Monthly Archives: March 2021

CA6: SW was particular because particular affidavit was incorporated

The search warrant here was particular because it incorporated the affidavit by reference, and they were attached. United States v. Evans Landscaping Inc., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 8152 (6th Cir. Mar. 18, 2021). Defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Particularity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: SW was particular because particular affidavit was incorporated

D.V.I.: CI’s information of def was commonly known and in paper; yet, GFE applies

The search warrant here was based on the CI’s relating largely publicly-known information, some of which was in the newspaper online. It wasn’t predictive, but all historical of criminal record, the kind of car, etc. This is close but no … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on D.V.I.: CI’s information of def was commonly known and in paper; yet, GFE applies

D.S.D.: Def’s past history with drugs didn’t support RS for continuing this stop

Knowledge of defendant’s past history with drugs and trafficking collectively didn’t provide reasonable suspicion that he was involved in the day in question. United States v. Johnson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52210 (D.S.D. Mar. 16, 2021):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Def’s past history with drugs didn’t support RS for continuing this stop

D.S.D.: Suppression or dismissal aren’t remedies for violation of Right to Financial Privacy Act

Grand jury subpoenas are a proper method of obtaining bank records under the Right to Financial Privacy Act enacted after Miller. Also, suppression and dismissal aren’t remedies under the Act. United States v. Lundahl, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52211 (D.S.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Inventory | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Suppression or dismissal aren’t remedies for violation of Right to Financial Privacy Act

D.Utah: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in false arrest civil cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in false arrest civil cases. Linin v. Neff, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51836 (D. Utah. Mar. 18, 2021). [In fact, it may be the crux of the case.] Probable cause was shown for a search … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Utah: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in false arrest civil cases

NY4: Did def’s PC argument suggest a lack of standing?

Defendant’s framing of his probable cause issue here would seem to lead to his lack of standing. Here, his claim was the lack of probable cause for the search of the phone because it wasn’t his. But, isn’t that a … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on NY4: Did def’s PC argument suggest a lack of standing?

UT: No IAC for not objecting to recording of jail phone calls for spousal privilege

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising spousal privilege to recorded jail telephone calls since there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the calls where spousal privilege in this context hadn’t been raised before in the state. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Privileges | Comments Off on UT: No IAC for not objecting to recording of jail phone calls for spousal privilege

E.D.Wis.: Video of aftermath of execution of SW more prejudicial than relevant under Rule 403

In a civil case over a shooting of dogs during execution of a search warrant, the court rejects that the warrant was unreasonable but finds the bodycam of shooting the dogs and the aftermath irrelevant and inflammatory under Rule 403. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Video of aftermath of execution of SW more prejudicial than relevant under Rule 403

LA1: Evading a traffic stop justifies a patdown

Defendant’s stop was justified by a traffic offense. His evading justified a patdown. State v. Young, 2021 La. App. LEXIS 377 (La. App. 1 Cir. Mar. 18, 2021). “In this case, the Court need not determine whether the search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA1: Evading a traffic stop justifies a patdown

W.D.N.C.: Gant bars search of car trunk

A search of a car trunk incident to arrest is barred by Gant. United States v. Abusnena, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51605 (W.D. N.C. Mar. 18, 2021). Then there is this observation:

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Gant bars search of car trunk

MI: City’s use of drone photos in zoning dispute violated homeowner’s REP

The township’s use of a drone to fly over defendant’s property to take pictures for a zoning dispute violated their reasonable expectation of privacy. The state legislature said that they have one from drone usage. Long Lake Twp. v. Maxon, … Continue reading

Posted in Drones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on MI: City’s use of drone photos in zoning dispute violated homeowner’s REP

MI: Inventory policy doesn’t have to be written if it’s standardized

A written search inventory policy isn’t constitutionally required. “We hold that, in order to establish that an inventory search is reasonable, the prosecution must establish that an inventory-search policy existed, all police officers were required to follow the policy, the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Issue preclusion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Waiver | Comments Off on MI: Inventory policy doesn’t have to be written if it’s standardized

WA: Crime victim stated claim for conversion against state for return of property

A crime victim has a right to return of property pending an investigation if the state doesn’t need it for court. “Our ruling today does not undermine the City’s interest in protecting sensitive records regarding ongoing criminal investigations. Ms. Burton … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on WA: Crime victim stated claim for conversion against state for return of property

D.Minn.: Information from named security guard passing on detailed hearsay from unidentified source in 911 call was reliable

The 911 caller here was an identified security guard who passed on detailed information he’d received from a source. The detail made it reliable enough for reasonable suspicion. United States v. Valenzuela, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50262 (D. Minn. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Information from named security guard passing on detailed hearsay from unidentified source in 911 call was reliable

CA3: No REP in non-legal jail email

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in inmate non-legal jail email. Robinson v. Pennsylvania Dep’t of Corr., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7900 (3d Cir. Mar. 18, 2021). Defendant consented to come in to talk about the investigation and to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, E-mail, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA3: No REP in non-legal jail email

DC: Tacit approval for private search made it state action

Defendant was arrested in a rental car, and he claimed ownership of the bags in the trunk. The police gave tacit approval to the towing company employee’s search of the bags, thus making him an agent for the search. Fogg … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Private search | Comments Off on DC: Tacit approval for private search made it state action

D.Minn.: Pleading warrant process “irregularities” without showing anything prejudicial insufficient

Defendant’s perceived “irregularities” with the warrants raising “troubling and unanswered questions concerning the integrity of the warrant process” essentially invites the court to speculate where he doesn’t. The court won’t do that. United States v. Jones, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Pleading warrant process “irregularities” without showing anything prejudicial insufficient

IL: Def’s failure to answer request for consent is not implied consent

When asked for consent, defendant didn’t answer. The officer’s testimony that “he not tell me no” was not consent, which had to proved by the state. People v. Banta, 2021 IL App (4th) 180761, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 112 (Mar. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Hot pursuit, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IL: Def’s failure to answer request for consent is not implied consent

CA3: Nexus shown to def’s home for SW for clothing worn in robbery

When the object of a search is clothing worn during a robbery, there is nexus to defendant’s home. United States v. Ross, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7701 (3d Cir. Mar. 17, 2021). Defendant answered the officer’s knock on the door … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Nexus | Comments Off on CA3: Nexus shown to def’s home for SW for clothing worn in robbery

W.D.Mo.: Affiant in fraud case wasn’t required to cite CFRs on background for the defense

Defendant in a fraud offense pled that federal regulators should have been cited in the affidavit for search warrant so the issuing magistrate will appreciate that this might not be a fraud. That’s not the point of a search warrant. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Affiant in fraud case wasn’t required to cite CFRs on background for the defense