CA6: No QI immunity in an alleged unreasonable opposite sex strip search at jail with alleged unreasonable touching

Plaintiff overcame qualified immunity in her suit against five male jailers who stripped searched her and allegedly touched her genitalia and breasts when she was nude in wrestling her on the floor at book-in. Because of a spit mask they put on her, her vision was impaired but she claimed more than one of the five involved unreasonably touched her, and, as to the rest, failure to stop it is a claim. There are questions of fact for trial. Fazica v. Jordan, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 17307 (6th Cir. June 10, 2019).

Defendant lists a host of material that was omitted from the affidavit for the search warrant. Assuming that he can meet the first threshold of it being intentional or reckless, it isn’t material at all. Even if the affidavit were corrected, there was probable cause. United States v. Akroush, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95580 (D. D.C. June 5, 2019).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.