Category Archives: Standing

CA8: 38 seconds of additional questions of passenger while ticket being written didn’t unreasonably extend stop

The second officer on the scene did not materially extend the stop by 38 seconds of additional questioning of the passenger while the first officer was writing a ticket. United States v. Salkil, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 25511 (8th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: 38 seconds of additional questions of passenger while ticket being written didn’t unreasonably extend stop

ID: Def has burden of proving standing and can’t rely on state seeking to prove he didn’t have standing

Defendant had the burden of showing standing, and he couldn’t rely on the state not proving he didn’t have standing. Wilson v. State, 2021 Ind. App. LEXIS 264 (Aug. 24, 2021). Finding that defendant was on federal supervised release was … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on ID: Def has burden of proving standing and can’t rely on state seeking to prove he didn’t have standing

N.D.Ohio: Smell of MJ on def’s person not PC to search his car

The officer had no suspicions of defendant before drawing his gun on him. The smell of marijuana on defendant’s person, but not his car, was not probable cause for a search of the car. The officer testified he was quite … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Smell of MJ on def’s person not PC to search his car

N.D.Ga.: Cell phone lock screen is in plain view

On a cell phone, “information that simply appears on a lock screen, without requiring digital entry, is in plain view.” United States v. Blair, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156445 (N.D.Ga. Aug. 18, 2021). Defendant didn’t have a reasonable expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Cell phone lock screen is in plain view

ND: Search of passenger’s person for smell of MJ in car was unreasonable

Defendant’s patdown as a passenger on smell of marijuana was reasonable during the stop, but a search of his person was not. There was no justification for a search of his person. State v. K.V. (In the Interest of K.V.), … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on ND: Search of passenger’s person for smell of MJ in car was unreasonable

CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

Moving a suspicious looking box from the FedEx conveyor belt to a back room for a dog sniff did not require reasonable suspicion nor did it deprive FedEx of custody of the box. The dog alert provided justification for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

CO: Consent to officer’s entry extended to her briefly leaving and reentering

Defendant’s consent for an officer to enter extended to her reentry after leaving to retrieve a camera and then returning (even before getting it). People v. Stone, 2021 COA 104, 2021 Colo. App. LEXIS 1089 (Aug. 5, 2021). Even though … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CO: Consent to officer’s entry extended to her briefly leaving and reentering

N.D.Ill.: Corroborated anonymous 911 call about street corner drug dealing was RS

An anonymous 911 call about drug dealing at a Chicago intersection corroborated by officers’ observations was reasonable suspicion under Navarette. The caller also said she’d be calling back and 911 captured the number. There was little risk the caller couldn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Corroborated anonymous 911 call about street corner drug dealing was RS

N.D.Ohio: Ptf shows Franks violation for leaving out important mitigating information; officer also had apparent motive

Defendant satisfied his Franks burden of showing a material false statement in support of the probable cause showing for the warrant. That information undermined the probable cause. As to the good faith exception, this is what the exclusionary rule is … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Ptf shows Franks violation for leaving out important mitigating information; officer also had apparent motive

M.D.Ala.: That PC is debatable isn’t a lack of PC

There was a substantial basis for the state judge to issue this search warrant. A USMJ came to a different conclusion. That it is debatable doesn’t show a lack of probable cause. United States v. Mitchell, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: That PC is debatable isn’t a lack of PC

W.D.Mo.: How long is too long a wait for search of a seized cell phone: reasonableness controls

“A seizure reasonable at its inception because it is based upon probable cause may become unreasonable as a result of its duration. The duration of the seizure pending the issuance of a search warrant must still be reasonable, and reasonableness … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: How long is too long a wait for search of a seized cell phone: reasonableness controls

N.D.Iowa: Asking “What’s going on?” was not withdrawal of consent

The court adopts the R&R finding on the totality that defendant consented to a search of his backpack, despite some intoxication. His saying “What’s going on?” was not withdrawal of consent. United States v. Harden, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126242 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Foreign searches, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Asking “What’s going on?” was not withdrawal of consent

D.D.C.: Hot pursuit of man with gun into apt was reasonable; and it wasn’t his apt

Defendant didn’t have standing to contest a warrantless entry into his close friend’s apartment when he was hiding there from the police after having fled an apparent arrest. They were also in hot pursuit of a man with a gun. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Hot pursuit, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Hot pursuit of man with gun into apt was reasonable; and it wasn’t his apt

CA1: Direct evidence and indirect inferences showed PC

“Lindsey argues that there was no probable cause to believe there was evidence of drug dealing on the cellphones because the affidavit offered ‘no direct evidence’ that the phones would contain evidence of any drug dealing and the ‘indirect’ evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA1: Direct evidence and indirect inferences showed PC

D.D.C.: One has to assert standing to challenge a Facebook warrant

The target does not assert standing to challenge the search warrant for this Facebook account, which he must. In re Information Associated with One Account Stored at Premises Controlled by Facebook, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120036 (D.D.C. June 4, 2021). … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on D.D.C.: One has to assert standing to challenge a Facebook warrant

W.D.N.Y.: One has to show standing to get access to SW materials

Defendant has to show his standing to get access to the search warrant application under United States v. Pirk, 282 F. Supp. 3d 585, 594 (W.D.N.Y. 2017). United States v. Cobb, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114405 (W.D. N.Y. June 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: One has to show standing to get access to SW materials

Army: Consent to search was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority

Defendant’s consent to search his apartment was obtained after telling him that it was based on the death of his roommate in the parking lot. He was in “custody,” and this was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority. “In … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on Army: Consent to search was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority

WV: Exclusionary rule would not be applied in administrative child abuse proceeding for protection of children

The exclusionary rule does not apply to child abuse allegations in administrative proceedings. The court declines the request to apply it despite the rule that it doesn’t apply in civil cases generally because of harm to the children. In re … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on WV: Exclusionary rule would not be applied in administrative child abuse proceeding for protection of children

N.D.Ohio: DMV’s computer mistake def’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans

DMV’s computer mistake defendant’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans. United States v. Salazar, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103027 (N.D. Ohio June 2, 2021). Defendant’s “regenerating” activity in selling heroin made the warrant application not stale. … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Exclusionary rule, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: DMV’s computer mistake def’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans

CA9: Defendant had standing in his hotel room despite having no REP in a stolen laptop in the room

Defendant had standing to challenge the search of his hotel room, but he did not have any reasonable expectation of privacy in a stolen laptop he possessed. If the entry into the hotel room is unreasonable, the seizure of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Standards of review, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: Defendant had standing in his hotel room despite having no REP in a stolen laptop in the room