Monthly Archives: May 2020

MA: Def gets limited discovery into CI’s reliability otherwise not provided by state

Massachusetts court sees no need to intervene yet in a trial court’s limited discovery order for the CI’s reliability which was wanting in the affidavit. “If the Commonwealth feels that any document would reveal the informant’s identity, it can seek … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on MA: Def gets limited discovery into CI’s reliability otherwise not provided by state

MA: Police answering call to seized cell phone was unreasonable without SW

Defendant’s cell phone was seized by the police. A call came in about 74 minutes later, and it was answered. The state could have obtained a search warrant before that and did not, and it didn’t show that it couldn’t. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on MA: Police answering call to seized cell phone was unreasonable without SW

IA: 4A claim not properly made in motion for new trial; denied so it can come via post-conviction proceeding

Fourth Amendment claim made in motion for new trial is denied without prejudice to litigate it in a post-conviction proceeding. State v. Bell, 2020 Iowa App. LEXIS 521 (May 13, 2020). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing a motion … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IA: 4A claim not properly made in motion for new trial; denied so it can come via post-conviction proceeding

SC: Def gets to litigate possible Mitchell exceptions on remand

Defendant is entitled to a remand to litigate whether a Mitchell warrantless BAC exception applies. State v. Key, 2020 S.C. LEXIS 71 (May 13, 2020). Defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied by the good faith exception where obtaining of … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on SC: Def gets to litigate possible Mitchell exceptions on remand

CA11: Shooting passenger in a car used as a weapon unreasonable

Shooting a passenger in a car that was allegedly used as a weapon was unreasonable because the passenger had no control over the car and his shooting wouldn’t stop the car. Robinson v. Rankin, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15297 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA11: Shooting passenger in a car used as a weapon unreasonable

LA1: Claim probation violation warrant lacked justification that led to search incident has to be argued on appeal

Defendant claimed his probation violation arrest warrant was defective and then argued the search incident to his arrest was thus invalid. On appeal, he doesn’t argue the validity of the arrest warrant, so the argument is waived. State v. Anglin, … Continue reading

Posted in Search incident, Standards of review, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA1: Claim probation violation warrant lacked justification that led to search incident has to be argued on appeal

OH9: When trial court relies on video of stop and search, failure to include in record on appeal is waiver

The trial court relied on the video of the stop and search, but it was not included by the defense in the record on appeal. This is considered waiver. State v. Hays, 2020-Ohio-2919, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1869 (9th Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH9: When trial court relies on video of stop and search, failure to include in record on appeal is waiver

MN: REP in hotel registry information under state constitution

A hotel customer has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the hotel’s registry information about the customer from government intrusion, at least with reasonable suspicion under the state constitution. The statute permitting inspection is constitutional with this limitation. The officer’s … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, State constitution | Comments Off on MN: REP in hotel registry information under state constitution

MT: Knock-and-talk led to forced entry based on exigency of officers being made

A Montana DTF was tipped off to defendant bringing a cache of heroin to a motel to distribute. Officers set up surveillance and recognized local drug dealers coming and going. They called for uniformed backup and attempted a knock-and-talk which … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk | Comments Off on MT: Knock-and-talk led to forced entry based on exigency of officers being made

WSJ: Coronavirus Demands a Privacy Law

WSJ: Coronavirus Demands a Privacy Law by Christine Wilson (“Silicon Valley’s role in contact tracing and social-distancing enforcement has Americans worried.”):

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WSJ: Coronavirus Demands a Privacy Law

CA5: 4 questions in 35 seconds at immigration checkpoint were reasonable

Four questions in 35 seconds at an immigration checkpoint were reasonable and for immigration purposes, not general crime control. United States v. Avery, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15034 (5th Cir. May 11, 2020). A random LPN check showed the owner’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Immigration checkpoints, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: 4 questions in 35 seconds at immigration checkpoint were reasonable

ME: No REP in paperwork kept in prison

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his prison paperwork under Hudson v. Palmer or state law. If legal mail were involved, plaintiff would have to show actual injury [n.5]. Anctil v. Cassese, 2020 ME 59, 2020 Me. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Prison and jail searches, Warrant execution | Comments Off on ME: No REP in paperwork kept in prison

VA: Fear of suicide attempt objectively justified warrantless entry as facts developed

Officers had an objectively reasonable basis for an entry and sweep under the emergency aid exception. Defendant was reportedly suicidal, wasn’t communicating at first, and then strange sounds were coming from where he was. “Based on these troubling circumstances, the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Seizure | Comments Off on VA: Fear of suicide attempt objectively justified warrantless entry as facts developed

LawOfficer.com: What if police were ordered to search homes in violation of the Fourth Amendment?

LawOfficer.com: What if police were ordered to search homes in violation of the Fourth Amendment? by Jim McNeff:

Posted in Police misconduct | Comments Off on LawOfficer.com: What if police were ordered to search homes in violation of the Fourth Amendment?

CA7: Even though the 4A was complied with, if the question is relevance or prejudice, a motion in limine is proper, not a motion to suppress

Just because the Fourth Amendment was complied with doesn’t mean that the evidence seized is relevant (Rule 401) or the evidence could be more prejudicial than relevant (Rule 403). Then, suppression isn’t the remedy – a motion in limine is. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Arrest or entry on arrest, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA7: Even though the 4A was complied with, if the question is relevance or prejudice, a motion in limine is proper, not a motion to suppress

E.D.Ky.: No discovery on ID of CI; not material to any 4A issue

Defendant was subjected to controlled buys with a CI that led to his search warrant. The officers involved can testify to what happened, and defendant hasn’t shown necessity for disclosure of the informant. “Additionally, to the extent that some information … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: No discovery on ID of CI; not material to any 4A issue

MA: DNA swab taken by consent during arrest without PC is suppressed, but state can do it over on remand

Defendant was arrested for murder, handcuffed and taken in for interrogation, all without probable cause. His statement was suppressed, and the state fails to show that obtaining his buccal swab during this time would clear even the low bar for … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA | Comments Off on MA: DNA swab taken by consent during arrest without PC is suppressed, but state can do it over on remand

MI Const. search and seizure provision is not coextensive with 4A

The Michigan Supreme Court sets aside part of a Court of Appeals decision that says that the Michigan Constitution’s search and seizure provision is coextensive with the Fourth Amendment because it’s not. Otherwise, it declines review of the decision. People … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, State constitution | Comments Off on MI Const. search and seizure provision is not coextensive with 4A

D.P.R.: Def driver had to somehow independently show ownership or control of vehicle for standing under CA1 precedent

When the vehicle stopped isn’t owned by the driver, he has to come forward with something showing standing. “However, Mr. Hernández-Marín failed to bring testimony other than himself to prove possession, control or ownership of the Dodge RAM pick-up truck … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Def driver had to somehow independently show ownership or control of vehicle for standing under CA1 precedent

NE: Def’s purse could be searched under automobile exception even though it had already been removed from car

Defendant’s purse was validly searched under the automobile exception after the backup officer smelled marijuana coming from the car. It didn’t matter that it wasn’t in the car at the time of the search. State v. Lang, 305 Neb. 726 … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NE: Def’s purse could be searched under automobile exception even though it had already been removed from car