MD: When asked if def “minded” to consent to a frisk, he consented

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and the officer asked about whether he was armed and whether he “minded” to consent to a frisk. He argued that he had no choice but to answer, but he did have a choice. Drugs and a defaced firearm were found. [The video shows it was all consensual.] State v. Smith, 2025 Md. App. LEXIS 248 (Mar. 28, 2025).

No Fourth Amendment violation from the officer entering plaintiff’s short driveway to get his license number of his car. Martin v. Adams, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58249 (M.D. Ga. Mar. 28, 2025).*

Defendant was not seized when he met with officers and voluntarily turned over his car keys. Guam v. Mwarepue, 2025 Guam Trial Order LEXIS 53 (Feb. 4, 2025).*

Plaintiff’s claim for lost property as a result of a state search that federal officers were involved in is a new Bivens claim and denied. Agro Dynamics, LLC v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2025).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Curtilage, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.