Author Archives: Hall

D.Conn.: Federal court won’t order return of phone still subject to state court case

In a motion for return of property, a state search warrant was issued for defendant’s phone and the warrant authorized a federal forensic examination of the phone. The need for the phone is over in federal court, but not state … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Federal court won’t order return of phone still subject to state court case

E.D.Ark.: Non-parolee was subject to search with parolee in hotel room with RS drugs were being sold

Defendant was in the hotel room of another who was on parole and there was at least reasonable suspicion to believe was dealing drugs from the room. Search of the room was valid as to the defendant guest. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Non-parolee was subject to search with parolee in hotel room with RS drugs were being sold

D.Me.: Probationers have greater incentive to dispose of criminal evidence

“Balanced against this diminished expectation of privacy is the government’s heightened interest in evaluating and monitoring the conduct of persons on supervised release. Id. The United States Office of Probation and Pretrial Services has a legitimate, important interest in ‘rehabilitation … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Me.: Probationers have greater incentive to dispose of criminal evidence

U.S. House Hearing April 8th: A Continued Pattern of Government Surveillance of U.S. Citizens

U.S. House Hearing April 8th: A Continued Pattern of Government Surveillance of U.S. Citizens:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on U.S. House Hearing April 8th: A Continued Pattern of Government Surveillance of U.S. Citizens

S.D.N.Y.: Metro-North RR worker stated claim for 4A violation in personal searches

Plaintiff worked for Metro-North Railroad, and he sued claiming he was subject to searches of his person and stuff without justification. He stated a plausible claim under the Fourth Amendment under O’Connor v. Ortega. Foli v. Metro-N. R.R., 2025 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Metro-North RR worker stated claim for 4A violation in personal searches

MI: Smell of MJ from a vehicle no longer PC

In Michigan, because of legalization of recreational marijuana the smell of marijuana from a vehicle is no longer probable cause to search. People v. Armstrong, 2025 Mich. LEXIS 583 (April 2, 2025). From the court’s syllabus:

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on MI: Smell of MJ from a vehicle no longer PC

ME: Search for ammunition permits a search in small spaces

A search for ammunition permits a search in small spaces. State v. Thomas, 2025 ME 34 (Apr. 1, 2025). “The trial court erred when it mistakenly applied the Texas Rules of Evidence during the motion to suppress hearing by sustaining … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on ME: Search for ammunition permits a search in small spaces

TX upholds geofence warrant

Wells v. State, 2025 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 210 (Apr. 2, 2025) (6-3) [somehow what we’ve come to expect from Texas]:

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on TX upholds geofence warrant

CA9: Arrest of def’s drug runners was exigency for entry into his hotel room

The arrest of defendant’s drug runners was exigency for entry into his hotel room. United States v. Biggs, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7696 (9th Cir. Apr. 2, 2025). The trial court erred in holding that defendant’s father who owned the … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest of def’s drug runners was exigency for entry into his hotel room

CNS: ACLU urges 2nd Circuit to rethink no-warrant cellphone searches at US border

Courthouse News Service: ACLU urges 2nd Circuit to rethink no-warrant cellphone searches at US border by Erik Uebelacker (“A Fourth Amendment carveout that gives U.S. Border Patrol agents the right to conduct warrantless searches shouldn’t apply to cellphones and laptops, … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CNS: ACLU urges 2nd Circuit to rethink no-warrant cellphone searches at US border

CA3: Def’s being a manager of premises gave RS as to him under PA law

Defendant’s status as the manager of a lounge gave reasonable suspicion to detain him under Pennsylvania law for what was going on inside. United States v. Burgess, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7359 (3d Cir. Mar. 31, 2025). Plaintiff’s civil Franks … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Def’s being a manager of premises gave RS as to him under PA law

OH4: Arrest on recalled warrant still valid under GFE

The warrants database showed a warrant for defendant, but it actually had been recalled. The officer checked dispatch who told him of the warrant, although defendant denied there was one, but he had a motive to lie to avoid arrest. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on OH4: Arrest on recalled warrant still valid under GFE

IL: Mere possession of a firearm not RS of illegal possession

The fact a person “might have a firearm but not a CCL” isn’t reasonable suspicion. Otherwise, all of them are subject to a stop and frisk. People v. Dorsey, 2025 IL App (1st) 240933, 2025 Ill. App. LEXIS 624 (Mar. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Mere possession of a firearm not RS of illegal possession

NJ recognizes right to advice of counsel before request for consent

The right to advice of counsel under the Fifth Amendment has to be read together with the Fourth Amendment and a request for consent. Other states do not, but New Jersey does. Defendant was asked for consent inside his own … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on NJ recognizes right to advice of counsel before request for consent

FDNV: Primer on Persistent Surveillance

Federal Defender of Nevada: Primer on Persistent Surveillance (Mar. 28, 2025):

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on FDNV: Primer on Persistent Surveillance

MD: When asked if def “minded” to consent to a frisk, he consented

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and the officer asked about whether he was armed and whether he “minded” to consent to a frisk. He argued that he had no choice but to answer, but he did have a … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Curtilage, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MD: When asked if def “minded” to consent to a frisk, he consented

SD: Questions about carrying drugs without RS extended the stop in violation of Rodriquez

Questions about drugs during a traffic stop asked without reasonable suspicion extended the stop and made it unreasonable. State v. Holy, 2025 S.D. 19 (Mar. 26, 2025):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on SD: Questions about carrying drugs without RS extended the stop in violation of Rodriquez

IN: State’s reliance on GFE not waived where it didn’t argue it but trial court decided it

“The totality of the evidence before the issuing judge was sufficient to establish probable cause. Detective Salley’s affidavit in support of the search warrant had outlined observations that law enforcement had made during surveillance of the Astro Drive Residence, which, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: State’s reliance on GFE not waived where it didn’t argue it but trial court decided it

WSJ: The Five Things You Shouldn’t Tell ChatGPT

WSJ: The Five Things You Shouldn’t Tell ChatGPT by Nicole Nguyen (“Don’t let your mystery rash become AI training fodder—or turn up in a data breach”) Or a government subpoena or search warrant.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on WSJ: The Five Things You Shouldn’t Tell ChatGPT

D.Kan.: Marion County Record retaliatory newspaper search case

In the Marion County Record case, the now infamous case of a search warrant for a newspaper’s servers and all electronic devices based on a First Amendment retaliation claim, the main Fourth Amendment claim survives the motions to dismiss. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Overseizure | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Marion County Record retaliatory newspaper search case