Daily Archives: March 10, 2019

NE: Search of the person here was valid an an inventory at the jail

The search of defendant’s person at the jail after his arrest was valid as an inventory search. State v. Garcia, 302 Neb. 406 (Mar. 8, 2019). “As set forth above, the undersigned does not agree with Defendant that the affidavit … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on NE: Search of the person here was valid an an inventory at the jail

D.N.M.: Citizen informants saw shooting, and video surveillance caught image of def’s car at the time, and that was PC for arrest

Citizen informants saw a shooting from a vehicle and area video surveillance caught an image of defendant’s car. Police looked, and he was convicted felon. There was thus probable cause for defendant’s arrest. United States v. Cotto, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Citizen informants saw shooting, and video surveillance caught image of def’s car at the time, and that was PC for arrest

S.D.Fla.: There is no constitutional right of a defendant to testify at a suppression hearing

The right to testify at a trial doesn’t also mean that a defendant has a constitutional right to testify at a suppression hearing. Here, defendant wasn’t even present at the suppression hearing. The court finds that defense counsel wasn’t ineffective … Continue reading

Posted in Suppression hearings | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: There is no constitutional right of a defendant to testify at a suppression hearing

CA8: Arguable probable cause for arrest gives QI

“The totality of the circumstances at the time of the arrest, as described above, were sufficient for Svajgl to believe that Nader had committed or was committing the offense of possessing child pornography.” Arguable probable cause is all that’s required … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Arguable probable cause for arrest gives QI

D.Ariz.: Carpenter doesn’t change the third-party doctrine as to IP information

Carpenter doesn’t change the third-party doctrine as to IP information. United States v. McCutchin, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36811 (D. Ariz. Mar. 7, 2019). The affidavits “are somewhat thin,” but this is deferential, not de novo, review, and, while this … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standards of review, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Carpenter doesn’t change the third-party doctrine as to IP information