Author Archives: Hall

N.D.Iowa: Car transporter has common authority to consent

A car being hauled west was searched on the car hauler’s truck by consent of the hauler. He had common authority to do that. Moreover, defendant’s standing as to the vehicle was tenuous at best. Registration had expired before the … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Car transporter has common authority to consent

N.D.Ill.: Border search exception doesn’t permit cell phone search for proof of a prior domestic crime

The border search exception does not apply to searching defendant’s cell phone at Customs for proof of a domestic crime, here mail theft. United States v. Carpenter, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11014 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 23, 2023). The drug dog … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Border search exception doesn’t permit cell phone search for proof of a prior domestic crime

M.D.Ga.: Officer isn’t obliged to mention he could smell marijuana coming from the car

An officer smelling marijuana in a car isn’t obliged to tell the motorist he could for it to be true. United States v. Perkins, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10564 (M.D. Ga. Jan. 19, 2023). At worst, the officer’s false statement … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Waiver | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: Officer isn’t obliged to mention he could smell marijuana coming from the car

ND: Trial court’s finding of investigatory purpose for inventory search supported by record

The district court found that the purported inventory search was really for investigatory purposes, and the evidence supports that conclusion. The inevitable discovery exception also does not apply here. State v. Krall, 2023 ND 8, 2023 N.D. LEXIS 9 (Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Inventory, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on ND: Trial court’s finding of investigatory purpose for inventory search supported by record

ABA: Katz or Dogs? Why the Katz Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Test Is More Applicable to Advancing Technology than a Test Applied to Dog Sniffs

Katz or Dogs? Why the Katz Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Test Is More Applicable to Advancing Technology than a Test Applied to Dog Sniffs by Blade M. Allen (ABA Criminal Justice Jan. 23, 2023). (And I’m tired of cutsy Katz … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ABA: Katz or Dogs? Why the Katz Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Test Is More Applicable to Advancing Technology than a Test Applied to Dog Sniffs

CT: Automobile exception still applied even though def was arrested 500′ from car

Defendant was arrested 500′ from his car. The car was still subject to the automobile exception because there was enough connection. He still had the keys on him. State v. Griffin, 2023 Conn. App. LEXIS 8 (Jan. 24, 2023):

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on CT: Automobile exception still applied even though def was arrested 500′ from car

E.D.Pa.: Failure to specify in 2255 how 4A was violated is waiver

In a 2255 ineffective assistance claim, “Defendant fails to specify either how his Fourth Amendment rights were violated or what evidence counsel should have sought to suppress.” That alone is enough to deny. It’s denied on the merits, too. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Failure to specify in 2255 how 4A was violated is waiver

CA3: Going from home to a drug deal is nexus to the home

“Contrary to Torres’ arguments, when an individual is suspected of dealing narcotics, probable cause to search his home does not demand a showing that he deals those narcotics at his home. The common-sense likelihood that drug dealers keep evidence of … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA3: Going from home to a drug deal is nexus to the home

KY: Defs showed enough to get a post-conviction hearing officers planted drugs they pled guilty to

Defendants moved to vacate guilty pleas for drug possession after the officers involved were federally indicted for planting drugs on suspects. The trial court denied without a hearing because of the guilty pleas. The CoA reversed and ordered a hearing. … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on KY: Defs showed enough to get a post-conviction hearing officers planted drugs they pled guilty to

OH6: State could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search

The state could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search. State v. Roberts, 2023-Ohio-142, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 131 (6th Dist. Jan. 18, 2023). The facts in isolation may not show reasonable suspicion but … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OH6: State could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search

E.D.Tenn.: Backyard firepit was part of curtilage

A firepit in defendant’s yard (an “outdoor living area”) was part of the curtilage. The officer, however, was lawfully on the curtilage for a knock-and-talk. United States v. Thurman, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9358 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 19, 2023).* Sometimes … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Backyard firepit was part of curtilage

CA2: Arrested at gunpoint, handcuffed, and unMirandized, def still consented

Defendant had been arrested and handcuffed and officers had weapons drawn, and he hadn’t yet been Mirandized. Still, on the totality, he consented to the search. United States v. Collins, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 1257 (2d Cir. Jan. 19, 2023). … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: Arrested at gunpoint, handcuffed, and unMirandized, def still consented

S.D.Ill.: When moving to suppress “data” one has to be specific

Defendant’s motion to suppress “data” and “associated data” fails because of his failure to show what and where it was or could be. (It kind of becomes a general motion to suppress.) United States v. Smith, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: When moving to suppress “data” one has to be specific

AR: Claim state’s response to motion to suppress was judicial admission has to be presented to trial court

To argue that the state’s admissions in a response to a motion to suppress amount to a judicial admission of fact, the issue has to be argued to the trial court to preserve it. Otherwise, the trial court is free … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of pleading, DNA, Exclusionary rule, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Claim state’s response to motion to suppress was judicial admission has to be presented to trial court

CA4: Failure to turn on bodycam before frisk not shown to be in bad faith

Officer’s failure to turn on his bodycam before frisk here doesn’t require an adverse inference of destruction of evidence. Bad faith isn’t shown. United States v. Aguirre-Cuenca, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 1105 (4th Cir. Jan. 18, 2023). Defendant’s appeal is … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA4: Failure to turn on bodycam before frisk not shown to be in bad faith

By 2022, one would think that all would know planning a crime with Google searches would be incriminating; but no

Yahoo news: Brian Walshe pleads not guilty to murder: Everything we know about the case: In court Wednesday, prosecutor Lynn Beland said investigators believe Brian Walshe dismembered his wife and disposed of her remains after using their son’s iPad to … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on By 2022, one would think that all would know planning a crime with Google searches would be incriminating; but no

CA5: GFE to scope of search moots inquiring into PC

Because the good faith exception applied to the scope of search, the merits of the justification for the warrant is moot. United States v. Edwards, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 1032 (5th Cir. Jan. 17, 2023). A passenger didn’t have standing … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: GFE to scope of search moots inquiring into PC

S.D.N.Y.: Pending recalculation of time on parole didn’t affect legality of parole search

Defendant’s state remaining parole time was subjected to recalculation but it hadn’t happened by the time of the parole search based on a tip he had a firearm. Therefore it was reasonable. Alternatively, it was by consent. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Pending recalculation of time on parole didn’t affect legality of parole search

NC: Officer who had knowledge of driver’s medical disqualification from driving could make a stop

“Therefore, a law enforcement officer with either probable cause or reasonable suspicion to believe that the driver of a vehicle is driving with a medically canceled license may conduct a lawful traffic stop of that vehicle without running afoul of … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on NC: Officer who had knowledge of driver’s medical disqualification from driving could make a stop

DE: State habeas not for 4A claims

A state habeas petition is not how one presents a Fourth Amendment claim. Chrisden v. State, 2023 Del. LEXIS 17 (Jan. 13, 2023). Defendant’s traffic stop was factually justified. The smell of marijuana and his admissions gave probable cause to … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: State habeas not for 4A claims