Daily Archives: March 13, 2019

CA6: No QI for stopping ptf for “flipp[ing] him the bird”

Officer Minard stopped the plaintiff for a minor traffic offense, and he let her off with a warning. Despite the break, she “flipped him the bird,” and the officer blue lighted her again and this time ran into her trying … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: No QI for stopping ptf for “flipp[ing] him the bird”

CNN: ICE supervisors sometimes skip required review of detention warrants, emails show

CNN: ICE supervisors sometimes skip required review of detention warrants, emails show by Bob Ortega: (CNN)Brent Oxley, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement deportation officer in Little Rock, Arkansas, was happy in his work, which he says “gave me the feeling … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CNN: ICE supervisors sometimes skip required review of detention warrants, emails show

S.D.Ohio: An observation in the premises before SW was sought was excluded from consideration and PC still existed

A walk through of defendant’s premises before seeking a search warrant resulted in observation of digital scales and that observation got into the search warrant application. Excluding that still resulted in probable cause. United States v. Baker, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: An observation in the premises before SW was sought was excluded from consideration and PC still existed

D.Colo.: One federal court’s practical explanation of how to analyze a particularity problem.

This is one federal court’s practical explanation of how to analyze a particularity problem. United States v. Suggs, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38071 (D. Colo. Mar. 11, 2019). The search warrants were particular enough.

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on D.Colo.: One federal court’s practical explanation of how to analyze a particularity problem.