N.D.Ga.: A Customs forensic search of a cell phone away from the border was still a border search

Defendant’s cell phone was seized at ATL Customs for a border search, and it went elsewhere for a forensic search. That search was still a border search. United States v. Vereen, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238218 (N.D. Ga. Sep. 1, 2026).*

The affidavit showed nexus and probable cause to his car and house. As to the house: “The affidavit also demonstrated a sufficient nexus between Tooley’s drug trafficking and the Brockton house. Agents’ surveillance of the property and the location data from Tooley’s cell phone supported a reasonable — indeed, strong — inference that Tooley was living at the house. And during their September 10 FaceTime calls before the controlled purchase, Tooley showed CW-1 how he was cooking the cocaine himself and weighed the drugs on a scale.” United States v. Tooley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238230 (D. Mass. Oct. 19, 2026).*

“Here, according to Plaintiff’s allegations, Officer Gill responded to an attempted assault on Plaintiff by pointing her gun at Plaintiff, the victim. … Gill continued to brandish her firearm at Plaintiff even as Crimm continued to stab Plaintiff. Id. Weighing these facts under the Graham factors, this Court finds that Plaintiff states a claim under § 1983 for violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.” Young v. Gill, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238287 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 19, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Border search, Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.