OH1: Specific BOLO of being involved in shooting justified stop

A specific BOLO for a vehicle alleged to be involved in a shooting led to defendant’s stop with reasonable suspicion. Probable cause then developed. State v. Houston, 2020-Ohio-5421, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4301 (1st Dist. Nov. 25, 2020).

“In his seventh claim, Garner alleged that counsel failed to investigate the allegedly illegal search of his email. The district court similarly rejected this claim for lack of prejudice, because the government’s search was performed pursuant to a search warrant. Id. at 7. No reasonable jurist could debate that decision.” Garner v. United States, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 37295 (6th Cir. Nov. 25, 2020).*

Plaintiff’s complaint that police violated another’s rights by demanding identification doesn’t state a claim for lack of standing. Reardon v. Brown, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 37316 (6th Cir. Nov. 25, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Collective knowledge, Ineffective assistance, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.