Category Archives: Warrant requirement

CA5: SW for 320 CR 401 didn’t include 320A; telephonic warrant fails for lack of a record of what caused to issue

A search warrant for 320 CR 401 did not objectively include 320A CR 401, a different address and building 200 yards away with a separate electric meter, so summary judgment was improperly granted the police. In addition, a telephone warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off

TN: Procedural errors in handling the paperwork of a SW after execution are overlooked if no prejudice

Alleged mishandling of the paperwork on a search warrant for new DNA in a cold case hit could have resulted in a motion to suppress, but it’s not obvious that it would be granted because procedural defects in the return … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant requirement | Comments Off

CAAFlog: Argument Preview: Considering whether the Fourth Amendment requires a temporal limitation for a search in United States v. Richards, No. 16-0727/AF

CAAFlog: Argument Preview: Considering whether the Fourth Amendment requires a temporal limitation for a search in United States v. Richards, No. 16-0727/AF by Zachary D Spilman:

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off

IN: 4A doesn’t require a SW be obtained at the earliest possible time

Officers were tipped off to the defendant coming through with drugs eight hours before he was stopped. The stop was for speeding and weaving, and a drug dog was used which alerted. The fact the officers had eight hours warning … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off

W.D.Ky.: Typo in the affidavit for SW didn’t merit suppression; when corrected, no staleness

The wiretap underlying the search warrant has already been sustained by the USDJ, so that can’t support suppressing the search. Defendant’s Franks challenge to the affidavit because of the date is really just a typo (2004 v. 2012), so it … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off

LA5: Typo as to IP source in CP case was irrelevant to existence of probable cause

A typographical error as to defendant’s internet provider did not undermine the probable cause for the search warrant for his child pornography on his computer. It has nothing to do with the probable cause. State v. Shiell, 2016 La. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer searches, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off

IN: Cell phone photograph of SW sent to officer’s phone satisfied the statute for officer to have warrant for search

The officer here needed a search warrant for defendant’s blood for suspicion of DUI. When the warrant was issued, a photograph of it was sent to his cell phone. Defendant objected to the form of the warrant claiming that it … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off

W.D.N.Y.: USMJ accidentally crossing out a paragraph when a single sentence about no-knock was intended to be struck didn’t undermine PC; judge deciding the case made the mistake

The USMJ who issued the search warrant decides its validity. An entire paragraph was crossed out, but the court says that it only intended to cross out the no-knock authorization. Since the warrant was signed and the officers were directed … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off

LA rule permitting electronic warrant applications and issuance doesn’t violate 4A or Rule 41

The police got a search warrant from a Louisiana state judge by electronic means, but the case ended up in federal court. Louisiana’s criminal rule permitting electronic warrant applications does not violate the “oath or affirmation” requirement of the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Warrant requirement | Comments Off

D.V.I.: Telephonic warrant requirements were complied with and GFE didn’t apply

The telephonic search warrant here failed the requirements of Rule 41, including the verbatim reading of the warrant to the issuing judge, and didn’t mention that they also wanted to search a car that was omitted from the warrant. The … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off