Category Archives: Consent

S.D.Tex.: Border Patrol agents failed to show consent to a backscatter x-ray was given at secondary inspection

Defendant consented to a drug dog sniff at the secondary inspection area, but Border Patrol agents failed to show consent to a backscatter x-ray was given. United States v. Hernandez, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15687 (S.D.Tex. February 10, 2015): Defendants … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Consent | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Border Patrol agents failed to show consent to a backscatter x-ray was given at secondary inspection

CO statute on advice of right to refuse consent applied under totality standard

Under Colorado’s statute requiring consent searches be preceded by a warning of a right to refuse consent, this consent was valid on the totality of circumstances. He was warned of the right to refuse orally and in writing in English … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on CO statute on advice of right to refuse consent applied under totality standard

W.D.N.Y.: Declining to go as far as the S.D.N.Y., court orders hearing on whether def knew of AOL’s TOS that it reports child porn

AOL’s TOS is a waiver of a reasonable expectation of privacy in images transmitted through AOL. They have the right to look at them and report suspected child pornography to NCMEC. United States v. Heleniak, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15354 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, E-mail | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Declining to go as far as the S.D.N.Y., court orders hearing on whether def knew of AOL’s TOS that it reports child porn

DC: 2009 consent was attenuated from 2007 search

2009 consent was attenuated from 2007 search. Dawkins v. United States, 12-CO-1648, 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS __ (February 5, 2015), prior appeal 41 A.3d 1265, 1272-73 (D.C. 2012). Considering in detail all the evidence in the case, the court finds … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Attenuation, Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on DC: 2009 consent was attenuated from 2007 search

D.Nev.: FBI internet ruse against USAO advice leads to suppression of entry by deception

The Hill: Court tosses warrant after FBI’s Internet ‘ruse’ by Cory Bennett: A federal magistrate judge is dismissing an FBI search warrant that led to the arrest of as many as eight people accused of running an illegal online sports … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Police misconduct, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Nev.: FBI internet ruse against USAO advice leads to suppression of entry by deception

CA11: Consent to search a flash drive on a computer not exceeded by officer opening most recent document

Defendant consented to the search of a flash drive on his computer to show that he was doing his homework. It was reasonable for the officer to open the most recent document, and that was not an unreasonable search or … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA11: Consent to search a flash drive on a computer not exceeded by officer opening most recent document

NV: Holding a pedestrian’s ID too long became an illegal detention; checking warrants became unreasonable

Holding a pedestrian’s ID too long constitutes an unreasonable seizure. Here, the officer promptly dispelled any reason for the stop, but holding on to the ID extended the stop. Then he sought warrants on the defendant, finding one, and the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NV: Holding a pedestrian’s ID too long became an illegal detention; checking warrants became unreasonable

UT: Remote use of Wyoming Toolkit on computer on Gnutella P2P network not unreasonable search

Defendant consented to the police taking possession of his computer after they contacted him about finding child pornography on it via accessing it by Gnutella P2P networking and examining it remotely with the Wyoming Toolkit. This was a reasonable search … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on UT: Remote use of Wyoming Toolkit on computer on Gnutella P2P network not unreasonable search

OH9: One day delay in getting cell phone SW after exigent based seizure not unreasonable

Police seized defendant’s phone because of suspected child pornography on it. The warrant to search the phone was not issued until the following day. Defendant cites no authority that a one day delay was unreasonable. State v. Welch, 2015-Ohio-284, 2015 … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Cell phones, Consent, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH9: One day delay in getting cell phone SW after exigent based seizure not unreasonable

S.D.N.Y.: Screen chat service that passed information to NCMEC was still a private actor

Screen chat service that passed information to NCMEC was still a private actor. United States v. Ditomasso, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9645 (S.D.N.Y. January 26, 2015): On October 28, 2014, I ruled that DiTomasso had a reasonable expectation of privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Screen chat service that passed information to NCMEC was still a private actor

CA7: Ptfs adequately pled that officers searched house without consent from 14 year old

At the pleading stage, plaintiffs adequately pled that officers told a 14 girl that they had to search the house, she ran upstairs with her brother, and the officers did so without a warrant. There is no consent on the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA7: Ptfs adequately pled that officers searched house without consent from 14 year old

CA5: Unsolicited consent to search cell phone dissipated taint of unlawful detention

Even assuming, without deciding, a constitutional violation in the length of defendant’s detention, his unsolicited offer to have the police search his cell phone dissipated any taint and attenuated the cell phone search from the detention. United States v. Montgomery, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Cell phones, Consent | Comments Off on CA5: Unsolicited consent to search cell phone dissipated taint of unlawful detention

N.D.Iowa: Fourth Amendment doesn’t require that driver be given option to call somebody to get car

This inventory was shown to be valid despite the argument that defendant’s wife could have been called to get the car. No Fourth Amendment case says that’s a requirement. United States v. Crane, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8448 (N.D. Iowa … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Inventory | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Fourth Amendment doesn’t require that driver be given option to call somebody to get car

N.D.Cal.: Def’s admission he lived in place he was found justified parole search of place

All things considered, defendant consented to a search of the house. The fact the consent form was signed after the entry is of minimal value and couldn’t cure an illegal entry anyway. The search is also justified as a parole … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Def’s admission he lived in place he was found justified parole search of place

E.D.Tenn.: Using def’s cell phone to call 911 to obtain its number did not violate Riley

The use of defendant’s cell phone to call 911 to obtain its number did not violate Riley, and, even so, was within the good faith exception. United States v. Caldwell, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4279 (E.D. Tenn. January 14, 2015), … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Using def’s cell phone to call 911 to obtain its number did not violate Riley

Capital (NYS): Torres says ‘Right to Know’ proposal misunderstood

Capital (NYS): Torres says ‘Right to Know’ proposal misunderstood by Gloria Pazmino: Councilman Ritchie Torres said Friday there is a “campaign” to misrepresent the purpose of his policing bill, called the Right to Know Act, which would require officers to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on Capital (NYS): Torres says ‘Right to Know’ proposal misunderstood

CA6: Def deferred consent to his mother, and her’s was voluntary

Defendant deferred the question to consent to search his place to his mother with whom he lived. She validly and promptly consented to the officers’ request, and it was all voluntary. United States v. Gossett, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 417, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Def deferred consent to his mother, and her’s was voluntary

MA: Impoundment was appropriate for a vehicle that would have to be left in a high-crime area

The impoundment of this vehicle and inventory of the contents was proper under the circumstances. It was found with the engine running in a high crime area, and it was subject to vandalism or theft if left, all aside from … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on MA: Impoundment was appropriate for a vehicle that would have to be left in a high-crime area

E.D.Cal.: Non-residents can’t complain of a dog sniff in the yard of a grow operation at a house

Codefendants who did not live at the premises had no standing to contest the presence of a drug dog in the front yard to sniff. Codefendants’ brief presence at a grow operation, with other things, was still probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Dog sniff, Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Non-residents can’t complain of a dog sniff in the yard of a grow operation at a house

D.Nev.: Defendant did not abandon his car by running from it when he saw the police; the search of the car lacked any legal basis

Defendant parked his car in a residential area, saw the police, and ran. When they caught him, he laid prone on the ground and was patted down, finding no weapons. The following search of his pockets was without probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Defendant did not abandon his car by running from it when he saw the police; the search of the car lacked any legal basis