Author Archives: Hall

E.D.Wis.: Ptf’s claim judge’s signature on SW was forged fails for not even alleging there was a search

“The plaintiff similarly alleges that Miller forged a judge’s signature on a search warrant. But he does not say anything else about this search warrant. Did law enforcement execute the search warrant? What, or where, did they search? Did they … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Ptf’s claim judge’s signature on SW was forged fails for not even alleging there was a search

W.D.Mich.: Search and seizure Brady, even if there was one, wouldn’t change the outcome

Defendant makes a 2255 Brady claim about the information for his search and seizure. But, it doesn’t change the outcome. “Defendant fails to explain, and the Court fails to discern, how inclusion of the information Defendant sets forth in support … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: Search and seizure Brady, even if there was one, wouldn’t change the outcome

W.D.Mich.: State law violation in search irrelevant in federal prosecution

Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not arguing that state law was violated by the search in his federal case. Clark v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219107 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2024).* Defense counsel could not be ineffective … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: State law violation in search irrelevant in federal prosecution

CA4: “Reason to believe” under Gant is less than probable cause

“Reason to believe” under Gant is less than probable cause. United States v. Turner, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30565 (4th Cir. Dec. 4, 2024):

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on CA4: “Reason to believe” under Gant is less than probable cause

CA9: Arrest on mistaken warrant was objectively reasonable

Defendant’s arrest on a mistaken warrant was still objectively reasonable. The officer did all he could to verify defendant was the right guy. United States v. Nomee, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30533 (9th Cir. Dec. 4, 2024):

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest on mistaken warrant was objectively reasonable

MO: Def’s 4A ineffective assistance claim fails because he doesn’t show he’d prevail on the 4A claim

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim was based on defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress of a marital vehicle. He never, however, showed that he did, in fact, have standing. Moreover, the trial court found that the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on MO: Def’s 4A ineffective assistance claim fails because he doesn’t show he’d prevail on the 4A claim

C.D.Cal.: Requiring a building demolition permit doesn’t state a 4A claim

Requiring plaintiff to get a demolition permit of a building fails to state a claim because “Plaintiffs’ legal theory that the … actions result in a violation of their fourth amendments rights is unclear and conclusory.” Macy v. San Bernardino … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Requiring a building demolition permit doesn’t state a 4A claim

E.D.Cal.: Def’s arrest based on drunkenness was without PC

It’s clear from the testimony that the officer intended to arrest defendant, but it was without probable cause that he was so drunk he was a danger. The motion to suppress is granted, but the grounds change slightly on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Def’s arrest based on drunkenness was without PC

E.D.Tex.: Corporate Transparency Act enjoined, but 4A claim as yet unresolved

On the balance of equities, the Eastern District of Texas enjoins the Corporate Transparency Act going into effect January 1, 2025. “[T]he CTA requires a vast array of companies to disclose otherwise private stakeholder information to FinCEN. See 31 U.S.C. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Corporate Transparency Act enjoined, but 4A claim as yet unresolved

Hell Gate: 83 Percent of ShotSpotter Alerts Might Not Have Been Gunfire at All

Hell Gate: 83 Percent of ShotSpotter Alerts Might Not Have Been Gunfire at All by Nick Pinto (“ShotSpotter, the gunshot detection system used by the NYPD since 2015, doesn’t work—if what you mean by ‘work’ is ‘accurately alert police to … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Hell Gate: 83 Percent of ShotSpotter Alerts Might Not Have Been Gunfire at All

CA8: Use of SWAT team for no-knock drug warrant not clearly established as unreasonable

The use of the SWAT team to execute a no-knock drug warrant was not clearly established to be unreasonable in 2017 when this happened. Davis v. City of Little Rock, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30415 (8th Cir. Dec. 3, 2024):

Posted in Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: Use of SWAT team for no-knock drug warrant not clearly established as unreasonable

D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

In a motion to sever counts for trial, it was significant that the stuff was seized under the same search warrant. United States v. Lewis, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217086 (D.D.C. Dec. 2, 2024). There was probable cause and nexus … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

ID: City ordinance on trash collection did not create a REP in trash from police taking it

City ordinance on trash collection did not create a reasonable expectation of privacy in trash from police taking it for investigative purposes. State v. Pulizzi, 2024 Ida. LEXIS 132 (Nov. 29, 2024). The probation officer had a wealth of reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on ID: City ordinance on trash collection did not create a REP in trash from police taking it

HI: TSA check of powdery substance in luggage seen on x-ray was reasonable

TSA’s x-raying baggage at the Honolulu airport produced an unknown substance in a Ziploc bag that TSA could check to be sure it wasn’t explosives for an IED or other harmful thing. Here, it produced drugs, and the search was … Continue reading →

Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on HI: TSA check of powdery substance in luggage seen on x-ray was reasonable

MI: Leatherman tool on belt could be considered weapon for frisk

Defendant was well-known to be a meth abuser, and when he was stopped for a traffic offense and had a Leatherman tool on him, that could be considered usable as a weapon. People v. Babcock, 2024 Mich. App. LEXIS 9506 … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Leatherman tool on belt could be considered weapon for frisk

Leftovers

2255 petitioner fails to show grounds for a CoA from his search claims, without telling us the rationale. United States v. Renteria, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30239 (5th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).* Defendant’s stop and frisk was without reasonable suspicion. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk, Strip search | Comments Off on Leftovers

CA11: No prejudice for failing to file motion to suppress drug def was acquitted of

2254 petitioner can’t show prejudice from defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress cocaine when he was acquitted of that charge. Zayas-Acosta v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30236 (11th Cir. Nov. 27, 2024). Challenge … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA11: No prejudice for failing to file motion to suppress drug def was acquitted of

FL6: Def confesses error that his motion to suppress abandoned property shouldn’t have been granted

Defendant moved to suppress something he threw away in flight from the police, and the trial court granted it. On appeal, he confesses error that it was abandoned. Reversed. State v. Howard, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 9246 (Fla. 6th DCA … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL6: Def confesses error that his motion to suppress abandoned property shouldn’t have been granted

WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy?

WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy? by Tatum Hunter (“Clear saves you time at the airport. Just make sure to read the fine print.” “Airport security is, by nature, at odds with individual privacy. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Airport searches, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy?

Debra Cassens Weiss, Are police responsible for damaging home to oust suspect? Sotomayor and Gorsuch see important issue

Debra Cassens Weiss, Are police responsible for damaging home to oust suspect? Sotomayor and Gorsuch see important issue (ABAJ Nov. 26, 2024) (“The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to decide whether police must compensate a Texas homeowner for damages … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Debra Cassens Weiss, Are police responsible for damaging home to oust suspect? Sotomayor and Gorsuch see important issue