Daily Archives: March 2, 2019

CA9: Credibility findings re drug dog and handler are binding on appeal

Defendant’s package was opened in transit with a warrant after a dog sniff. After a three day suppression hearing, the district court found the dog handler credible and there was no misrepresentation of facts concerning the dog’s accuracy or training. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA9: Credibility findings re drug dog and handler are binding on appeal

CA9: Injunctive relief against records surreptitiously collected is a possible remedy for a 4A violation

In a wide ranging case against the FBI for conducting covert surveillance in a mosque and targeting Muslims allegedly solely based on their religion, the court holds that injunctive relief to expunge what was seized is a possible remedy for … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA9: Injunctive relief against records surreptitiously collected is a possible remedy for a 4A violation

D.Md.: A waived motion to suppress by a guilty plea, no matter the likelihood of success, is not actual innocence

The potential of a successful motion to suppress that was waived by a guilty plea is not “actual innocence” for post-conviction tolling. “Regardless, Yansane’s claim that he now has evidence of legal innocence fails because a potentially successful motion to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Md.: A waived motion to suppress by a guilty plea, no matter the likelihood of success, is not actual innocence

PA: Safety concerns are proper concerns for placement of a DUI checkpoint

“The selection and operation of the roadblock checkpoint was in substantial compliance with the Tarbert/Blouse guidelines.” Safety concerns are a proper concern in selection of the place for a DUI checkpoint. Commonwealth v. Mercado, 2019 PA Super 63, 2019 Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on PA: Safety concerns are proper concerns for placement of a DUI checkpoint

W.D.Pa.: Defense counsel’s decisions about motions to suppress are strategic under Strickland

In a post-conviction petition, defense counsel’s decisions about motions to suppress are strategic for Strickland purposes. Bagley v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31040 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2019). Defendant’s objection to the R&R for his lack of standing … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Defense counsel’s decisions about motions to suppress are strategic under Strickland

D.N.M.: Meth possession is a ‘serious crime’ for purposes of a warrantless entry into a home for the destruction-of-evidence exception

The court “will not suppress the evidence obtained pursuant to the BCSO deputies’ search. The Court agrees with the United States’ contentions that the BCSO deputies acted reasonably when they entered Cruz’ home without a warrant, because they satisfy the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Meth possession is a ‘serious crime’ for purposes of a warrantless entry into a home for the destruction-of-evidence exception