Author Archives: Hall

Cal.1: Def’s false name was intended to avoid probation search condition; he’s estopped to argue exclusionary rule

“We hold that when a probationer gives a false name to a police officer, and a record check of that name fails to reveal that the probationer is in fact subject to a search condition, the probationer is estopped from … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1: Def’s false name was intended to avoid probation search condition; he’s estopped to argue exclusionary rule

NY3: Call from DEA to stop def was based on their PC

The officers stopping defendant received a call from the DEA to stop him because he was involved with a place they were searching, having just left with a backpack as the DEA was arriving. The stop was based on their … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY3: Call from DEA to stop def was based on their PC

CA7: No 4A right to see SW before search; therefore, accidentally showing wrong warrant doesn’t violate 4A either

The Fourth Amendment does not require the search warrant be presented to the person whose premises were to be searched before it occurred. Thus, accidently presenting the wrong search warrant at the time of the search doesn’t constitutionally matter. Also, … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: No 4A right to see SW before search; therefore, accidentally showing wrong warrant doesn’t violate 4A either

N.D.Ohio: No IAC for not raising search issue that would lose on merits by inevitable discovery

“Nevertheless, Petitioner’s arguments for suppression do not succeed. [¶] This is because police ultimately found the firearm and ammunition from an independent source, thus defeating the need for suppression. Under the independent source doctrine, evidence that was ‘initially discovered during … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: No IAC for not raising search issue that would lose on merits by inevitable discovery

ID: Search of driver while waiting for confirmation of outstanding warrant suppressed; second search after finding it was valid; no inevitable discovery

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and it came back that there might be a warrant for him. Under state practice, the police then seek confirmation of the warrant before acting on it. Here, however, defendant was frisked incident … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Search of driver while waiting for confirmation of outstanding warrant suppressed; second search after finding it was valid; no inevitable discovery

NY2: Def ordered out of backseat of car during speeding stop resulted in admission of gun; suppressed for lack of RS

Defendant was in the backseat of a car stopped in Queens for speeding. The officer decided he was a little too nervous and had him get out and asked him what he had. Defendant said “I have a piece.” Based … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY2: Def ordered out of backseat of car during speeding stop resulted in admission of gun; suppressed for lack of RS

N.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW didn’t support def’s claim of standing

Defendant relied on the affidavit for search warrant as showing his standing, but it didn’t resolve the question, so he fails in his burden of proof and lacks standing. The government showed nexus in the 61 page affidavit for residences … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Nexus, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW didn’t support def’s claim of standing

CA10: GFE applied to cell phone SW in KS where phone was actually searched in MO

Search incident did not justify seizure of defendant’s cell phone when he was arrested because he’d been separated from the cell phone. The government’s claim that officers seizing the cell phone were proceeding under “direction of” defendant’s PO is rejected … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Search incident, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: GFE applied to cell phone SW in KS where phone was actually searched in MO

CA3: SW issued after alleged illegal entry was based on independent source and valid

“[W]hen police search a home pursuant to a warrant obtained after a warrantless search, evidence obtained pursuant to the warrant need not be suppressed so long as: (1) a neutral magistrate would still have issued the warrant ‘even if not … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: SW issued after alleged illegal entry was based on independent source and valid

Gizmodo: Georgetown Lawyers Sue NYPD to Reveal Its Secret Face Recognition Programs

Gizmodo: Georgetown Lawyers Sue NYPD to Reveal Its Secret Face Recognition Programs by Sidney Fussell: Researchers at the Georgetown Center of Privacy and Technology have filed suit against the NYPD for more details on the department’s highly secretive face recognition … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Gizmodo: Georgetown Lawyers Sue NYPD to Reveal Its Secret Face Recognition Programs

NPR: A Homeless Man’s Truck Is His Home, Judge Rules In Seattle

NPR: A Homeless Man’s Truck Is His Home, Judge Rules In Seattle by Laurel Wamsley: In a case that may have significant implications for Seattle’s fast-growing homeless population, a King County Superior Court judge ruled on Friday that the pickup … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NPR: A Homeless Man’s Truck Is His Home, Judge Rules In Seattle

CA10: Three CIs corroborated each other and were independently corroborated

The affidavit for the arrest warrant was based on three CIs who corroborated each other and which were independently corroborated by the police. A Franks challenge was included that a prior search resulted in finding drugs that were not mentioned … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA10: Three CIs corroborated each other and were independently corroborated

Army: Specific issue of using computer to aid iPhone search waived by not presenting to trial court

On appeal defendant conceded the lawfulness of the seizure of his iPhone. Army investigators allegedly illegally seized a computer as well. All the trial court litigation never raised the question of the use of the computer, too, so that’s waived. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Cell phones, Consent | Comments Off on Army: Specific issue of using computer to aid iPhone search waived by not presenting to trial court

MD: Use of text messaging is not a waiver of REP for spousal privilege

The state obtained text messages by legal process and admitted them at trial, arguing that the Verizon service agreement was a waiver of any reasonable expectation of privacy in third party records. It is not a waiver of spousal privilege … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, E-mail, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MD: Use of text messaging is not a waiver of REP for spousal privilege

LR article: Manuel v. City of Joliet: Pursuing a Claim Under the Fourth Amendment

Manuel v. City of Joliet: Pursuing a Claim Under the Fourth Amendment by Lynda Hercules Charleson, 5 Tex. A&M L. Rev. Arguendo 47 (2017). Abstract:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on LR article: Manuel v. City of Joliet: Pursuing a Claim Under the Fourth Amendment

OH8: No standing in a package neither sent nor to be received by def

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the placing of the GPS tracking device on the package because she was neither the sender nor addressee of the package and demonstrated no reasonable expectation of privacy in the package. The police could validly … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, GPS / Tracking Data, Standing | Comments Off on OH8: No standing in a package neither sent nor to be received by def

The Intercept: New Orleans Surveillance Program Gives Powerful Tools to a Police Department with a History of Racism and Abuse

The Intercept: New Orleans Surveillance Program Gives Powerful Tools to a Police Department with a History of Racism and Abuse by Michael Isaac Stein:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Intercept: New Orleans Surveillance Program Gives Powerful Tools to a Police Department with a History of Racism and Abuse

Gizmodo: FBI’s Use of Paid Best Buy Informants Goes Deeper Than We Knew

Gizmodo: FBI’s Use of Paid Best Buy Informants Goes Deeper Than We Knew by Dell Cameron:

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on Gizmodo: FBI’s Use of Paid Best Buy Informants Goes Deeper Than We Knew

The Crime Report: Does Police Immunity for Wrongful Arrests Really Deter Crime?

The Crime Report: Does Police Immunity for Wrongful Arrests Really Deter Crime? In the wake of ongoing attention to police misconduct, a new economic study considers the cost of granting full immunity to officers for wrongful arrests and detention of … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on The Crime Report: Does Police Immunity for Wrongful Arrests Really Deter Crime?

AK: SW clause to “search any persons” here didn’t enable search of every person who came to the premises during the search

Defendant came to a Fairbanks house when a search warrant was being executed, and he was searched, too, under the auspices of the “search any persons” present reference in the warrant. Defendant’s search was unreasonable under the circumstances. Innocent persons … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AK: SW clause to “search any persons” here didn’t enable search of every person who came to the premises during the search