Author Archives: Hall

S.D.Ohio: Def was seized by blocking his car in, even if officers didn’t intend it

Defendant’s vehicle was blocked in by a police car, and a reasonable person would only believe he’d been seized whether the officers believed it or not. This was not justified by reasonable suspicion. His consent was thus not voluntary. “None … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Def was seized by blocking his car in, even if officers didn’t intend it

CA7: Bail hearing doesn’t have to be in 48 hours if a PC determination was

There is no hard rule that a bail hearing has to happen within 48 hours of arrest. PC finding, yes; bail, no. “[P]recedent dictates that only a probable-cause determination must be held within forty-eight hours. The constitutionally required timing of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Bail hearing doesn’t have to be in 48 hours if a PC determination was

MD: Smell of marijuana from a group of juveniles was RS for patdown but not PC

Even with marijuana being partly legal, possession of more than 10 grams was a crime. The smell of marijuana from a group permitted a frisk, and a gun was found on one. “Although that odor, without more, does not provide … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on MD: Smell of marijuana from a group of juveniles was RS for patdown but not PC

GA: Trial questions about SW affidavit properly excluded where officer didn’t prepare affidavit

Trial questions to one officer about alleged false statements in a search warrant affidavit attributed to him but where it was not written by him were excluded. This was not an abuse of discretion since he wasn’t the affiant. Harris … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on GA: Trial questions about SW affidavit properly excluded where officer didn’t prepare affidavit

M.D.Pa.: Trash pull corroborated CI

Here a trash pull corroborated the CI. United States v. Ledee, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109859 (M.D. Pa. June 21, 2022). Defendant’s traffic stop for crossing the fog line was supported by the dashcam video. United States v. Webb, 2022 … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Trash pull corroborated CI

IL: Requirement of some testing of fire sprinkler system doesn’t require a search

A condominium association installed a newer fire protection system, and it was subject to annual testing. The ordinance only required it be tested by somebody, and who would likely be a contractor. It did not compel a search under the … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Private search, Waiver | Comments Off on IL: Requirement of some testing of fire sprinkler system doesn’t require a search

CA3: Not plain error to fail to exclude potential prejudicial testimony about risk of violence in execution of SW

Testimony about how a search warrant was executed as it was could have prejudiced defendant by revealing the government thought he was violent before arrest. It was not, however, plain error on this record without an objection. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA3: Not plain error to fail to exclude potential prejudicial testimony about risk of violence in execution of SW

CA2: FAA information about movements of airplane gave DEA RS for stop on tarmac

The FAA’s information about the movements of defendant’s single engine airplane gave the DEA reasonable suspicion to stop it on the tarmac. Then officers developed probable cause. United States v. Bodnar, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 17035 (2d Cir. June 21, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: FAA information about movements of airplane gave DEA RS for stop on tarmac

CA5: Def’s actions showed he consented to entry into house

The evidence supports the district court’s conclusion defendant consented to the second entry of his home. His actions and turning to lead officers into his house showed consent. United States v. Lozano, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 16894 (5th Cir. June … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: Def’s actions showed he consented to entry into house

D.Conn.: Handcuffing did not turn this stop into an arrest

Handcuffing did not turn this stop into an arrest. United States v. Walker, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108170 (D.Conn. June 17, 2022).* Petitioner’s 2254 claim was based on ineffective assistance of counsel for waiver of his claim that he was … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Handcuffing did not turn this stop into an arrest

D.Ariz.: PC so lacking, “this is a no-brainer”

“The Court finds that the search warrant affidavit comes nowhere near to establishing probable cause for the search of the cell phone. Simply put, this is a no-brainer. In fact, the government’s conclusory argument noted above demonstrates the futility of … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: PC so lacking, “this is a no-brainer”

KY: REP in CSLI

There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s CSLI. One can have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her movements on public roads. Commonwealth v. Reed, 2022 Ky. LEXIS 132 (June 16, 2022):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on KY: REP in CSLI

CA6: A police order to come out of one’s house is a seizure

“These cases clearly establish that forced compliance with orders is a Fourth Amendment seizure. Mendenhall and Saari establish that words that compel compliance with the officer’s orders to exit a house constitute a seizure. Thus, when taking the facts in … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: A police order to come out of one’s house is a seizure

NY3: SW two months after shooting was not stale where police were still investigating

The victim was shot in July 2016. In August, the police got a search warrant for his place and found nothing connecting him to it. In September, they got a second search warrant for a second place and found guns, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on NY3: SW two months after shooting was not stale where police were still investigating

WY: State failed to show implied consent to enter home

A sheriff’s deputy showed up at defendant’s house to talk to her. He encountered her husband outside. The husband went in to get his wife, and the officer followed into the mudroom. There was no implied consent for the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WY: State failed to show implied consent to enter home

CA8: Shove was not a seizure

A mere shove was not a Fourth Amendment seizure nor excessive force. Martinez v. Sasse, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 16624 (8th Cir. June 16, 2022):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Shove was not a seizure

WI: Search incident for shoplifting permitted search of small canister on keychain

Defendant was arrested for shoplifting, and, on her arrest, a search incident of a small canister attached to her keychain was reasonable, despite it being so small no evidence of theft would be there. State v. Meisenhelder, 2022 Wisc. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on WI: Search incident for shoplifting permitted search of small canister on keychain

WI: On remand in Mitchell v. Wisconsin blood draw reasonable

On remand from Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 139 S. Ct. 2525, 2539 (2019), defendant’s blood draw was reasonable. State v. Mitchell, 2022 Wisc. App. LEXIS 518 (June 15, 2022): When the Mitchell Court remanded this case, it did so for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on WI: On remand in Mitchell v. Wisconsin blood draw reasonable

IA: Failure to articulate why state const. applies for different result is waiver

Failure to articulate one’s argument that the state constitution requires a different result is waiver. State v. Versteegh, 2022 Iowa App. LEXIS 434 (June 15, 2022). “Here, the issuing judge reasonably concluded, based on all of the circumstances, that there … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on IA: Failure to articulate why state const. applies for different result is waiver

E.D.Tex.: Whether RV was immobile and used as a residence doesn’t matter where GFE applies

“In his third numbered objection, Lee argues that contrary to Officer Kennedy’s testimony, the RV was completely immobile at the time it was searched and that it was being used as a residence. But whether the RV was mobile or … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Whether RV was immobile and used as a residence doesn’t matter where GFE applies