Author Archives: Hall

KY: License plate reader alert justified stop

A license plate reader told the officer that defendant’s car insurance needed to be verified because it was not on file, and that was a reasonable basis for the stop. Lynem v. Commonwealth, 2018 Ky. App. LEXIS 299 (Dec. 7, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY: License plate reader alert justified stop

KS: Smell of MJ at def’s door was PC it was inside; protective sweep valid

The smell of marijuana at defendant’s door was probable cause there was marijuana inside, and that justified a protective sweep to secure the premises pending getting a warrant. State v. Hubbard, 2018 Kan. LEXIS 592 (Dec. 7, 2018):

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on KS: Smell of MJ at def’s door was PC it was inside; protective sweep valid

D.Ore.: Where the detention was with RS, the fact it took an hour to get a free drug dog there wasn’t unreasonable

The officer had reasonable suspicion for detention for the dog sniff. Then it took an hour to get a drug dog there because the police were busy that night. It was not unreasonable on the totality. United States v. Krumwiede, … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Ore.: Where the detention was with RS, the fact it took an hour to get a free drug dog there wasn’t unreasonable

OH6: Not having a full suppression hearing and limiting issues was sound strategy

Defense counsel’s strategy was to attack probable cause, and a full suppression hearing was to be avoided, because that would surely lose. That was sound strategy at the time. State v. Nettles, 2018-Ohio-4908, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 5237 (6th Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH6: Not having a full suppression hearing and limiting issues was sound strategy

DE: No REP in shared Facebook photos

“Moreover, Harris’ contention that his public Facebook photos were ‘illegally seized’ has no merit.” There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a shared social media post. Harris v. State, 2018 Del. LEXIS 540 (Dec. 3, 2018). Defendant argued that … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on DE: No REP in shared Facebook photos

S.D.N.Y.: In a document search, a slight overseizure that the govt declines to use avoids extraordinary remedy of suppression

“In sum, the affidavits set forth detailed information concerning the evidence of insider trading obtained and the connection between the devices and accounts concerned and probable additional evidence. The warrants were particularized and their breadth tied to the evidence relevant … Continue reading →

Posted in Overseizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: In a document search, a slight overseizure that the govt declines to use avoids extraordinary remedy of suppression

S.D.N.Y.: Failure to challenge CSLI before Carpenter wasn’t IAC

Defendant’s verdict was the day Carpenter was decided, and his defense lawyer hadn’t challenged the CSLI before that. Defense lawyers don’t have to forecast changes in the law. “ Even following Carpenter, the Second Circuit has declined to suppress cell … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Failure to challenge CSLI before Carpenter wasn’t IAC

S.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep of small apt loft was valid

A protective sweep of even a small apartment’s loft and closet is valid. Plain view sustained. United States v. Green, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206238 (S.D. N.Y. Dec. 6, 2018).* The search issue is not dispositive of the case because … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Protective sweep | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep of small apt loft was valid

E.D.Tenn.: CI on the controlled buy wasn’t an “active participant” in the crime

The CI’s participation in the controlled buy that led to a search warrant doesn’t make the CI an “active participant” in the crime where that’s only the basis for issuance of the warrant and it’s not a separate charge. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: CI on the controlled buy wasn’t an “active participant” in the crime

D.D.C.: Def’s 4A IAC claim fails because he can’t show he’d prevail on merits of search

Defendant can’t show that his Fourth Amendment claim would have succeeded on the seizure of evidence from a car for IAC purposes. “Here, Miller, having focused almost exclusively on standing to the exclusion of the remainder of his burden, cannot … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Def’s 4A IAC claim fails because he can’t show he’d prevail on merits of search

LA: False statement in affidavit passed from another officer was harmless on PC question

The statement the officer used in the affidavit came from another officer. At worst it was negligent and not an intentional misrepresentation. No matter what, however, it doesn’t undermine the probable cause, so the motion was properly denied. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on LA: False statement in affidavit passed from another officer was harmless on PC question

MN: Drunk sleeping man who’d just threatened woman with gun could be frisked for weapon under emergency exception, but not Terry

Defendant was drunk in a house allegedly threatening a woman and her infant child with a gun. He passed out. She called the police. The police entered, and defendant was asleep on the couch. They patted him down for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MN: Drunk sleeping man who’d just threatened woman with gun could be frisked for weapon under emergency exception, but not Terry

N.D.Ga.: Bank robbery suspect who fled car after PIT maneuver stopped it abandoned it

“After looking at the collective knowledge of law enforcement at the time of the arrest—which includes four eyewitness identifications, one voice identification, and a tip from the defendant’s own girlfriend turning him in for the People’s Bank robbery—the court finds … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Bank robbery suspect who fled car after PIT maneuver stopped it abandoned it

NY1: Tossing backpack from car is waiver of REP

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a backpack he tossed from a car as he was being stopped by the police. (This conviction was February 2013; nearly six years being decided on appeal.) People v. Febo, 2018 N.Y. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on NY1: Tossing backpack from car is waiver of REP

OH5: Suppression motion cannot be denied solely for def’s nonappearance at hearing

Defendant failed to appear for his suppression hearing, and the trial court denied the motion based on that. He has a constitutional right to be present, and the court could not deny the motion solely on that ground. Reversed. If … Continue reading →

Posted in Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH5: Suppression motion cannot be denied solely for def’s nonappearance at hearing

S.D.Ga.: No standing in a wiretapped contraband cell phone in prison

Defendant’s calls on a contraband cell phone in jail were wiretapped. He doesn’t even have standing because the phone was unlawful. “The cases concerning the precise question at issue—a prisoner’s ability to challenge the introduction of intercepted communications from his … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: No standing in a wiretapped contraband cell phone in prison

CA9: Court can’t order return of property govt doesn’t have

Defendant can’t get an order for return of property where he can’t show that the government even has it. United States v. Tziu-Uc, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 34105 (9th Cir. Dec. 4, 2018). Self-represented defendant claimed ineffective assistance of counsel … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Court can’t order return of property govt doesn’t have

S.D.N.Y.: No standing in an email account def didn’t open and disavows

Defendant has no standing in an email account that was opened by somebody else that he disavows is even connected to him. United States v. Lewis, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202501 (S.D. N.Y. Nov. 29, 2018). Reconsideration of prior denial … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No standing in an email account def didn’t open and disavows

D.Mont.: Probation search of place probationer was merely visiting unreasonable

A person on supervised release was subject to a search condition of his residence. That did not include places he was visiting. Search of his backpack suppressed; a search warrant was required to even enter the premises of a third … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Probation search of place probationer was merely visiting unreasonable

W.D.Mo.: Boilerplate Franks claim fails on its face

“The defendant’s boilerplate claim that the ‘information used to obtain the search warrant from the Circuit Court judge was flawed with false allegation….’, … does not meet the Franks test for a hearing.” “While defendant did not explicitly argue that … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Boilerplate Franks claim fails on its face