Monthly Archives: March 2019

WaPo: DEA’s bulk collection of phone data ‘raised significant legal questions’

WaPo: DEA’s bulk collection of phone data ‘raised significant legal questions’ by Joe Davidson:

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: DEA’s bulk collection of phone data ‘raised significant legal questions’

TN: IAC claim re SW fails because SW isn’t in appellate record

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim about defense counsel’s handling of an alleged defective search warrant claim couldn’t be considered on appeal where nobody put the search warrant in the appellate record. Holland v. State, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: IAC claim re SW fails because SW isn’t in appellate record

NH: Cell phone SW for pictures and texts in a homicide case was particular

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone was still particular enough for photographs that could be tied to text messages in a murder case. Even deleted photographs were subject to recovery. State v. Page, 2019 N.H. LEXIS 53 (Mar. 19, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on NH: Cell phone SW for pictures and texts in a homicide case was particular

Lexology: Has Investigative Genealogy Become the Wild, Wild West?

Lexology: Has Investigative Genealogy Become the Wild, Wild West? by Kathleen E. Dion

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Lexology: Has Investigative Genealogy Become the Wild, Wild West?

PA: “The Fourth Amendment does not have a time limit; it protects individuals from unreasonable seizures, no matter how brief.”

“The Fourth Amendment does not have a time limit; it protects individuals from unreasonable seizures, no matter how brief.” The brief detention here wasn’t based on reasonable suspicion and implicated the Fourth Amendment. Commonwealth v. Adams, 2019 Pa. LEXIS 1734 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on PA: “The Fourth Amendment does not have a time limit; it protects individuals from unreasonable seizures, no matter how brief.”

D.N.M.: When standing depends on permission to drive another’s car, the standing of the other has to be shown, too

When a defendant claims standing based on another’s right to possess, he has to prove the other person had standing, too. Reasonable suspicion for this stop was based on a traffic violation and suspicion the occupants in the vehicle were … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.N.M.: When standing depends on permission to drive another’s car, the standing of the other has to be shown, too

techdirt: Utah Senate Passes Bill That Would Lock The Government Out Of Warrantless Access To Third Party Records

techdirt: Utah Senate Passes Bill That Would Lock The Government Out Of Warrantless Access To Third Party Records by Tim Cushing: Perhaps no state has unrolled and rolled up a welcome mat set out for a federal guest faster than … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on techdirt: Utah Senate Passes Bill That Would Lock The Government Out Of Warrantless Access To Third Party Records

NBC15: Frustration over spike in gun violence prompts district push for police checkpoints

NBC15: Frustration over spike in gun violence prompts district push for police checkpoints by Nicole Fierro: MOBILE, Ala. (WPMI) — Frustration over heightened gun violence is driving councilmembers to propose new actions. However, Mobile’s public safety director says some ideas … Continue reading

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on NBC15: Frustration over spike in gun violence prompts district push for police checkpoints

Reason: Hit & Run blog: Going to Burning Man? The Feds Want You Searched for Drugs

Reason: Hit & Run blog: Going to Burning Man? The Feds Want You Searched for Drugs by Brian Doherty Can the government demand a warrantless search with no probable cause of ticket holders as a condition of issuing an event … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Roadblocks | Comments Off on Reason: Hit & Run blog: Going to Burning Man? The Feds Want You Searched for Drugs

WA: It’s defendant’s burden to show a seizure occurred

“An appellant making an unconstitutional seizure claim has the burden of proving that a seizure occurred. … [¶] Here, Yang consented to Koster’s entry. Throughout their time in the house, Lucas and Koster told Ho what they were doing. They … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: It’s defendant’s burden to show a seizure occurred

AZ: Probation search could reasonably include cell phone because of nature of allegations

Defendant on felony probation and subject to a warrantless search condition. It was reasonable to search his cell phone under this condition because his mother reported threats and it was possible the cell phone’s contents could corroborate it. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Search incident | Comments Off on AZ: Probation search could reasonably include cell phone because of nature of allegations

D.S.C.: Forced catheterization of children for UA stated a 4A claim

Plaintiff stated a claim that forced catheterization of her children for a UA was a Fourth Amendment violation. Whether there was consent in the face of an alleged threat to take the children without a UA also goes to a … Continue reading

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Forced catheterization of children for UA stated a 4A claim

KnowTechie: LA wants rideshare scooter companies to share your location data with them

KnowTechie: LA wants rideshare scooter companies to share your location data with them by Joe Rice-Jones: Maybe this will stop the number of abandoned scooters.

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on KnowTechie: LA wants rideshare scooter companies to share your location data with them

CA5: Ptf’s 4A claims were Heck barred because they would interfere with the state prosecution.

Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims were Heck barred because they would interfere with the state prosecution. Shipman v. Sowell, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 8736 (5th Cir. Mar. 23, 2019):

Posted in Abstention | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s 4A claims were Heck barred because they would interfere with the state prosecution.

IN: Officer at front door to do knock-and-talk could look through gap in blinds

Officer who was at front of house to do a knock and talk did not conduct an illegal search when he heard noise inside and looked through a gap in the blinds. Jardines is distinguished, and the court used the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on IN: Officer at front door to do knock-and-talk could look through gap in blinds

S.D.N.Y.: AirBnB can’t block all discovery of customer’s third-party records

In AirBnB’s case against NYC, the city gets discovery of some of AirBnB’s customer records because it is third-party information subject to disclosure at least to determine the extent of an expectation of privacy. AirBnB, Inc. v. City of New … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: AirBnB can’t block all discovery of customer’s third-party records

E.D.N.Y.: Def did nothing to show his standing in the car or the things seized from it

Reasonable suspicion supported the stop for no license plate light. Then, defendant lacks a reasonable expectation of privacy in the car or its contents. “However, neither Defendant’s affidavit nor the evidence adduced at the hearing establish that Defendant had any … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def did nothing to show his standing in the car or the things seized from it

NY4: State didn’t show that CI actually existed; reversed

The state didn’t make a sufficient showing required by NY law that the CI actually existed. The motion to suppress should have been granted. People v. Givans, 2019 NY Slip Op 02220, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2237 (4th Dept. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Particularity, Staleness | Comments Off on NY4: State didn’t show that CI actually existed; reversed

D.P.R.: Factual assertion in SW affidavit based on inference was reasonable and not false

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails. The officer’s assertion of fact was a reasonable inference based on what he saw and wasn’t false. United States v. Cruz-Arroyo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47172 (D. P.R. Mar. 19, 2019).* Defendant’s Franks challenge fails for … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Factual assertion in SW affidavit based on inference was reasonable and not false

E.D.Cal.: Unsealing of SW materials not granted preindictment

The Sacramento Bee and defendant seek unsealing of search warrant materials in an extradition matter, but the motion is denied. Extradition is different than prosecution. If a criminal prosecution will result in the United States, and it still could, the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Unsealing of SW materials not granted preindictment