Author Archives: Hall

N.D.Ga.: 6 day delay in getting SW for seized cell phones not unreasonable

There was a six day delay between seizure of six cell phones and issuance of a search warrant for them. This was reasonable under CA11 precedent. Moreover, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Norwood, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: 6 day delay in getting SW for seized cell phones not unreasonable

OH11: No RS for frisking a slumbering motorist

Police were called to a man slumped over his steering wheel maybe passed out. They roused him. Defendant’s patdown was not justified by reasonable suspicion. State v. Shoenberger, 2022-Ohio-253, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 232 (11th Jan. 31, 2022). Defendant’s roadside … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH11: No RS for frisking a slumbering motorist

E.D.N.C.: Police entry into a commercial gym with an unauthorized keycard violated the owner’s REP

Plaintiff operated a gym entered by the police for an administrative search during Covid when it should have been temporarily closed under a state executive order. They accessed it with a keycard from the prior owner who sold it years … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Police entry into a commercial gym with an unauthorized keycard violated the owner’s REP

W.D.Ky.: Confiscation of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not a 4A

“Because it is the First and Fourteenth Amendment, and not the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure that protects against the reading and confiscation of legal mail by prison officials, the Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Confiscation of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not a 4A

E.D.Mich.: No standing to claim knock-and-announce violation of another’s house

Plaintiff has no standing to complain of a knock-and-announce violation of another person. “Here, Plaintiff does not even claim that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in McMullen’s house. But even if he did make such a claim, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No standing to claim knock-and-announce violation of another’s house

CA1 denies rehearing en banc on Jardines and denies qualified immunity

French v. Merrill, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 2625 (1st Cir. Jan. 28, 2022) (3-3*) (panel decision 15 F.4th 116 (1st Cir. Oct. 1, 2021)). On why rehearing should not be granted:

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1 denies rehearing en banc on Jardines and denies qualified immunity

CA9: Govt “tucked” independent source argument into another and then abandoned it for years; not fully developed

The government’s independent source argument was (1) tucked into another argument and then not fully developed, and (2) then essentially abandoned for years during the litigation. It was not fully developed. United States v. Osborne, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 2682 … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA9: Govt “tucked” independent source argument into another and then abandoned it for years; not fully developed

CA6: Where there was a threat in the house on the second floor, it wasn’t unreasonable for officers to go check it out

“We have held, however, that ‘[w]ithin a few seconds of reasonably perceiving a sufficient danger, officers may use deadly force even if in hindsight the facts show that the persons threatened could have escaped unharmed.’ … Though different decisions on … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: Where there was a threat in the house on the second floor, it wasn’t unreasonable for officers to go check it out

Cal.4: GPS monitoring with a search waiver were reasonable conditions of home confinement

GPS monitoring with a search waiver were reasonable conditions of defendant’s home confinement sentence. People v. Gerson, 2022 Cal. App. LEXIS 72 (4th Dist. Jan. 28, 2022). “Although Defendant complied with Franks by (1) specifically identifying the portion of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.4: GPS monitoring with a search waiver were reasonable conditions of home confinement

D.N.M.: Failure to incorporate attachments to SW affidavit subject to GFE

The attachments to the affidavits were attached but not incorporated by words in the affidavit. The court doesn’t decide that this is a Fourth Amendment violation because the good faith exception applies. The search of a cell phone attempted within … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Failure to incorporate attachments to SW affidavit subject to GFE

E.D.Cal.: Overbreadth argument has to be developed; court won’t make it for you

The officer picking up defendant’s cell phone and the screen lighting up was not a search. It was inadvertent, and the phone had to be picked up to do anything with it. Even if it was, the exclusionary rule should … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Overbreadth argument has to be developed; court won’t make it for you

S.D.Ohio: There is no the state courts got it “really wrong” exception to Stone

“Paraphrased, this amounts to arguing that if the state courts got the Fourth Amendment issues really wrong, the habeas court can put Stone aside and decide the merits of the Fourth Amendment claims. [¶] Hashi cites no authority in support … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: There is no the state courts got it “really wrong” exception to Stone

MO: Prosecutor can’t be sued for making a file decision based on the search of ptf’s computer

Plaintiff sued a prosecutor for various things including the “privacy tort ‘of unreasonable intrusion into private facts.’” His computer was searched under a warrant and potential privileged material was obtained. Plaintiff’s own complaint says the prosecutor was given the information … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on MO: Prosecutor can’t be sued for making a file decision based on the search of ptf’s computer

D.Colo.: No REP in the “people’s house” on 1/6 because ptf wasn’t there

Plaintiff is an attorney pro se alleging, inter alia, a Fourth Amendment violation in Colorado against a member of the House of Representatives for the January 6th insurrection. He claims a Fourth Amendment in the “people’s house” when he doesn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Colo.: No REP in the “people’s house” on 1/6 because ptf wasn’t there

OH10: No REP in possession of a stolen laptop that sent its location information

Appellant’s motion to reopen his appeal to reargue his Fourth Amendment claims is denied. Not one thing he proffers can change the outcome of the appeal. There was a basis for a GPS warrant on his vehicle, and there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on OH10: No REP in possession of a stolen laptop that sent its location information

S.D.Ind.: The state used Google satellite images to corroborate officer’s testimony of stop

The government used Google satellite images and distancing to corroborate the officer’s testimony defendant didn’t signal his turn in time. After the stop, the smell of marijuana was apparent. United States v. Miles, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14860 (S.D.Ind. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Excessive force | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: The state used Google satellite images to corroborate officer’s testimony of stop

CA1: Third-party doctrine applies to prescription drug monitoring program

This is an action to enforce a DEA administrative subpoena to the New Hampshire Prescription Drug Monitoring Program for specific prescriptions. The court declines to equate prescription records with other medical records because the pharmacy industry is closely regulated. It … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA1: Third-party doctrine applies to prescription drug monitoring program

DC: Possession of a knife doesn’t mean RS for possession of a firearm

A warrant for premises found a visitor there, and the record shows nothing about why he was searched and the trial court upheld it. “As discussed, the factors the trial court relied upon to validate the patdown of Mr. Bingman—his … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk, Voluntariness | Comments Off on DC: Possession of a knife doesn’t mean RS for possession of a firearm

NY1: PC to arrest and to search are different things

Probable cause to arrest and to search are different things. (One doesn’t automatically lead to the other.) Salcedo v. City of New York, 2022 NY Slip Op 00523, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 501 (1st Dept. Jan. 27, 2022). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on NY1: PC to arrest and to search are different things

CA8: Ptfs stated claim to overcome qualified immunity and arguable probable cause during mass arrests of peaceful protesters

Qualified immunity was denied for officers who were alleged to have arrested peaceful protestors in St. Louis in 2017. People were allowed to enter an area and then were arrested. As to force, “The pleadings before us and video evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Ptfs stated claim to overcome qualified immunity and arguable probable cause during mass arrests of peaceful protesters