Author Archives: Hall

C.D.Cal.: Eastman’s claim 1/6 House Committee’s subpoena is without authority or overbroad is denied

John Eastman’s claims against the Jan. 6 House Committee subpoena for records fail on his claim for injunctive relief. (Attorney-client privilege will be taken up later.) Eastman v. Thompson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25546 (C.D.Cal. Jan. 25, 2022). On the … Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Eastman’s claim 1/6 House Committee’s subpoena is without authority or overbroad is denied

WaPo: As lethal fentanyl flows across Mexico border, CBP tries powerful scanning technology

WaPo: As lethal fentanyl flows across Mexico border, CBP tries powerful scanning technology by Nick Miroff (“With fatal drug overdose deaths in the United States soaring to record levels, Congress has directed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to come up … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on WaPo: As lethal fentanyl flows across Mexico border, CBP tries powerful scanning technology

E.D.N.Y.: Attenuation doctrine applies to this SEC interview; in dicta, no 4A violation

Even assuming the exclusionary rule applies to the SEC in this case, the attenuation doctrine applies. There is no direct or indirect evidence derived from the SEC’s action. As to the direct, “The Court finds that, even if the exclusionary … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Attenuation doctrine applies to this SEC interview; in dicta, no 4A violation

AP: Man whose home was bombed by police holds off on rebuilding

AP: Man whose home was bombed by police holds off on rebuilding:

Posted in Search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AP: Man whose home was bombed by police holds off on rebuilding

NYTimes: I Used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS Tracker to Watch My Husband’s Every Move

NYTimes: I Used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS Tracker to Watch My Husband’s Every Move by Kashmir Hill (“A vast location-tracking network is being built around us so we don’t lose our keys: One couple’s adventures in the consumer … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: I Used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS Tracker to Watch My Husband’s Every Move

AL adopts new crime exception to exclusionary rule

When being arrested, defendant pulled away from officers in his room and dove for his bed and reached under a pillow. Officers thought he was going for a gun, and a melee ensued. He was charged with assault and resisting … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, Independent source | Comments Off on AL adopts new crime exception to exclusionary rule

HI: When valid SW executed, no 5A taking involved

When a valid search warrant is executed, there is no Fifth Amendment taking. Young v. Haw. Island Humane Soc’y S.P.C.A., 2022 Haw. App. LEXIS 21 (Feb. 9, 2022) (unpublished). “Here, the totality of the circumstances then appearing to the officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Warrant execution | Comments Off on HI: When valid SW executed, no 5A taking involved

SD: Call about a mere “argument” at 2:48 am didn’t support def’s stop leaving apartment parking lot

The community caretaking exception did not apply to defendant’s stop leaving an apartment parking lot at 2:48 am. A child called the police about an argument in the house, but nothing in the call or the report from dispatch indicated … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on SD: Call about a mere “argument” at 2:48 am didn’t support def’s stop leaving apartment parking lot

N.D.Ill.: A “network of pole cameras” doesn’t violate 4A

Five pole cameras were trained on defendant’s house. A “network of pole cameras” isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. See United States v. Tuggle, 4 F.4th 505 (7th Cir. 2021). Moreover, he does not rebut the presumption of good faith with … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception, Pole cameras | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: A “network of pole cameras” doesn’t violate 4A

MA: State law requires PC for pole camera surveillance, and officers had it

Pole camera surveillance in Massachusetts requires probable cause to set it up. Officers had it in defendant’s case, and his front door and left side of his house were watched for 15 days. Commonwealth v. Comenzo, 2022 Mass. LEXIS 54 … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Pole cameras | Comments Off on MA: State law requires PC for pole camera surveillance, and officers had it

E.D.N.Y.: No REP in pawnshop records uploaded to pawnshop detail

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in pawnshop records uploaded for the NYPD pawnshop detail. (Therefore, in the trial of this case, attacking the datamining of the NYPD for information is more prejudicial than relevant under F.R.E. 403.) Gem … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: No REP in pawnshop records uploaded to pawnshop detail

E.D.Pa.: Tearing down plaintiff’s building was a seizure under Soldal

Tearing down plaintiff’s building was a seizure under Soldal. The record thus far precludes summary judgment. Dvortsova v. City of Philadelphia, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23868 (E.D.Pa. Feb. 9, 2022). Defendant’s 2255 claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Tearing down plaintiff’s building was a seizure under Soldal

E.D.Va.: Guilty plea with waiver of 4A claim not judicial estoppel to § 1983 claim

Plaintiff’s guilty plea in federal court was a waiver of his Fourth Amendment claims, and that was not judicial estoppel to a § 1983 case over the merits. Moreover, because the independent source doctrine was involved, the Heck bar did … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Guilty plea with waiver of 4A claim not judicial estoppel to § 1983 claim

OH4: No standing in codef’s patdown

Defendant has no standing to challenge a codefendant’s patdown. In addition, admission of his jail calls was not a Fifth Amendment violation. (Finally, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for withdrawing a motion to suppress that was destined to fail.) State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on OH4: No standing in codef’s patdown

DC: Even if def was illegally arrested, his identification is not suppressed

Even if defendant was illegally arrested, his identification is not suppressed. Hood v. United States, 2022 D.C. App. LEXIS 57 (Feb. 10, 2022):

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on DC: Even if def was illegally arrested, his identification is not suppressed

DC: Throwing backpack over a wall running from police is abandonment

The police gave chase to defendant, and he ran down an alley and threw his backpack over a wall into somebody else’s backyard. “In the present case, we assume without deciding that Mr. Kyle retained a subjective expectation of privacy … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on DC: Throwing backpack over a wall running from police is abandonment

D.Minn.: Govt’s suggestion in briefing in opposition to motion to suppress CI was a witness requires disclosure

The government’s brief in opposition to defendant’s motion to suppress suggests that the CI is a potential witness here, so the government is ordered to disclose his or her ID. Disclosure is enough. The court won’t go so far as … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Govt’s suggestion in briefing in opposition to motion to suppress CI was a witness requires disclosure

D.N.J.: Prosecutor absolutely immune for SW application

A prosecutor is absolutely immune in presenting search warrant applications to a court. Miller v. Rivas, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22754 (D.N.J. Feb. 8, 2022). The affidavit for search warrant here was based on probable cause. The executing officers waited … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Prosecutor absolutely immune for SW application

NY2: Def stated IAC claim that defense counsel never looked at SW materials

Defendant stated a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel that defense counsel never obtained the search warrant materials to even investigate. Reversed to have the state produce it. People v. Tindley, 2022 NY Slip Op 00886, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NY2: Def stated IAC claim that defense counsel never looked at SW materials

CA11: Not clearly established warning required before use of deadly force

It was not well established that police need to warn armed people before shooting them. Here, the shooting victim was an innocent homeowner who had a gun on him around his own house investigating a prowler, and the police saw … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Not clearly established warning required before use of deadly force