E.D.N.Y.: Visual surveillance of a car in a parking lot is not a search; no REP in the license plate

Visual surveillance of plaintiff’s car in a parking lot is not a search. “Mr. Porter alleges that Investigator Tucci committed an unreasonable search by conducting surveillance of his vehicle in a parking lot and by looking up his plate and vehicle registration in a database without ‘reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.’ Pl.’s Opp’n 5-6. But Investigator Tucci did not need reasonable suspicion for those activities. Ordinary visual surveillance from a public place does not amount to a search.” Porter v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61007 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022)

The Pennsylvania AG obtained a search warrant for records for insurance disability fraud. Federal crimes were revealed. The warrants were issued on probable cause and were particular enough. United States v. Capozzi, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8712 (3d Cir. Apr. 1, 2022).*

Aside from citing the wrong authority to begin with, “Reasonable jurists would also agree that it was not unreasonable for the state court to conclude that Winbush failed to make the requisite showing of prejudice under Strickland. Winbush failed to show that the non-litigated suppression motions would have been meritorious.” Winbush v. Boyd, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8732 (6th Cir. Mar. 31, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.