Daily Archives: May 5, 2020

E.D.Tex.: Searching a car more than once isn’t a 4A violation

“The fact that Detective Nance searched portions of the vehicle more than once did not violate the Fourth Amendment.” Mendoza v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68469 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2020). The exclusionary rule does not apply in … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Searching a car more than once isn’t a 4A violation

OH4: Folded piece of paper wasn’t plain feel during stop and frisk

A folded piece of paper couldn’t be searched in a stop and frisk and plain feel because the contents weren’t felt. State v. McClure, 2020-Ohio-1574, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1524 (4th Dist. Apr. 16, 2020). “The search warrant was sufficiently … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Particularity | Comments Off on OH4: Folded piece of paper wasn’t plain feel during stop and frisk

CA9: In California, the smell of marijuana alone coming from a car no longer provides PC

In California, the smell of marijuana alone coming from a car no longer provides probable cause for search of the car. United States v. Martinez, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 12536 (9th Cir. Apr. 20, 2020):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA9: In California, the smell of marijuana alone coming from a car no longer provides PC

N.D.Ill.: Court approves SW for electronic devices believed connected to counterfeiting offenses in SW for home

“The government has presented an application for a warrant to search a townhome for evidence of trafficking in counterfeit United States currency. Among the items identified by the government for search and seizure are electronic devices located in the premises. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Court approves SW for electronic devices believed connected to counterfeiting offenses in SW for home

OH12: Def was detained without RS and search for arrest on outstanding warrant should have been suppressed

Defendant was detained by three officers and told to wait in her van while one ran her name. The detention lacked reasonable suspicion, and search incident to the arrest for an outstanding warrant was unreasonable and should have been suppressed. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH12: Def was detained without RS and search for arrest on outstanding warrant should have been suppressed

CA5: PC to search and seize doesn’t require that a crime actually have been committed

Plaintiff’s argument that there was no gambling crime for a search to occur is “fantasy” — the question is probable cause to believe a crime occurred, not whether one actually did. Lucky Tunes #3 LLC v. Smith, 2020 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA5: PC to search and seize doesn’t require that a crime actually have been committed

CA7: Anonymous call of suspicious person lacked corroboration and wasn’t RS

This anonymous tip revealed nothing but identifying characteristics, and it didn’t show reasonable suspicion. “Additionally, the tip itself contained no further indicia of the informant’s reliability. It also offered nothing but a barebones description of the suspect: the caller identified … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Anonymous call of suspicious person lacked corroboration and wasn’t RS

ID: Def’s probationary status was admissible at trial to show context for probation search, not as propensity evidence

The fact defendant was on probation was admissible at trial, not as propensity evidence, but to show context for the probation search and why defendant’s underwear was searched. State v. Jones, 2020 Ida. LEXIS 95 (May 4, 2020). Automatic license … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on ID: Def’s probationary status was admissible at trial to show context for probation search, not as propensity evidence

E.D.Ky.: Fire chief could consent to search of dept. owned laptop in possession of a Lt. (his son)

Defendant was a lieutenant in the fire department, and his father was the chief. He was using a city owned laptop. After he was arrested for exposing himself in a Walmart bathroom, dad had the apparent and actual authority to … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Fire chief could consent to search of dept. owned laptop in possession of a Lt. (his son)

reason.com: How to Track COVID-19 Without Mass Surveillance

reason.com: How to Track COVID-19 Without Mass Surveillance by Zach Weissmueller (“Apple and Google’s Bluetooth-based app would reportedly be voluntary and anonymous. Privacy advocates say we should accept nothing less.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on reason.com: How to Track COVID-19 Without Mass Surveillance

E.D.Ky.: Ambiguities in affidavit for SW not a Franks violation

Alleged ambiguities in the affidavit for the search warrant didn’t show a Franks violation where there clearly was probable cause. United States v. Jenkins, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69247 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 21, 2020). A 911 call from a cell … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Ambiguities in affidavit for SW not a Franks violation