D.S.C.: Forced catheterization of children for UA stated a 4A claim

Plaintiff stated a claim that forced catheterization of her children for a UA was a Fourth Amendment violation. Whether there was consent in the face of an alleged threat to take the children without a UA also goes to a jury. Hunter v. South Dakota Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49224 (D. S.C. Mar. 25, 2019).

This case is virtually identical to one filed by plaintiff in 2016 and dismissed, and res judicata applies. Britton v. No. Southaven, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49273 (N.D. Miss. Mar. 25, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Border search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.