Author Archives: Hall

CA10: Ptf has burden on “clearly established law” and failed

The plaintiff in a § 1983 case has the burden on clearly established law, and here the showing completely failed. “Anemic.” Bailey v. Beale, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 14449 (10th Cir. June 12, 2025).* “[T]he individual officers did not violate … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf has burden on “clearly established law” and failed

E.D.Okla.: Entry to look for shooting victim was reasonable

Officer’s entry to look for a potential shooting victim was reasonable on exigent circumstances. United States v. Bird, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112088 (E.D. Okla. May 7, 2025).* Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging defendant’s taking DNA by warrant. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Entry to look for shooting victim was reasonable

TX3: Ordered destruction of LivePD raw video didn’t justify dismissing obstruction indictment of sheriff and ADA

Destruction of A&E LivePD raw video didn’t justify dismissing defendants’ indictment. Defendants were an ADA and the sheriff. State v. Nassour, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 4047 (Tex. App. – Austin June 13, 2025):

Posted in Discovery | Comments Off on TX3: Ordered destruction of LivePD raw video didn’t justify dismissing obstruction indictment of sheriff and ADA

SCOTUS: FTCA applies to raid of the wrong house, remanded to CA11

After federal law enforcement officers raided the wrong house, which should have been evident at the time, the occupants stay in court on their FTCA claim and get to litigate the negligence claim. Martin v. United States, 2025 U.S. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS, Warrant execution | Comments Off on SCOTUS: FTCA applies to raid of the wrong house, remanded to CA11

CA2: Def’s GF using passcode to open his phone in presence of police wasn’t a governmental search

In a child pornography case, defendant’s girlfriend was not acting as an agent of the police when she used his passcode to open his phone in the presence of an officer. United States v. Hines, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 14336 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Private search | Comments Off on CA2: Def’s GF using passcode to open his phone in presence of police wasn’t a governmental search

WaPo: New Orleans pushes to legalize police use of ‘facial surveillance’

WaPo: New Orleans pushes to legalize police use of ‘facial surveillance’ by Douglas MacMillan(“New Orleans is considering easing restrictions on the police use of facial recognition, weeks after The Washington Post reported that police there secretly relied on a network … Continue reading →

Posted in Facial recognition | Comments Off on WaPo: New Orleans pushes to legalize police use of ‘facial surveillance’

N.D.Ind.: Pro se def’s post-trial motion to dismiss for 4A issue he didn’t fully appreciate timely is denied

Pro se defendant can’t raise a post-trial Fourth Amendment claim because he didn’t fully understand the FBI 302 discussing the search. “What Defendant is experiencing are the real-world consequences that he was warned of when he elected to proceed pro … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Pro se def’s post-trial motion to dismiss for 4A issue he didn’t fully appreciate timely is denied

CA11: “[T]he presence of contradictory evidence does not bar a finding of probable cause”; It must refute it

“[T]he presence of contradictory evidence does not bar a finding of probable cause.” It must refute it. Scott v. City of Miami, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 14381 (11th Cir. June 11, 2025):

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA11: “[T]he presence of contradictory evidence does not bar a finding of probable cause”; It must refute it

D.Mont.: Civil demand for BAC test in Indian country did not violate HIPAA

The FBI’s civil demand from the BIA for BAC records from a hospital did not violate HIPAA. United States v. Cree Medicine, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110982 (D. Mont. June 11, 2025):

Posted in Privileges, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Civil demand for BAC test in Indian country did not violate HIPAA

ABA: Stop and Frisk: Appropriate or Unconstitutional?

ABA: Stop and Frisk: Appropriate or Unconstitutional? by Oran Lott Bullock & Yolanda Means (“Stop and frisk is both a symbol of proactive policing and a flashpoint for civil liberties advocates. Central to the debate is the threshold of ‘reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on ABA: Stop and Frisk: Appropriate or Unconstitutional?

E.D.Ky.: Only “some temporal reference” is required to avoid staleness

The affidavit for search warrant shows sufficient references to recent time to show it was not stale. “Put plainly, the Sixth Circuit does not require a search warrant affidavit to include the temporal specificity which Hardaway suggests is necessary. Rather, … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Only “some temporal reference” is required to avoid staleness

N.D.Ohio: ALPR does not equate with CSLI

The use of Automatic License Plate Readers to track movements of defendant’s car can’t (yet) equate with Carpenter’s CSLI. Maybe someday, but not here. There are many differences on this record. United States v. Sturdivant, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109054 … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: ALPR does not equate with CSLI

D.Colo.: This collection of unsubstantiated information wasn’t RS

Defendant’s search incident of his car for proof of insurance was without probable cause. As for reasonable suspicion, his change in demeanor once he found out a search of the car was going to occur didn’t contribute to reasonable suspicion. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Colo.: This collection of unsubstantiated information wasn’t RS

GA: SW affidavit came in at trial; argument waived

Defendant’s argument about admission of a search warrant affidavit at trial was deemed abandoned even for plain error review. Coston v. State, 2025 Ga. LEXIS 123 (June 10, 2025).* (Caution readers: I had this issue just this year: The prosecution … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: SW affidavit came in at trial; argument waived

Arnold & Porter: People Are Not Documents: Texas Court Rules That Administrative Inspection Warrants Cannot Be Used for Immigration Raids of Businesses

Arnold & Porter: People Are Not Documents: Texas Court Rules That Administrative Inspection Warrants Cannot Be Used for Immigration Raids of Businesses by Mohamed Al-Hendy, Lee M. Cortes, Jr., Ryan Hartman & Murad Hussain:

Posted in Administrative search, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on Arnold & Porter: People Are Not Documents: Texas Court Rules That Administrative Inspection Warrants Cannot Be Used for Immigration Raids of Businesses

OR: State didn’t develop alternative search theory just by mentioning it

The state didn’t sufficiently develop search incident as an alternative theory to sustain the search merely by mentioning it. State v. Ribota, 341 Or. App. 32 (June 4, 2025). There is a fact question for trial for excessive force, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on OR: State didn’t develop alternative search theory just by mentioning it

Reason: Denver Case Highlights the Potentially Deadly Hazards of Police Raids Based on Secondhand Information

Reason: Denver Case Highlights the Potentially Deadly Hazards of Police Raids Based on Secondhand Information by Jacob Sullum (“Michael Mendenhall wants the Supreme Court to reconsider a precedent that allows home invasions based on nothing but hearsay.”). Cert. petitions almost … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Reason: Denver Case Highlights the Potentially Deadly Hazards of Police Raids Based on Secondhand Information

Marshall Project: How AI-Powered Police Forces Watch Your Every Move

Marshall Project: How AI-Powered Police Forces Watch Your Every Move by Jamiles Lartley (“Artificial intelligence is changing how police investigate crimes — and monitor citizens — as regulators struggle to keep pace.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology, Video surveillance | Comments Off on Marshall Project: How AI-Powered Police Forces Watch Your Every Move

TechPolicy.press: A Model Framework for Regulating Geofence Warrants

TechPolicy.press: A Model Framework for Regulating Geofence Warrants by Vivek Krishnamurthy:

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on TechPolicy.press: A Model Framework for Regulating Geofence Warrants

NM: Aguilar-Spinelli are still followed here and they were satisfied

Aguilar-Spinelli is still followed in New Mexico, and its strictures were met here. Motion to suppress properly denied, and court of appeals reversed. State v. Perea, 2025 N.M. LEXIS 91 (June 5, 2025):

Posted in Informant hearsay, State constitution | Comments Off on NM: Aguilar-Spinelli are still followed here and they were satisfied