CA6: There was PC for SW for real time pinging of def’s cell phone

There was probable cause for a search warrant for real time pinging of defendant’s cell phone to try and find out where he was. United States v. Ennis, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8779 (6th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022).

Defendant was a parolee, and his story about who owned the car he was driving added up to reasonable suspicion. It was his cousin’s but then he didn’t know anything about his cousin. United States v. Chan-Guillen, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61398 (D.N.J. Apr. 1, 2021).*

Defendants’ stop for overtinted windows was reasonable even if it should have turned out the officer was reasonably mistaken as to how much. United States v. Rothwell, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61447 (E.D.Ky. Apr. 1, 2022),* R&R 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61591 (E.D.Ky. Feb. 8, 2022).*

The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s home and workplace was based on probable cause from the “extensive affidavit” showing how the fraud scheme was believed to work and where things would be. United States v. Castro, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61410 (D.Nev. Mar. 30, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.