Monthly Archives: April 2021

M.D.Pa.: Calling for backup before asking motorist for consent was the “Rodriguez moment” but it was with RS

“‘[T]he proper inquiry is not whether a traffic violation actually occurred, but rather whether there are facts presented that would lead a reasonable officer to believe that a violation may have occurred.’ … ‘This standard is not particularly rigorous, as … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Calling for backup before asking motorist for consent was the “Rodriguez moment” but it was with RS

OH4: Criminal investigation’s SW production was admissible in child dependency proceeding

A search warrant produced drug evidence admissible in a dependency and neglect proceeding, and that supported the finding. In re J.M., 2021-Ohio-1415, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 1376 (4th Dist. Apr. 19, 2021). Defendant’s son “posted a video on the internet” … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on OH4: Criminal investigation’s SW production was admissible in child dependency proceeding

D.N.J.: Protective sweep of hotel room of armored car robbery suspect was reasonable

“Here, the uncontested facts justify a protective sweep of the hotel room. Detective Holmes testified that at the time of Defendant’s arrest, there was still a suspect in the armored truck robbery at-large whose whereabouts were unknown. … As such, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Protective sweep of hotel room of armored car robbery suspect was reasonable

CA11: Assuming geo-location info for def’s cell phone was illegally obtained, it was harmless BRD

“We assume without deciding that the district court erred in allowing the admission of the Google geo-location data during trial because it amounted to fruit of the poisonous tree, and no exception applied. Nevertheless, Pendergrass is not entitled to a … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: Assuming geo-location info for def’s cell phone was illegally obtained, it was harmless BRD

CA6: Affiant’s not checking the accuracy of information in a computer system before relying on it was not a Franks violation

The affiant’s not checking the accuracy of information in a computer system before relying on it was not a Franks violation. United States v. Thomas, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 11884 (6th Cir. Apr. 20, 2021):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Affiant’s not checking the accuracy of information in a computer system before relying on it was not a Franks violation

D.Neb.: CI report led to controlled buy and that was PC

A CI with a reliable track record reported defendant was selling ecstacy. That alone was likely at least reasonable suspicion, but then police used him to make a controlled buy, and that was probable cause for the stop. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: CI report led to controlled buy and that was PC

S.D.W.Va.: Uncorroborated CI, criminal history, and inconclusive trash pull didn’t support SW for house; no GFE

“Pending before the court is Defendant’s motion to suppress 48 pounds of methamphetamine, $41,000 in cash, and all other evidence seized during a search of his residence by the Metropolitan Drug Enforcement Network Team (‘MDENT’). I find that neither the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Uncorroborated CI, criminal history, and inconclusive trash pull didn’t support SW for house; no GFE

EFF: Your Service Provider’s Terms of Service Shouldn’t Overrule Your 4A Rights

EFF: Your Service Provider’s Terms of Service Shouldn’t Overrule Your Fourth Amendment Rights by Jennifer Lynch:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: Your Service Provider’s Terms of Service Shouldn’t Overrule Your 4A Rights

E.D.Mo.: Constitutionality of window tint statute doesn’t have anything to do with PC for a stop for overtinting

Even if Missouri’s window tint statute was unconstitutional, something in doubt, it wouldn’t have any affect on the reasonableness of defendant’s stop for violating it, and the exclusionary rule would not apply. Factually, the officer said he couldn’t see into … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Constitutionality of window tint statute doesn’t have anything to do with PC for a stop for overtinting

W.D.Ky.: Out past curfew during BLM protests was PC for stop

Officers seeing defendant driving during a BLM protest curfew in June 2020 in Louisville had probable cause for the stop. United States v. Shrivers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77047 (W.D. Ky. Apr. 21, 2021).* A CI with a reliable track … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Out past curfew during BLM protests was PC for stop

D.Idaho: Def’s available suppression remedy supplants Rule 41(g) motion seeking to quash SW

Defendant filed a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property that also sought to quash a search warrant. He has the remedy in his criminal case. Purbeck v. Wilkinson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76412 (D. Idaho Apr. 21, 2021). The … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Motion to suppress, Particularity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Def’s available suppression remedy supplants Rule 41(g) motion seeking to quash SW

IL: For “immediately apparent” in plain view, only “practical, nontechnical” probability that incriminating evidence is involved is required

On the incriminating nature of an object in plain view being “immediately apparent,” “[a]ll that is required is a ‘“practical, nontechnical”’ probability that incriminating evidence is involved.” People v. Molnar, 2021 IL App (2d) 190289, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 192 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: For “immediately apparent” in plain view, only “practical, nontechnical” probability that incriminating evidence is involved is required

W.D.Mich.: 1983 suit over state detention without bond barred by Younger abstention

Plaintiff detainee’s 1983 case he was being held without bond in a state prosecution is barred by Younger absention. Snowden v. Schipper, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76275 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 20, 2021). “Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: 1983 suit over state detention without bond barred by Younger abstention

N.D.Cal.: Exigency for entry fails; officers knew victim was not there

The emergency aid justification for a warrantless entry into defendant’s house in a domestic dispute wasn’t applicable because there no longer was an emergency. The victim was safe elsewhere and nobody was home. Also, the good faith exception wasn’t proved … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Exigency for entry fails; officers knew victim was not there

C.D.Cal.: Delayed first appearance 4A claim should be brought by habeas not § 1983

Plaintiff’s claim he did not receive his first appearance within 48 hours should have been brought by habeas under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 not a § 1983 action. Young v. Levert, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76021 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Delayed first appearance 4A claim should be brought by habeas not § 1983

N.D.Ga.: Cell tower dumps to attempt to solve 12 robberies did not require SW

There were 12 robberies and officers got cell tower dumps to attempt to figure out the phone involved. Cell tower dumps did not require a search warrant. United States v. Rhodes, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75184 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 20, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Hot pursuit, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Cell tower dumps to attempt to solve 12 robberies did not require SW

NC: Officer waving down a motorist at 3 am was a seizure

“The issue in this case is whether a driver is “seized” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when he is tailed by a marked police cruiser down empty streets at 3 a.m., followed into an empty parking lot, and … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Seizure | Comments Off on NC: Officer waving down a motorist at 3 am was a seizure

WI: Officer inquiring of pill bottle in plain view during traffic stop did not unreasonably extend stop

Officer in a traffic stop inquiring of a pill bottle in plain view wasn’t unreasonable under Rodriguez. State v. Crone, 2021 Wisc. App. LEXIS 192 (Apr. 20, 2021). The officer’s sticking his head inside defendant’s car and smelling marijuana was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Officer inquiring of pill bottle in plain view during traffic stop did not unreasonably extend stop

Reason: Lawmakers Look To Stop the Feds From Secretly Buying Your Private Data

Reason: Lawmakers Look To Stop the Feds From Secretly Buying Your Private Data by Scott Shackford (“A 2018 Supreme Court decision was supposed to protect your location data from federal snooping. That’s not what happened.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Reason: Lawmakers Look To Stop the Feds From Secretly Buying Your Private Data

CA9: Saying you just found the backpack you’re carrying in a dumpster shows no REP

“First, the court did not clearly err in finding that Gage had abandoned any reasonable expectation of privacy in the backpack by telling Officer Robinson that the group had just retrieved the backpack from a garbage dump and that he … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA9: Saying you just found the backpack you’re carrying in a dumpster shows no REP