Daily Archives: October 30, 2021

TX1: Commercial truck driver had standing to challenge seizure of cell phone from truck after his arrest

Defendant retained a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell phone that was left in the semi he was driving for a commercial carrier when he was arrested. The owner of the truck retrieved the phone and sent it to … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Standing, Strip search | Comments Off on TX1: Commercial truck driver had standing to challenge seizure of cell phone from truck after his arrest

N.D.Ohio: Where there was no nexus and whether GFE should apply was a really close question, govt essentially gets the benefit of the doubt

“For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Defendant Eben Anderson’s motion to suppress. With respect to Defendant Anthony Anderson, the affidavit supporting the warrant lacks probable cause justifying the search because there is no nexus between the phones and … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Where there was no nexus and whether GFE should apply was a really close question, govt essentially gets the benefit of the doubt

E.D.N.Y.: Handing over DL on request for police look wasn’t a seizure

Defendant was asked by the police for his ID. He gave it over and they noted it and gave it back. This was not a seizure. United States v. Stephenson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206467 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2021).* Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Handing over DL on request for police look wasn’t a seizure

W.D.N.C.: Using a key to open a lockbox named in a SW rather than breaking it open is hardly unreasonable

Using defendant’s key to unlock a lockbox within the terms of the search warrant was not unreasonable. United States v. Frady, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205784 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2021).* [Does he really expect that breaking into it is the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Voluntariness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Using a key to open a lockbox named in a SW rather than breaking it open is hardly unreasonable

N.D.Ill.: No REP in automatic license plate reader records in state database

The FBI querying the state automatic license plate reader database to connect a car to two bank robberies was not an unreasonable search. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the information. United States v. Brown, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: No REP in automatic license plate reader records in state database

CA10: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

“Plaintiffs maintain that, because Salt Lake City Police violated the Fourth Amendment by unconstitutionally searching and seizing Jerrail Taylor and Adam Thayne, their statements should be excluded in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. They advance this argument despite the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA10: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

CA9: Heck claims should be dismissed without prejudice

Heck claims should be dismissed without prejudice in case the plaintiff can invalidate the conviction. Lund v. California, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 32096 (9th Cir. Oct. 26, 2021). The case has a helpful explanation of Heck:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA9: Heck claims should be dismissed without prejudice

ID: Officer taking DL and handing it to another officer to check was a seizure requiring RS; anonymous CI was not corroborated

Reasonable suspicion was required when the officer retained defendant’s driver’s license by taking it, leaving her presence, and giving it to another officer to run a license check. Defendant was thus detained because a reasonable person in her position would … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Inevitable discovery, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: Officer taking DL and handing it to another officer to check was a seizure requiring RS; anonymous CI was not corroborated