Monthly Archives: June 2019

N.D.Cal.: 41-day delay from seizure to search of a cell phone wasn’t constitutionally unreasonable on these facts

41-day delay between seizure of cell phone and its search, while not good, wasn’t constitutionally unreasonable under all the circumstances, primarily because defendant was in custody and couldn’t use the phone anyway, so it didn’t intrude on his possessory interests. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: 41-day delay from seizure to search of a cell phone wasn’t constitutionally unreasonable on these facts

CA6 applies GFE to Carpenter on remand, and he still loses

The SCA was the law prior to Carpenter, so the good faith exception applies. From the date of Carpenter, the Fourth Amendment applies: “Carpenter II confirmed that the SCA does not immunize a government officer’s collection of CSLI from the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, SCOTUS | Comments Off on CA6 applies GFE to Carpenter on remand, and he still loses

N.D.Iowa: Suppression hearing review isn’t de novo; it’s whether there is a substantial basis for finding PC

The district court’s duty at a suppression hearing is not de novo review of probable cause – it’s whether there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the issuing magistrate that there was probable cause. United States v. Mohring, … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Suppression hearing review isn’t de novo; it’s whether there is a substantial basis for finding PC

WaPo: Perspective: Don’t smile for surveillance: Why airport face scans are a privacy trap

WaPo: Perspective: Don’t smile for surveillance: Why airport face scans are a privacy trap by Geoffrey A. Fowler: Facial-recognition technology is un proven and largely unregulated — yet it is already arriving at airports all over the United States. At … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Perspective: Don’t smile for surveillance: Why airport face scans are a privacy trap

Courthouse News Service: California Democrats Push to Ban Facial Recognition Tech

Courthouse News Service: California Democrats Push to Ban Facial Recognition Tech: The dispute intensified Tuesday as California Democrats voted to prohibit the use of facial recognition in body cameras, setting the proposed ban up for a final vote on the … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Courthouse News Service: California Democrats Push to Ban Facial Recognition Tech

The Recorder: Amazon’s Alexa Devices Violate Children’s Privacy, Class Actions Say

The Recorder: Amazon’s Alexa Devices Violate Children’s Privacy, Class Actions Say by Amanda Bronstad: A pair of class actions seek statutory damages on behalf of children in nine states whose conversations were recorded by an Alexa-enabled device, like Echo and … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Recorder: Amazon’s Alexa Devices Violate Children’s Privacy, Class Actions Say

CA8: Hotel staff photographed evidence of drug use in room which corroborated CI

The information in the search warrant application was sufficient to show a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime would be found in a hotel room registered to a known drug user who had recently tested positive for … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA8: Hotel staff photographed evidence of drug use in room which corroborated CI

Cal.4: Anticipating that def would drive without headlights isn’t RS for a stop

Defendant was stopped for being parked with only foglights on, the officer thinking that he was about to drive without headlights on, but the stop wasn’t justified. (A kind of anticipatory reasonable suspicion.) People v. Kidd, 2019 Cal. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.4: Anticipating that def would drive without headlights isn’t RS for a stop

W.D.Wash.: A potential claim of excessive force during a search doesn’t justify discovery of other alleged incidents of excessive force during searches

Defendant plans a suppression motion claiming that the search was invalid for use of excessive force during the search. He seeks discovery of other allegations of excessive force during searches by the officers, and it’s denied as speculative. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: A potential claim of excessive force during a search doesn’t justify discovery of other alleged incidents of excessive force during searches

S.D.Fla.: Waving a gun at a crowd is PC for assault

Defendant’s waving a gun at a crowd was probable cause, and it was on video. United States v. Leonard, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97917 (S.D. Fla. June 11, 2019).* “The defendants have not shown that Det. Miller was reckless or … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Waving a gun at a crowd is PC for assault

CO: Law of the case doesn’t bar consideration of undecided arguments to support a search

Law of the case isn’t always completely binding but usually is, and it certainly permits the trial court to consider other issues not decided in the original appeal against suppression of the evidence. People v. Morehead, 2019 CO 48, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on CO: Law of the case doesn’t bar consideration of undecided arguments to support a search

OH12: Automobile exception search permits search of locked toolbox

With a dog alert on a car, the search of a locked toolbox under the automobile exception was permissible. State v. Sullivan, 2019-Ohio-2279, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 2372 (12th Dist. June 10, 2019). Exigent circumstances could not be used to … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH12: Automobile exception search permits search of locked toolbox

Reason: The Costs of Monitoring Your Prescriptions

Reason: The Costs of Monitoring Your Prescriptions by Jackob Sullum: State databases that track the medications we take invade our privacy without reducing opioid-related deaths.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Reason: The Costs of Monitoring Your Prescriptions

NYTimes: Opinion: Want to See My Genes? Get a Warrant

NYTimes: Opinion: Want to See My Genes? Get a Warrant by Elizabeth Joh: Should the police be able to investigate your genetic family tree for any crime, no matter how minor?

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on NYTimes: Opinion: Want to See My Genes? Get a Warrant

Wired: A Murder Trial Will Allow DNA Evidence from a Genealogy Site

Wired: A Murder Trial Will Allow DNA Evidence from a Genealogy Site by Megan Molten:

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Wired: A Murder Trial Will Allow DNA Evidence from a Genealogy Site

CA6: No QI immunity in an alleged unreasonable opposite sex strip search at jail with alleged unreasonable touching

Plaintiff overcame qualified immunity in her suit against five male jailers who stripped searched her and allegedly touched her genitalia and breasts when she was nude in wrestling her on the floor at book-in. Because of a spit mask they … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: No QI immunity in an alleged unreasonable opposite sex strip search at jail with alleged unreasonable touching

CA6: State sanctioned blood draws of newborns and keeping the samples stated 4A claim

Plaintiffs stated a Fourth Amendment claim that the state took blood samples from children to check for diseases and then retained them in the Michigan Neonatal Biorepository. Remanded for further consideration. Kanuszewski v. Michigan Dept. of Health and Human Services, … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: State sanctioned blood draws of newborns and keeping the samples stated 4A claim

NYTimes: Opinion: How Facial Recognition Makes You Safer

NYTimes: Opinion: How Facial Recognition Makes You Safer by James O’Neill, New York police commissioner: Used properly, the software effectively identifies crime suspects without violating rights.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Opinion: How Facial Recognition Makes You Safer

E.D.N.Y.: Assuming pawn shops are closely regulated businesses, ptfs stated a claim under § 1983 for arbitrary and unreasonable enforcement

Assuming pawn shops are closely regulated business, in this § 1983 case against arbitrary and unreasonable administrative searches under Burger, plaintiffs survive summary judgment. There is a police memo attempting to limit the exercise of police discretion, but the city … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Assuming pawn shops are closely regulated businesses, ptfs stated a claim under § 1983 for arbitrary and unreasonable enforcement

D.Me.: False name justified extending traffic stop for dog sniff

“The dog sniff began roughly 12 minutes and 45 seconds into the traffic stop. At that point, Martin had provided two driver’s licenses that spelled his name differently and had verbally provided a separate birth date that did not match … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Me.: False name justified extending traffic stop for dog sniff