Author Archives: Hall

Techdirt: Law Prof Suggests Geofence Warrants Are A Net Gain For The Public, Even If They Invert The Probable Cause Standard

Techdirt: Law Prof Suggests Geofence Warrants Are A Net Gain For The Public, Even If They Invert The Probable Cause Standard by Tim Cushing (“On March 9th, we covered a Virginia court’s decision to reject a geofence/‘reverse’ warrant as unconstitutional. … Continue reading →

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on Techdirt: Law Prof Suggests Geofence Warrants Are A Net Gain For The Public, Even If They Invert The Probable Cause Standard

Two on informant hearsay

“The information provided to the agents came from a vetted CS who had known Thomas for years. The CS’s information, as noted above, was then corroborated using audio recordings and physical surveillance as well as the agents’ independent check of … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Two on informant hearsay

Free defense CLE on technology warrants

NACDL: 2022 NACDL and the Samuelson Clinic’s Seminar: Unlocking the Black Box, free CLE on technology warrants in Chicago May 16-17.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Free defense CLE on technology warrants

CA7: Younger and immunity bar ptf’s § 1983 claim against search

Plaintiff’s claims that the parties conspired to falsify evidence of this search against him, aside from being fantastical, was barred by Younger and qualified or absolute immunity for all the parties. Shaw v. Cnty. of Milwaukee, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Younger and immunity bar ptf’s § 1983 claim against search

E.D.La.: Photographs taken before SW issued or the SW are not suppressed, they had nothing to do with getting the SW

Metadata in photographs of defendant’s property show that they were taken before the search warrant was issued. The search warrant was going to issue anyway, and nothing relied upon the photographs. Denied. United States v. Jefferson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Photographs taken before SW issued or the SW are not suppressed, they had nothing to do with getting the SW

NJ: Facebook searches require SWs, not intercept orders

A communication data warrant requires probable cause. Facebook’s data in hand is not “intercepted” for wiretapping purposes. Facebook, Inc. v. State, 2022 N.J. Super. LEXIS 40 (Apr. 4, 2022):

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on NJ: Facebook searches require SWs, not intercept orders

MI drone over curtilage case update

In the Michigan drone over the curtilage case (posted here), Long Lake Twp. v. Maxon, the parties are directed to brief application of the exclusionary rule to zoning disputes:

Posted in Curtilage, Drones | Comments Off on MI drone over curtilage case update

SCOTUS: Thompson v. Clark

Thompson v. Clark, 2022 U.S. LEXIS 1885 (Apr. 4, 2022) (ScotusBlog: “Larry Thompson’s showing that his criminal prosecution ended without a conviction satisfies the requirement to demonstrate a favorable termination of a criminal prosecution in a Fourth Amendment claim under … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Thompson v. Clark

Reason: One Cheer for Stephen Breyer

Reason: One Cheer for Stephen Breyer by Damon Root:

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: One Cheer for Stephen Breyer

CA6: There was PC for SW for real time pinging of def’s cell phone

There was probable cause for a search warrant for real time pinging of defendant’s cell phone to try and find out where he was. United States v. Ennis, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8779 (6th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022). Defendant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: There was PC for SW for real time pinging of def’s cell phone

CA8: Car seizure for overtinting and inventory were reasonable

Defendant’s car was permissibly seized for overtinting, and the subsequent search was reasonable as inventory. United States v. Perez, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8697 (8th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022).* “Even assuming arguendo that Thrasher could make a substantial preliminary showing … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA8: Car seizure for overtinting and inventory were reasonable

E.D.N.Y.: Visual surveillance of a car in a parking lot is not a search; no REP in the license plate

Visual surveillance of plaintiff’s car in a parking lot is not a search. “Mr. Porter alleges that Investigator Tucci committed an unreasonable search by conducting surveillance of his vehicle in a parking lot and by looking up his plate and … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Visual surveillance of a car in a parking lot is not a search; no REP in the license plate

WaPo: Cryptocurrency could help governments and businesses spy on us

WaPo: Cryptocurrency could help governments and businesses spy on us by Eswar Prasad (“The popularity of digital currencies like bitcoin could erode the last vestiges of financial privacy online”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Cryptocurrency could help governments and businesses spy on us

CA7: Def’s detention during protective sweep looking for another was unreasonable

Defendant’s detention in an apartment building during a protective sweep for a fugitive that clearly wasn’t him was unreasonable. The district court’s denial of the motion to suppress is reversed. United States v. Segoviano, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8771 (7th … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Def’s detention during protective sweep looking for another was unreasonable

MA: Cell “tower dumps” require SW on PC

Cell “tower dump” of all numbers connected to it requires a search warrant issued on probable cause. Here it was lacking. Commonwealth v. Perry, 2022 Mass. LEXIS 151 (Apr. 1, 2022):

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on MA: Cell “tower dumps” require SW on PC

MO: Def’s actions when coming upon a ruse checkpoint on I-44 was RS

“[T]he procedures of the ruse drug checkpoint, coupled with Defendant’s conduct of abruptly changing lanes and taking Exit 33 at the last second, meets the standard for individualized suspicion required by Edmond and Mack.” State v. Barnum, 2022 Mo. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Def’s actions when coming upon a ruse checkpoint on I-44 was RS

CA6: Misidentification and 24 days in jail for wrong man not shown to be pattern for city liability

“‘Benny’ Lopez of Traverse City sold heroin to a confidential informant working with the Traverse Narcotics Team in northern Michigan. ‘Benjamin’ Lopez of Grand Rapids did not. Yet officers arrested Benjamin, not Benny, for this crime. The wrong Lopez languished … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Misidentification and 24 days in jail for wrong man not shown to be pattern for city liability

D.Mass.: A foreign law enforcement agency can be a CI, and these are the standards

“Given these facts, the Magistrate Judge reasonably relied on the foreign agency’s tip in concluding that probable cause existed to issue the search warrant because (1) ‘a tip from one federal law enforcement agency to another implies a degree of … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mass.: A foreign law enforcement agency can be a CI, and these are the standards

N.D.Ga.: No standing from hiding a gun and clip in the breakfast area of a hotel

Defendant has no standing to contest police finding his gun and clip he hid in separate cabinets in the breakfast area of his hotel. United States v. Blakely, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59245 (N.D.Ga. Feb. 28, 2022),* adopted, 2022 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No standing from hiding a gun and clip in the breakfast area of a hotel

OH11: Dragging out the stop a few minutes to allow drug dog to arrive made it unreasonable

In a state where the appellate courts are overly solicitous of police calling for drug dog sniffs in traffic stops, this court finds the stop prolonged for the drug dog to get there without reasonable suspicion. Neyhard v. State, 2022-Ohio-1098, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH11: Dragging out the stop a few minutes to allow drug dog to arrive made it unreasonable