Category Archives: Standing

W.D.Mo.: No co-conspirator standing in GPS cell phone tracking

One co-conspirator has no standing in GPS tracking of his co-conspirator’s cell phone. The officers also had probable cause to search their car based on: knowledge they were cell phone store burglars, a Snapchat video with defendants having numerous cell … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause, Standing, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: No co-conspirator standing in GPS cell phone tracking

NY: Denial of ownership of a key fob found under def at his arrest is abandonment of the car

Defendant could be detained during the search of his house under a warrant. When he got up off the floor, there was a key fob underneath him, and he denied it was his. The officers used the panic button to … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Attenuation, Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on NY: Denial of ownership of a key fob found under def at his arrest is abandonment of the car

CA3: Crashing a fleeing car here wasn’t excessive force

Crashing a fleeing car here wasn’t unreasonable as excessive force. “Here, we agree with the District Court’s determination that no reasonable juror could find that the force used by Officer Biagini was excessive. It is beyond dispute that, in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Standing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA3: Crashing a fleeing car here wasn’t excessive force

ME: 18 yo son could consent to police entry

Defendant’s 18 year old son living in the home was reasonably believed to have authority to consent to an entry. Then the officers went to find defendant. State v. Glenn, 2021 ME 7 (Jan. 28, 2021). In the direct appeal, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on ME: 18 yo son could consent to police entry

MO: Trial court erred in shifting burden on voluntariness of consent to def and considering failure to testify at suppression hearing

The trial court erred in putting the burden of proof on the defendant to rebut the state’s claim of consent. He didn’t testify, but he cross-examined. The trial court also held against him the failure to testify. State v. Crum, … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on MO: Trial court erred in shifting burden on voluntariness of consent to def and considering failure to testify at suppression hearing

CA10: Gun seized during inventory called off could not be kept by police

Defendant’s car was stopped at the driveway he was pulling out of. The car was going to be impounded, but the actual owner came out and said that it was her car. The gun found during the inventory was hers, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on CA10: Gun seized during inventory called off could not be kept by police

CA11: Standing required for 41(g) motion for return of property

The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining equitable jurisdiction under Rule 41(g) for lack of a threshold showing of standing and justiciability. United States v. Stoune, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 1178 (11th Cir. Jan. 15, 2021). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Standing required for 41(g) motion for return of property

N.D.Ohio: Regular borrowing of a vehicle gave def standing when he had it; affidavit “bare bones” so no GFE

Defendant’s regular borrowing of a vehicle gave him standing in the vehicle when he was driving it. “In sum, the affidavit in support of the December 8, 2017 search warrant fails to provide the requisite ‘“nexus between the place to … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Regular borrowing of a vehicle gave def standing when he had it; affidavit “bare bones” so no GFE

FL2 sua sponte raises lack of standing on the record and remands

“The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Ricardo Fernandez’s motion to suppress after the trial court found the affidavit used to obtain the anticipatory search warrant was deficient and the good faith exception to the warrant requirement did not … Continue reading →

Posted in Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on FL2 sua sponte raises lack of standing on the record and remands

NY3: Visitor at a party had no REP

Defendant was invited to a party at a vacant building loaned to a friend for purposes of the party. He wasn’t staying past the end of the party. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched. People … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on NY3: Visitor at a party had no REP

W.D.Tenn.: Merely being in a friend’s house in one’s underwear during an early morning search isn’t standing

A nonresident defendant found in his underwear at the scene of house search didn’t show guest standing. That alone wasn’t enough. Probably if he brought a toothbrush. United States v. Davenport, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 242449 (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 28, … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Merely being in a friend’s house in one’s underwear during an early morning search isn’t standing

E.D.Ky.: Standing established by def’s own recorded jail call

A jail call showed defendant’s standing that he lived in the house where the search occurred. The entry to arrest him on an arrest warrant led to a valid plain view. United States v. Essex, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238989 … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Standing established by def’s own recorded jail call

CA10: There was no violation of curtilage for def’s home on grounds of 24/7 storage company

Defendant lived on the grounds of a 24/7 storage building company. At 2:30 am, officers investigating saw cars coming and going from the residence. They approached his building, and the approach way wasn’t curtilage under Dunn. United States v. Powell, … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA10: There was no violation of curtilage for def’s home on grounds of 24/7 storage company

ID: Def ordered from home in DV case had no standing in the home when violating order

Defendant ordered to stay away from his own marital home as a result of domestic violence no contact order had no standing in the house when he retreated inside to avoid the officer there to check on his violation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Standing | Comments Off on ID: Def ordered from home in DV case had no standing in the home when violating order

W.D.Va.: Assumption def had guest standing undermined at hearing; additional briefing ordered

While it was assumed by everyone that defendant was an overnight guest, the proof at the hearing was wanting that he was. “Here, Morris testified that she had four bedrooms in her house, two upstairs and two downstairs along with … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Assumption def had guest standing undermined at hearing; additional briefing ordered

CA5: Temporary guest on property had no standing on the curtilage

A temporary guest on the property had no standing in the curtilage. Even so, the officer’s merely looking in his vehicle and seeing Sudafed in plain view wasn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. “It is undisputed that Carr had been inside … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Excessive force, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Temporary guest on property had no standing on the curtilage

OH1: Specific BOLO of being involved in shooting justified stop

A specific BOLO for a vehicle alleged to be involved in a shooting led to defendant’s stop with reasonable suspicion. Probable cause then developed. State v. Houston, 2020-Ohio-5421, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4301 (1st Dist. Nov. 25, 2020). “In his … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on OH1: Specific BOLO of being involved in shooting justified stop

W.D.Wis.: Beware trying to impose Riley on a mere civil discovery request

“Equating a suspected drug trafficker’s assertion of a Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in his cell phone with plaintiffs’ discovery requests in this case wastes everybody’s time.” Driftless Area Land Conservatory v. Huebsch, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218934 (W.D. Wis. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Beware trying to impose Riley on a mere civil discovery request

E.D.Cal.: Def’s “‘bald assertion that he was an overnight guest,’ and nothing more, is certainly insufficient to establish that he had a legitimate” REP

Defendant was in a motel room coming out of the shower when the police came in. His own assertion he was an overnight guest for the previous two nights alone was insufficient to show his standing. United States v. McDaniels, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Def’s “‘bald assertion that he was an overnight guest,’ and nothing more, is certainly insufficient to establish that he had a legitimate” REP

TX7: Def had no standing to challenge the seizure of an aborted fetus’s DNA

Defendant had no standing to challenge the seizure of an aborted fetus’s DNA that connected him to the pregnancy. Sharp v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 9025 (Tex. App. – Amarillo Nov. 17, 2020). Officers had an arrest warrant for … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on TX7: Def had no standing to challenge the seizure of an aborted fetus’s DNA