Category Archives: Standing

OH9: Citizen informant’s 911 call properly admitted at suppression hearing even though hearsay

A 911 call from a citizen informant was properly admitted into evidence becuase hearsay is admissible in suppression hearings. There was a factual basis for defendant’s stop on reasonable suspicion for DUI. The CI’s report was that he was too … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH9: Citizen informant’s 911 call properly admitted at suppression hearing even though hearsay

D.P.R.: Being handed a bag for five seconds wasn’t enough to create standing

Analyzing bailments under PR law and First Circuit and SCOTUS cases (particularly Rawlings), defendant’s precipitous five second holding of a bag handed off to him wasn’t sufficient to create a bailment or give him standing in the bag. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Being handed a bag for five seconds wasn’t enough to create standing

CA1: Standing can’t be based on an untranslated document to put into evidence; even in D.P.R.

Defendant’s claim of standing in the home of another depends upon a Spanish language document [in PR federal court where everyone is bilingual] that was untranslated for the judge [and apparently not for appeal]. Therefore, his standing argument fails. But … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA1: Standing can’t be based on an untranslated document to put into evidence; even in D.P.R.

M.D.Pa.: On remand of Byrd, GFE applied to standing issue

On the Sixth Circuit’s remand of Byrd v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 1518 (2018), to the District Court, the court finds the good faith exception applies to standing issues arising before it was decided. United States v. Byrd, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: On remand of Byrd, GFE applied to standing issue

N.D.Ala.: Renting bedroom from homeowner and paying in drugs still gave renter standing; but owner had apparent authority to consent

Defendant lived in a drug dealer’s house where he rented the room in exchange for drugs. He had unfettered access to come and go. That gave him standing in his own room. The owner, however, also had unrestricted access to … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Renting bedroom from homeowner and paying in drugs still gave renter standing; but owner had apparent authority to consent

D.Me.: Even if omission was reckless, missing info only added to PC

Even if the officer’s omission was reckless or intentional, adding in the missing information only makes the probable cause stronger. Therefore, his Franks claim fails. United States v. O’Neal, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126426 (D. Me. July 30, 2019).* Defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.Me.: Even if omission was reckless, missing info only added to PC

KY: Officers approached men on a street corner talking; telling def to “hang tight for a minute” because he wanted to run his name and SSN was a seizure requiring RS

Officers saw a group on a corner, so they initiated contact, just because they wanted to. They also attempted to get them to clean up the trash on the corner, which wasn’t shown to be their fault or responsibility. When … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on KY: Officers approached men on a street corner talking; telling def to “hang tight for a minute” because he wanted to run his name and SSN was a seizure requiring RS

FL2: State doesn’t justify entry into motel room on any exigency after suspect’s arrest; standing raised too late

The court declines to remand for more evidence of standing when the state sat on the claim. The state’s protective sweep argument and associated search incident fails for its failure to show exigency for any entry or officer safety. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on FL2: State doesn’t justify entry into motel room on any exigency after suspect’s arrest; standing raised too late

FL2: Def gets benefit of Byrd where issue raised before it was decided; remanded

Defendant was not listed as an authorized driver of a rental car, and he moved to suppress the search of the rental car. Because his case was in “the pipeline,” he gets the benefit of Byrd and the case is … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on FL2: Def gets benefit of Byrd where issue raised before it was decided; remanded

D.Nev.: The fact def’s FIPF prior had a suspended sentence wasn’t material for Franks

A state telephonic search warrant was issued based on allegations that defendant was a felon in possession of a firearm. The fact he got a suspended sentence and it was omitted from the application for the warrant isn’t material. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.Nev.: The fact def’s FIPF prior had a suspended sentence wasn’t material for Franks

PA: DYS inspection order required PC

DYS obtained an inspection order to enter petitioner’s house, but it was issued without specific probable cause to believe any specific acts were occurring inside. Probable cause was required for the order to enter. In the Interest of D.R., 2019 … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Standing | Comments Off on PA: DYS inspection order required PC

MA: An unreasonable and overlong detention of the car is also one of the passengers

The mere fact the car was rented provided no indication to the officer that the defendant wasn’t permitted to drive it, thus no reasonable suspicion from that. Thus, the stop was unreasonably extended without reasonable suspicion. When the detention is … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on MA: An unreasonable and overlong detention of the car is also one of the passengers

D.Ariz.: Def failed to show standing at the place where he intermittently spent nights but no showing of when

Defendant failed to show standing in the home of another. He and his girlfriend had a key to the premises where he intermittently spent the night over a fair stretch of time, but there was no showing of when he … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Def failed to show standing at the place where he intermittently spent nights but no showing of when

N.D.Ill.: While def was in jail, he caused robbery evidence to be moved to his sister’s house; he’d been in jail a month by then and lacks standing

Defendant is accused of robbing an ATM technician. The search warrant for his place in Chicago was based on probable cause, and evidence linking him to the robbery was found there. After jail calls suggested evidence was moved to his … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: While def was in jail, he caused robbery evidence to be moved to his sister’s house; he’d been in jail a month by then and lacks standing

No IAC for not moving to suppress where there’s no standing

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress that the co-defendant already lost on the merits and for which defendant had no standing. State v. Adkins, 2019 Del. Super. LEXIS 335 (July 16, 2019).* Defense counsel wasn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on No IAC for not moving to suppress where there’s no standing

D.Me.: Byrd doesn’t confer standing in the other car in a caravan

Byrd does not confer standing in a rented car part of a two-car caravan where defendant didn’t rent the other car and wasn’t even in it. United States v. Beauregard, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106904 (D. Me. June 26, 2019). … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.Me.: Byrd doesn’t confer standing in the other car in a caravan

MS: No passenger standing in car despite well-secreted drugs

Defendant argued he had standing in a car because he was more than a mere passenger because of how the drugs were hidden and “because ‘[h]e had access to parts of the car that were not normally accessible to a … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Standing | Comments Off on MS: No passenger standing in car despite well-secreted drugs

MN: Search of rented room in single family dwelling was reasonable under SW; it wasn’t apparent it was rented

In a stipulated evidence suppression hearing, defendant did not preserve the issue he presents for appeal. Going to the merits anyway, defendant claimed that his rented room in what was, for all appearances, a single family dwelling was reasonable. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MN: Search of rented room in single family dwelling was reasonable under SW; it wasn’t apparent it was rented

ME: No standing in co-conspirator’s CSLI even when they were tracked together

Defendant lacked standing to contest the CSLI acquisition of his co-conspirator’s cell phone when the police were looking for both. The same rule applies to his Fourth Amendment claim and his claim under Maine’s Electronic Device Location Information Act. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Border search, Cell site location information, Standing | Comments Off on ME: No standing in co-conspirator’s CSLI even when they were tracked together

PA: ID made as a result of warrantless search suppressed, but that which was seen before may be testified to

An officer’s identification made wholly as a result of a warrantless search renders that identification tainted and inadmissible. If, however, eyewitness identification of a defendant occurred prior to illegal conduct by law enforcement may be admissible, if based on observations … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Standing, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on PA: ID made as a result of warrantless search suppressed, but that which was seen before may be testified to