Daily Archives: March 14, 2019

CA11: Strip club survives summary judgment on unreasonable search claim when it was raided by 36 officers including SWAT team

A strip club was subjected to a raid with 36 officers, including the SWAT team. People were manhandled during the raid. The plaintiff club stated a claim sufficient to overcome summary judgment that the raid and search was unreasonable. WBY, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Strip club survives summary judgment on unreasonable search claim when it was raided by 36 officers including SWAT team

CNBC: Robert Kraft case reveals how police can secretly install cameras inside a private business

CNBC: Robert Kraft case reveals how police can secretly install cameras inside a private business by Scott Zamost, Hannah Kliot, and Bianca Fortis:

Posted in Sneak and Peek | Comments Off on CNBC: Robert Kraft case reveals how police can secretly install cameras inside a private business

NY2: Jail call here was more prejudicial than relevant and should have been excluded

Admission of defendant’s jail call here was more prejudicial than relevant because it omitted context. The jury was at a loss as to what arrest was being talked about. People v. Robinson, 2019 NY Slip Op 01799, 2019 N.Y. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY2: Jail call here was more prejudicial than relevant and should have been excluded

Tennessee finally adopts the good faith exception under Herring

Tennessee finally adopts the good faith exception. State v. McElrath, 2019 Tenn. LEXIS 100 (Mar. 12, 2019) (concurring-dissenting 1; concurring-dissenting 2):

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on Tennessee finally adopts the good faith exception under Herring

CA1: Cell phones are not tracking devices, following CA7 & 3

“In affirming, we reject his arguments that there was error in the issuance of precise location information warrants (‘PLI warrants’) by a magistrate judge in Maine on a finding of probable cause, which allowed monitoring of the locations of Ackies’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA1: Cell phones are not tracking devices, following CA7 & 3

N.D.Fla.: 2254 doesn’t give jurisdiction over state law search and seizure claims

Defendant’s habeas claim that state law wasn’t followed in issuing a search warrant doesn’t state a 2254 claim. [Aside from Stone v. Powell, of course.] Roland v. Sec’y, Dept. of Correction, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40581 (N.D. Fla. Mar. 13, … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: 2254 doesn’t give jurisdiction over state law search and seizure claims

CA11: Nearby drug dog helped expedite and detention was reasonable

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s detention for a drug dog. It also helped expedite matters that a drug dog was across the street from the stop. United States v. Rodriguez, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 7236 (11th Cir. Mar. 12, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Nearby drug dog helped expedite and detention was reasonable

M.D.N.C.: Lack of explanation of how IAC search claim would have prevailed is insufficient

2255 argument that defense counsel was ineffective for not arguing a search issue fails for not elaborating on what that argument should have been and for not including the search warrant materials. Byrd v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on M.D.N.C.: Lack of explanation of how IAC search claim would have prevailed is insufficient