MD: While protective sweep information made it into SW affidavit, there was PC without it

This search with a warrant was preceded by a protective sweep. Observations made during the sweep made it into the warrant affidavit. Assuming without deciding the sweep was unreasonable, there was sufficient other probable cause for the warrant. Founds v. State, 2026 Md. LEXIS 562 (Sep. 30, 2026).

The warrant was particular. “That place was the apartment behind the ‘rear red door with white trim,’ which, ‘when looking at [the] rear of [the] property,’ was ‘the door to the right.’ …. That specific description was the premises to be searched in the warrant. So, it was not a general warrant for the entire building, but a warrant specifically authorizing the search of the apartment behind that door.” It did not just include searching the door. United States v. Gladden, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 237270 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 16, 2026).*

Defendant doesn’t get to file a motion to suppress out of time. While the indictment changed slightly, not enough to affect that. Also, adding new counsel doesn’t justify it either. United States v. Crosby, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238139 (W.D. Mo. Sep. 24, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Motion to suppress, Particularity, Probable cause, Protective sweep. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.