the occupant. A black case he kept there had a subjective expectation of privacy but not an objective one. United States v. John, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mass.: No REP in an apt wrongfully entered by def

E.D.N.C.: PC was shown, but not nexus, and GFE does not apply

The affidavit showed probable cause, but it completely failed to show nexus to defendant’s place. It was so deficient in the showing of nexus that the good faith exception cannot apply. United States v. King, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18956 … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonableness, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: PC was shown, but not nexus, and GFE does not apply

OH12: GFE applies to precedent decided day before search where nobody knew of the case

The day before defendant’s parole search, the state supreme court put the legality of his parole status in doubt. Nobody involved even knew about the case. The court agrees that the good faith exception applies to the search because there … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on OH12: GFE applies to precedent decided day before search where nobody knew of the case

M.D.N.C.: SW materials remain under seal

The government showed sufficient grounds to have the search warrant application remain under seal to protect the integrity of the investigation. United States ex rel. Childress v. Carolina Comprehensive Health Network, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18389 (M.D. N.C. Feb. 1, … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.N.C.: SW materials remain under seal

DE: Texting linked def’s cell phone to murder and was nexus for SW

“Second, the affidavits supported the Magistrate’s determination that there was a nexus between the murder and Defendant’s iPhone. The affidavits averred that Witness 2 texted Defendant throughout the day of the murder.” State v. Wilson, 2021 Del. Super. LEXIS 84 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on DE: Texting linked def’s cell phone to murder and was nexus for SW

D.Mass.: Ptf stated claim for trespass for wrongful protective sweep in material witness arrest

Plaintiff stated a FTCA claim for trespass and intentional infliction of emotional distress for an alleged unjustified protective sweep entering his house to arrest him as a material witness in a military commission case. Gill v. United States, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Ptf stated claim for trespass for wrongful protective sweep in material witness arrest

W.D.N.C.: The part of the SW for drugs was severable and without PC; drugs found, however, were in plain view in stolen property search

The affidavit for this search warrant didn’t show probable cause to search for drugs, but it did for stolen property. Severing that part, when the officers searched for stolen property, they found drugs, and they were thus in plain view. … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: The part of the SW for drugs was severable and without PC; drugs found, however, were in plain view in stolen property search

Orchids of Asia Day Spa unlawfully made videos ordered destroyed

Reason: Cops Must Destroy Illegal Surveillance Videos From Spa Visited by Robert Kraft by Elizabeth Nolan Brown (“Authorities ‘shall destroy the videos unlawfully obtained through the surveillance of the Orchids of Asia Day Spa,’ a federal judge says.”) Techdirt: Federal … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on Orchids of Asia Day Spa unlawfully made videos ordered destroyed

CBS Baltimore: Baltimore’s Board Of Estimates Ends Agreement With Company Running Aerial Surveillance Program

CBS Baltimore: Baltimore’s Board Of Estimates Ends Agreement With Company Running Aerial Surveillance Program (“The Baltimore City Board of Estimates on Wednesday unanimously approved ending the city’s agreement with the company undertaking the controversial aerial surveillance program. In April 2020, … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CBS Baltimore: Baltimore’s Board Of Estimates Ends Agreement With Company Running Aerial Surveillance Program

D.P.R.: When emails are searched, a taint team isn’t always required; a large amount may be seized for later search

Ex ante search restrictions are rare. The warrant process is concerned with what may be searched for and seized, not necessarily how, and a taint teams isn’t always required. The officers could seize a large number of emails and then … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Particularity | Comments Off on D.P.R.: When emails are searched, a taint team isn’t always required; a large amount may be seized for later search

D.N.M.: M.R.E. 315 and 4A permit oral applications and search authorizations

M.R.E. 315 provides for search authorizations, and this one wasn’t an anticipatory warrant with conditions. Oral applications and authorizations are constitutionally proper per United States v. Brown, 784 F.2d 1033, 1036 (10th Cir. 1986). An Air Force regulation on the … Continue reading

Posted in Military searches, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.N.M.: M.R.E. 315 and 4A permit oral applications and search authorizations

CA3: No RS; def’s actions were innocuous individually and on the totality; reversed

Defendant’s actions that the district court held were reasonable suspicion were innocuous on the totality, and the CI was not corroborated. The motion to suppress should have been granted. United States v. Bullock, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 2499 (3d Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: No RS; def’s actions were innocuous individually and on the totality; reversed

D.Idaho: Def’s PC challenge was really a Franks challenge and should be viewed like one

Defendant sought to challenge his search warrant as a lack of probable cause but couched it in terms that sounded like Franks. He needs to make this clear so the government can appropriately respond. United States v. McComas, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Def’s PC challenge was really a Franks challenge and should be viewed like one

VICE: How New York Quietly Ended Its Street Drug War

VICE: How New York Quietly Ended Its Street Drug War by Max Daly (“New data analyzed by VICE News reveals a monumental drop in arrests and convictions for low level drug crime in NYC, as the city finally tries to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on VICE: How New York Quietly Ended Its Street Drug War

S.D.N.Y.: Opinion in affidavit that amount of drugs involved was enough for distribution was not a Franks issue

The affidavit for a phone warrant for an electronic boarding pass was issued with probable cause. The affidavit statement that the amount of drugs was enough for “distribution” was neither false nor reckless, just because defendant disagrees with it. United … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Opinion in affidavit that amount of drugs involved was enough for distribution was not a Franks issue