Daily Archives: March 25, 2019

KnowTechie: LA wants rideshare scooter companies to share your location data with them

KnowTechie: LA wants rideshare scooter companies to share your location data with them by Joe Rice-Jones: Maybe this will stop the number of abandoned scooters.

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on KnowTechie: LA wants rideshare scooter companies to share your location data with them

CA5: Ptf’s 4A claims were Heck barred because they would interfere with the state prosecution.

Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims were Heck barred because they would interfere with the state prosecution. Shipman v. Sowell, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 8736 (5th Cir. Mar. 23, 2019):

Posted in Abstention | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s 4A claims were Heck barred because they would interfere with the state prosecution.

IN: Officer at front door to do knock-and-talk could look through gap in blinds

Officer who was at front of house to do a knock and talk did not conduct an illegal search when he heard noise inside and looked through a gap in the blinds. Jardines is distinguished, and the court used the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on IN: Officer at front door to do knock-and-talk could look through gap in blinds

S.D.N.Y.: AirBnB can’t block all discovery of customer’s third-party records

In AirBnB’s case against NYC, the city gets discovery of some of AirBnB’s customer records because it is third-party information subject to disclosure at least to determine the extent of an expectation of privacy. AirBnB, Inc. v. City of New … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: AirBnB can’t block all discovery of customer’s third-party records

E.D.N.Y.: Def did nothing to show his standing in the car or the things seized from it

Reasonable suspicion supported the stop for no license plate light. Then, defendant lacks a reasonable expectation of privacy in the car or its contents. “However, neither Defendant’s affidavit nor the evidence adduced at the hearing establish that Defendant had any … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def did nothing to show his standing in the car or the things seized from it

NY4: State didn’t show that CI actually existed; reversed

The state didn’t make a sufficient showing required by NY law that the CI actually existed. The motion to suppress should have been granted. People v. Givans, 2019 NY Slip Op 02220, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2237 (4th Dept. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Particularity, Staleness | Comments Off on NY4: State didn’t show that CI actually existed; reversed

D.P.R.: Factual assertion in SW affidavit based on inference was reasonable and not false

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails. The officer’s assertion of fact was a reasonable inference based on what he saw and wasn’t false. United States v. Cruz-Arroyo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47172 (D. P.R. Mar. 19, 2019).* Defendant’s Franks challenge fails for … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Factual assertion in SW affidavit based on inference was reasonable and not false