Daily Archives: April 23, 2021

D.Idaho: Def’s available suppression remedy supplants Rule 41(g) motion seeking to quash SW

Defendant filed a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property that also sought to quash a search warrant. He has the remedy in his criminal case. Purbeck v. Wilkinson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76412 (D. Idaho Apr. 21, 2021). The … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Motion to suppress, Particularity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Def’s available suppression remedy supplants Rule 41(g) motion seeking to quash SW

IL: For “immediately apparent” in plain view, only “practical, nontechnical” probability that incriminating evidence is involved is required

On the incriminating nature of an object in plain view being “immediately apparent,” “[a]ll that is required is a ‘“practical, nontechnical”’ probability that incriminating evidence is involved.” People v. Molnar, 2021 IL App (2d) 190289, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 192 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: For “immediately apparent” in plain view, only “practical, nontechnical” probability that incriminating evidence is involved is required

W.D.Mich.: 1983 suit over state detention without bond barred by Younger abstention

Plaintiff detainee’s 1983 case he was being held without bond in a state prosecution is barred by Younger absention. Snowden v. Schipper, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76275 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 20, 2021). “Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: 1983 suit over state detention without bond barred by Younger abstention

N.D.Cal.: Exigency for entry fails; officers knew victim was not there

The emergency aid justification for a warrantless entry into defendant’s house in a domestic dispute wasn’t applicable because there no longer was an emergency. The victim was safe elsewhere and nobody was home. Also, the good faith exception wasn’t proved … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Exigency for entry fails; officers knew victim was not there

C.D.Cal.: Delayed first appearance 4A claim should be brought by habeas not § 1983

Plaintiff’s claim he did not receive his first appearance within 48 hours should have been brought by habeas under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 not a § 1983 action. Young v. Levert, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76021 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Delayed first appearance 4A claim should be brought by habeas not § 1983