D.Ariz.: Raising a search issue 5 months after conviction is a little too late

Defendant’s suppression argument five months after conviction is too late. Besides, it doesn’t allege anything of substance anyway. United States v. Alahmedalabdaloklah, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189719 (D. Ariz. Nov. 6, 2018).*

Defendant’s search claim is denied without even telling us what it is, it apparently was that insubstantial. United States v. Christian, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 31340 (10th Cir. Nov. 6, 2018).*

Defendant’s PO [clearly] had reasonable suspicion for a probation search: smell of marijuana in the house and a snapchat picture of defendant with a firearm. United States v. McGregor, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189051 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 10, 2018),* adopted, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187976 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 2, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.