Author Archives: Hall

Slate: “Creepiness” Is the Wrong Way to Think About Privacy

Slate: “Creepiness” Is the Wrong Way to Think About Privacy by Neil Richards:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Slate: “Creepiness” Is the Wrong Way to Think About Privacy

W.D.Tex.: Case on taking key from a child for police to enter house will go to a jury; no exigency, no QI

Using key obtained from a teenage daughter’s bra, in handcuffs a block away, the mom and two other daughters get to present their case to a jury that police used the key to unreasonably enter the house without announcement. E.R. … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Case on taking key from a child for police to enter house will go to a jury; no exigency, no QI

WA: No REP in text message exchange

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages exchanged with another, even under the state’s more protective constitution of “private affairs.” State v. Pouncy, 2021 Wash. App. LEXIS 2811 (Nov. 30, 2021) (unpublished).* The reasonableness of a traffic … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on WA: No REP in text message exchange

TX5: SW for firearms in a vehicle permitted search and seizure of GSR although not specified

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s car for firearms, but they also searched for gunshot residue which was not particularly described. Still, searching for GSR is reasonable on execution of the warrant. Brown v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on TX5: SW for firearms in a vehicle permitted search and seizure of GSR although not specified

Yale L.J.: “The Ostensible (and, at Times, Actual) Virtue of Deference” to police expertise

Anthony O’Rourke, The Ostensible (and, at Times, Actual) Virtue of Deference, Yale L. Journal (Nov. 30, 2021), at note 36:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Yale L.J.: “The Ostensible (and, at Times, Actual) Virtue of Deference” to police expertise

Buying Data and the Fourth Amendment by Orin S. Kerr

Orin S. Kerr, Buying Data and the Fourth Amendment, Hoover Institution, Aegis Series Paper No. 2109 (Nov. 17, 2021):

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on Buying Data and the Fourth Amendment by Orin S. Kerr

FL1: Alleged statutory violation for seizing alcohol abusers not subject to any exclusionary rule

An officer’s alleged violation of statutory procedures for dealing with alcohol abusers they encounter is not subject to an exclusionary rule. Nothing in the statute even suggests it. Jones v. State, 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS 15097 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on FL1: Alleged statutory violation for seizing alcohol abusers not subject to any exclusionary rule

PA: Sometimes a police-citizen encounter is “a legal fiction” in an “Alice in Wonderland scenario,” like here, but they’re bound by it

The officers’ seeing the outline of a gun on defendant’s person as they drove by justified their turning around and encountering him. Under existing law, “a legal fiction” in an “Alice in Wonderland scenario” the court is bound by, defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on PA: Sometimes a police-citizen encounter is “a legal fiction” in an “Alice in Wonderland scenario,” like here, but they’re bound by it

N.-M.: Statement attenuated from unlawful cell phone seizure

Defendant was arrested after NCIS forced entry into his barracks room arresting him at gunpoint coming out of the shower for allegations of sexual conversations with an minor. NCIS seized his cell phone without a search authorization. Ultimately, his cell … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Cell phones | Comments Off on N.-M.: Statement attenuated from unlawful cell phone seizure

W.D.Va.: IAC claim over how to argue GFE fails

This 2255 petitioner argued his defense lawyer didn’t properly argue application of the good faith exception in the direct appeal, but doesn’t say how the case could have come out different. Also, the briefs and opinion on appeal show that … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Knock and announce, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: IAC claim over how to argue GFE fails

SC permits SW issuing judges to testify to PC. But why? It’s a question of law.

Search warrant issuing judges can testify in South Carolina to why they found probable cause. [Why? Probable cause is a question of law everywhere else in the United States.] The omission of some information didn’t change the probable cause analysis, … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on SC permits SW issuing judges to testify to PC. But why? It’s a question of law.

OR: Proximity to others probably committing a crime isn’t PC

“[T]he facts supporting [the officer’s] belief that defendant committed a crime were not specific to defendant and related instead to defendant’s proximity to drug use by others.” “Because the totality of the circumstances here fail to demonstrate a probability that … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on OR: Proximity to others probably committing a crime isn’t PC

MO: Traffic stop not custodial for Miranda

A traffic stop is not a custodial arrest requiring Miranda warnings. Defendant’s admissions he had drugs wasn’t excludable. State v. Ybarra, 2021 Mo. App. LEXIS 1031 (Nov. 23, 2021). Not objecting to the state offering a search warrant application into … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Custody, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Traffic stop not custodial for Miranda

E.D.Mich.: CI’s information showed almost nothing as to one property for SW, so no PC nor GFE

The affidavit for the warrant for one particular address in this case fails to even minimally show probable cause. “Here, there was not enough information in the affidavit to allow a reasonable officer to conclude that there was sufficient ‘ongoing … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: CI’s information showed almost nothing as to one property for SW, so no PC nor GFE

D.Neb.: Jardines does not prohibit a knock-and-talk

Jardines does not prohibit a knock-and-talk as long as the officers enter via the normal path. United States v. Hartford, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226452 (D.Neb. Nov. 24, 2021). A protective sweep of defendant’s car was reasonable, despite his being … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Jardines does not prohibit a knock-and-talk

NY Bronx: Front stoop of a multifamily dwelling isn’t protected curtilage

The front stoop of a multifamily dwelling in the Bronx isn’t protected curtilage. In re of Y.N., 2021 NY Slip Op 51108(U), 2021 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 5975 (Bronx Co. Family Nov. 12, 2021) (unpublished):

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on NY Bronx: Front stoop of a multifamily dwelling isn’t protected curtilage

N.D.Fla.: Temporary beachfront closure because of Covid restrictions not a 4A seizure

Temporary closure of part of plaintiffs’ beach use inland from the public beach because of Covid restrictions was not a Fifth Amendment taking nor a Fourth Amendment seizure. Ki Fla. Properties v. Walton County, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226830 (N.D.Fla. … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Temporary beachfront closure because of Covid restrictions not a 4A seizure

CA9: No standing in pole camera surveillance of house of another

Defendant doesn’t have standing to challenge prolonged pole camera surveillance of the property of another. Also, there was reasonable suspicion on the totality including collective knowledge to extend defendant’s stop for a drug dog. United States v. Cruz, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Pole cameras, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: No standing in pole camera surveillance of house of another

N.D.Tex.: Syringe in back pocket was in plain view

The court finds the syringe in defendant’s back pocket was in plain view. United States v. Riggins, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224594 (N.D.Tex. Nov. 22, 2021).* Defendant’s stop wasn’t unreasonably prolonged, so the dash and bodycam videos are not suppressed. … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Syringe in back pocket was in plain view

DE: Carpenter doesn’t apply to specific cell tower dumps obtained by SW

Carpenter doesn’t apply to specific cell tower dumps obtained by search warrant. “The warrants present in this case are not a top-to-bottom search of any and all stored data of the digital contents of the devices and ‘any other information/data … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on DE: Carpenter doesn’t apply to specific cell tower dumps obtained by SW