Author Archives: Hall

CA6: Electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release

Defendant’s electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release. United States v. Ramadan, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23276 (6th Cir. Sep. 11, 2024). Plaintiff pleads an unreasonable strip search in prison, but the necessary … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: Electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release

N.D.Tex.: PC and GFE questions were close, and that’s good enough

The search warrant survives both a finding of probable cause and application of the good faith exception: “Here, the Court agrees with Defendant that the affidavit at issue presents a ‘close call’ as to whether the good-faith exception applies and … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: PC and GFE questions were close, and that’s good enough

Book Review of Unreasonable: Constitutionalizing Racism

Book Review: Jonathan P. Feingold, Constitutionalizing Racism, 104 B.U. L. Rev. Online 1 (2024):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Book Review of Unreasonable: Constitutionalizing Racism

N.D.Ga.: Exigency shown for warrantless entry to prevent destruction of drugs

The government showed exigency for what they feared was imminent destruction of drugs for a warrantless entry and protective sweep. Then a warrant was obtained with probable cause. United States v. Banks, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163658 (N.D. Ga. Aug. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Pretext, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Exigency shown for warrantless entry to prevent destruction of drugs

E.D.Cal.: Failure to provide medical care to an arrestee can be a 4A issue

Arrestee plaintiff pled due process, but it’s a Fourth Amendment claim for not “provid[ing] objectively reasonable post-arrest [medical] care to Plaintiff, a non-pretrial detainee, by ‘imped[ing] the medical staff from completing their task and pressuring them to discharge [Plaintiff],’ which … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Failure to provide medical care to an arrestee can be a 4A issue

TN: Def opened door to admit suppressed cell phone evidence by asking the one question too many

Defendant successfully kept out cell phone tracking records for lack of probable cause. “However, during trial, based on defense counsel’s question of whether there was any ‘physical evidence’ connecting Defendant to the case, the trial court ruled that Defendant opened … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Custody, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: Def opened door to admit suppressed cell phone evidence by asking the one question too many

MN: Order for buccal swab during pendency of case requires SW

A search warrant is required for a buccal swab after a criminal case is proceeding. State v. Steeprock, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 345 (July 29, 2024); State v. Jones, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 412 (Aug. 29, 2024). The search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MN: Order for buccal swab during pendency of case requires SW

W.D.Wash.: When a document is discussed in a SW affidavit, including the document isn’t required

When a written document is involved and discussed in a search warrant affidavit, including the document is not constitutionally required. Misstating it might make a Franks claim. United States v. Shetty, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161863 (W.D. Wash. Sep. 9, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: When a document is discussed in a SW affidavit, including the document isn’t required

D.Conn.: LEO accessing public social media accounts doesn’t implicate 4A

A prison security official’s accessing a potential visitor’s social media accounts to determine whether the visitor is some kind of security threat doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Lawrence v. Zack, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161377 (D. Conn. Sep. 9, 2024). … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Conn.: LEO accessing public social media accounts doesn’t implicate 4A

D.N.J.: Fictitious tags stop justifies SI

Based on circuit authority, a stop and arrest for fictitious tags justifies a search incident on the driver. United States v. Jones, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161352 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 9, 2024), quoting United States v. Travis, 2023 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Fictitious tags stop justifies SI

M.D.Pa.: Def’s Franks challenge fails for being vague as to what was inadequate and even which warrants were being challenged

“First, on a fundamental level, Bressi’s Franks request is insufficiently specific for this Court to reconstruct the warrants. Bressi does not point to a specific search warrant he claims was obtained through Agent O’Malley’s intentional or reckless disregard for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Def’s Franks challenge fails for being vague as to what was inadequate and even which warrants were being challenged

Harvard Law Review: Tech Companies’ Terms of Service Agreements Could Bring New Vitality to the Fourth Amendment

Harvard Law Review: Tech Companies’ Terms of Service Agreements Could Bring New Vitality to the Fourth Amendment by Brent Skorup [that is, if they choose to do anything about it]:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Harvard Law Review: Tech Companies’ Terms of Service Agreements Could Bring New Vitality to the Fourth Amendment

LATimes: She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a California prison. Now she won a $5.6-million settlement

LATimes: She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a California prison. Now she won a $5.6-million settlement by Terry Castleman (“When Christina Cardenas visited her husband in 2019 at the California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi, she was forced to … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on LATimes: She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a California prison. Now she won a $5.6-million settlement

AP: Ex-officer’s lies led to couple’s death in Houston drug raid, prosecutor tells jurors

AP: Ex-officer’s lies led to couple’s death in Houston drug raid, prosecutor tells jurors by Juan A. Lozano (“A former Houston police officer is responsible for the 2019 deaths of a couple during a raid of their home because his … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on AP: Ex-officer’s lies led to couple’s death in Houston drug raid, prosecutor tells jurors

TN: Cell phone recently calling deceased and it being at scene of murder was nexus

The state showed nexus to defendant’s iPhone and the crime by known recent calls between the co-conspirators and the victim and the phone being at the scene of the crime. State v. Young, 2024 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 397 (Sep. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on TN: Cell phone recently calling deceased and it being at scene of murder was nexus

W.D.Pa.: Losing suppression motion then pleading nolo was collateral estoppel in later civil case

Plaintiff raised a search issue in her underlying criminal case and lost. Later, she pled nolo and thus could not appeal. That’s final enough for collateral estoppel to apply in her § 1983 case. Harr v. Washington Area Humane Soc’y, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Losing suppression motion then pleading nolo was collateral estoppel in later civil case

MA: Investigative equal protection claim can be enforced by DA’s discovery failure

Defendant raised an equal protection claim about discovery of ShapChat search warrants. Defense counsel stated that an informal survey of defense lawyers handling about 1/4th of the cases in Suffolk County showed that 85% of the warrants were against black … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Investigative equal protection claim can be enforced by DA’s discovery failure

CA8: 4A requires no particular type of drug dog alert

“Collier also questions how Raptor alerted, suggesting that its alert was insufficiently ‘profound.’ … Our ‘probable cause inquiry is always fact specific.’ … Every dog is unique, and a dog that smells illicit drugs is not required to communicate with … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: 4A requires no particular type of drug dog alert

CA6: Minor property damage from executing a SW doesn’t make it 4A unreasonable

Minor property damage from executing a search warrant does not violate the Fourth Amendment. Carnett v. Chester Cty., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 22720 (6th Cir. Sep. 5, 2024):

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: Minor property damage from executing a SW doesn’t make it 4A unreasonable

D.S.D.: Misidentifying cell phone make in SW no error where number and pass code were correct

Misidentifying defendant’s cell phone for a search warrant as a Motorola when it was a Samsung is a mistake that can be overlooked. It had the phone number in the warrant and defendant’s pass code opened it. Finally, the good … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Misidentifying cell phone make in SW no error where number and pass code were correct