Monthly Archives: November 2018

M.D.Fla.: Whether a state court judge could issue a ping order that crossed state lines is governed by GFE

A state court judge issued a ping order and the phone crossed state lines. Was it a tracking order or an SCA order? “The Court sees no need to venture further into the quagmire of tracking devices, the SCA, and … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Whether a state court judge could issue a ping order that crossed state lines is governed by GFE

D.Ariz.: Raising a search issue 5 months after conviction is a little too late

Defendant’s suppression argument five months after conviction is too late. Besides, it doesn’t allege anything of substance anyway. United States v. Alahmedalabdaloklah, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189719 (D. Ariz. Nov. 6, 2018).* Defendant’s search claim is denied without even telling … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Raising a search issue 5 months after conviction is a little too late

CA8: Means and opportunity to commit bank robbery and carjacking in flight was PC

Defendant’s means and opportunity to commit this bank robbery and carjacking in flight was probable cause. Video showing him at a motel was nexus to his room. United States v. Evans, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 31326 (8th Cir. Nov. 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA8: Means and opportunity to commit bank robbery and carjacking in flight was PC

CA6: Marital privilege doesn’t apply to a recorded jail call

Marital privilege doesn’t apply to jail telephone calls defendant knew would be recorded because of the lack of a confidential communication. United States v. Ayala, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 31345 (6th Cir. Nov. 6, 2018). The Pennsylvania Wiretap Act is … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on CA6: Marital privilege doesn’t apply to a recorded jail call

CA7: Using several garage door openers in def’s vehicle to locate his stash house was a reasonable search

Defendant’s vehicle was stopped and several garage door openers were found. Using them to try to find defendant’s stash house was a search and it was reasonable, although close to the edge. United States v. Correa, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Search | Comments Off on CA7: Using several garage door openers in def’s vehicle to locate his stash house was a reasonable search

WaPo: Lawsuit targets Greyhound over warrantless stopping of buses by border agents

WaPo: Lawsuit targets Greyhound over warrantless stopping of buses by border agents by Spencer S. Hsu Lawyers for a California woman asked a state judge Thursday to order Greyhound Lines to stop allowing federal immigration agents to board its buses … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on WaPo: Lawsuit targets Greyhound over warrantless stopping of buses by border agents

We’re back, catching up

Perhaps you’ve noticed that the postings have been a bit behind. That’s because I’ve spent the last two weeks reading 2600 pages of page proofs for Trial Handbook for Arkansas Lawyers 4th. Today I have to drive two hours to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on We’re back, catching up

IL: Marital communications obtained by SW remained privileged

Confidential spousal communications obtained by a search warrant do not lose their privileged character. People v. Gliniewicz, 2018 IL App (2d) 170490, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS 818 (Nov. 2, 2018). The state seized text messages but didn’t disclose them in … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on IL: Marital communications obtained by SW remained privileged

CA4: Def’s cross of officer at trial on SW affidavit “opened the door” to def’s priors

Defendant’s cross examination of the officer who authored the affidavit for the search warrant to attack his credibility by the affidavit “opened the door” to defendant’s other crimes which were admitted under 404(b) on the government’s request on redirect. United … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA4: Def’s cross of officer at trial on SW affidavit “opened the door” to def’s priors

CA7: Message on cell phone screen when phone was seized could be testified to by officer

Defendant claimed he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the screen of his cell phone because it was in his pocket up until he was arrested. When the phone was removed from his pocket, a message appeared on the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA7: Message on cell phone screen when phone was seized could be testified to by officer

WaPo: Motel 6 agrees to pay up to $7.6 million to settle claim it helped ICE target Latino guests

WaPo: Motel 6 agrees to pay up to $7.6 million to settle claim it helped ICE target Latino guests by Lindsey Bever: After a nationwide class-action lawsuit against Motel 6, the chain agreed to pay as much as $7.6 million … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: Motel 6 agrees to pay up to $7.6 million to settle claim it helped ICE target Latino guests

N.D.Ga.: Car not abandoned by fleeing def because a co-def stayed with it

A car is not abandoned by the defendant merely because, when he fled, a confederate stayed behind. United States v. Gibbs, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187572 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 2, 2018). The audio recording of the police-citizen interaction has enough, … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Car not abandoned by fleeing def because a co-def stayed with it

OR: A bulge in def’s pocket was not RS for a patdown without more

The officer articulated no reason for the officer safety exception for searching defendant’s pockets. A bulge in defendant’s clothing was not enough. State v. Leach, 294 Ore. App. 639 (Nov. 2, 2018). “[W]e have held that the lawfulness of the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: A bulge in def’s pocket was not RS for a patdown without more

VA: Statute on filing warrant papers in court is procedural and suppression not the remedy

The statute requiring search warrant papers be filed with the circuit clerk is merely procedural, and it confers no substantive rights for its violation. Heroin in the car was visible from outside and thus in plain view, and that was … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on VA: Statute on filing warrant papers in court is procedural and suppression not the remedy

The Crime Report: Does the Fourth Amendment Block Cops from Using Artificial Intelligence?

The Crime Report: Does the Fourth Amendment Block Cops from Using Artificial Intelligence? by J. Gabriel Ware: The constitutional prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures could prevent law enforcement from using the sophisticated surveillance technology made possible by artificial intelligence, … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Crime Report: Does the Fourth Amendment Block Cops from Using Artificial Intelligence?

S.D.N.Y.: FISA application may be reviewed ex parte and in camera and still comply with due process; probable cause shown

A FISA application that led to a prosecution may be reviewed ex parte and in camera and remain under seal, and this complies with due process. “Here, having reviewed the FISC’s probable cause determinations while affording these findings the requisite … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: FISA application may be reviewed ex parte and in camera and still comply with due process; probable cause shown

S.D.N.Y.: Basic questions about def’s cell phone as a prelude to asking for consent to search it is an exception to Miranda

Basic questions about defendant’s cell phone as a prelude to asking for consent to search it is an exception to Miranda. United States v. Okparaeke, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188191 (S.D. N.Y. Nov. 3, 2018):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Basic questions about def’s cell phone as a prelude to asking for consent to search it is an exception to Miranda

KS: Def was removed from a van and her purse left behind; it wasn’t subject to search incident

Defendant was sitting in a van when she was gotten out and then arrested. Her purse was left behind. Her purse was not subject to a search incident when she’d been handcuffed and led away. The state’s argument that inevitable … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Search incident | Comments Off on KS: Def was removed from a van and her purse left behind; it wasn’t subject to search incident

NH: Def who borrowed car not prejudiced by five day delay in getting SW for it

Because defendant didn’t own the car he borrowed, he wasn’t prejudiced by the five day delay in getting a search warrant for it. State v. Stacey, 2018 N.H. LEXIS 208 (Nov. 2, 2018). State law requires automobile exception apply to … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NH: Def who borrowed car not prejudiced by five day delay in getting SW for it

D.R.I.: IP addresses def used weren’t like detailed tracking information from CSLI requiring a SW

Defendant’s use of IP addresses his computer signed in through isn’t enough like CSLI in Carpenter to require a search warrant. United States v. Monroe, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186998 (D. R.I. Nov. 1, 2018):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.R.I.: IP addresses def used weren’t like detailed tracking information from CSLI requiring a SW